Factors Influencing Tenderness In A Commercial Line Of Pigs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Factors Influencing Tenderness In A Commercial Line Of Pigs

Description:

Factors Influencing Tenderness In A Commercial Line Of Pigs. Phillip J. Rincker ... Historical research has focused on purebred pigs or crosses. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:59
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: phillip86
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Factors Influencing Tenderness In A Commercial Line Of Pigs


1
Factors Influencing Tenderness In A Commercial
Line Of Pigs
  • Phillip J. Rincker
  • University of Illinois
  • at Urbana-Champaign

2
Why is it Important
  • Currently there is a great deal of interest in
    identifying high quality products for branded,
    foodservice, or other specific markets.
  • Some of the most common techniques involve
    marbling, pH, and color.

3
  • Historical research has focused on purebred pigs
    or crosses.
  • It would be beneficial to understand how well
    typical meat quality traits predict sensory
    properties and shear force in a commercial line
    of mixed breed pigs.

4
Study Design
  • Use a population with known differences in
    tenderness.
  • Control as many factors as possible
  • Genetics (White line sows x Duroc sire).
  • Management / Production Facility.
  • Slaughter facility / date .
  • Determine what contributes to the variation in
    tenderness values.

5
Initial Data Collection
  • pH measurements
  • 45 minutes
  • 3 hours
  • 6 hours
  • 48 hours

6
pH Decline Data
7
Typical Effects of pH Decline
8
More Data Collection
  • Typical quality measurements.
  • Samples for PA and Histology.
  • Age chops for either 2, 7, 14, or 21 days for
    shear force determination.
  • Effect of pH?
  • Effect of marbling?

9
(No Transcript)
10
pH Decline and Quality
1Bold and italic items significant at P 11
Shear Force and pH
R20.05
12
Shear Force and Lipid
R20.07
13
Methods Part II
  • Isolate loins with known differences in rate and
    extent of post mortem tenderization.
  • Determine what contributes to the variation in
    tenderness.

14
Average Aging Curves
15
What Might Contribute?
  • Few Quality Differences
  • Collagen Content
  • Sarcomere Length
  • Protein Degradation

16
Results
17
Summary
  • Measures of pork quality were quite variable.
  • Single genotype, slaughter day/facility.
  • Marbling
  • Ultimate pH
  • Color, WHC
  • Sensory properties, shear force
  • 50 did not tenderize post mortem
  • Not explained by desmin degradation.

18
Implications
  • Typical measures of pork quality did not explain
    much variation.
  • Unexpected differences in aging not explained by
    collagen or sarcomeres.
  • Post mortem proteolysis of desmin does not ensure
    tenderization.

19
Thank You
  • Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com