Title: Stress and Strain in Subduction Earthquake Cycles
1Stress and Strain inSubduction Earthquake
Cycles
- Kelin Wang
- Pacific Geoscience Centre, Geological Survey of
Canada - School of EarthOcean Sciences, University of
Victoria - Acknowledgements
- Dragert, He, Hyndman, James, Konomi, Melosh,
Mulder, Rogers, Sagiya, Suyehiro, Wells, Zhao,
etc.
2Stress and Strain inSubduction Earthquake
Cycles
- Weakness of subduction faults
- Stress and stress change
- Interseismic deformation
3Summary of Stresses
- focal mechanisms, in situ measurements, and most
geological evidence show consistent stress pattern
- maximum compression is margin-parallel
- margin-normal stress is similar to vertical
stress ( lithostatic)
4Summary of Stresses
5(No Transcript)
6Nankai Forearc Stresses and geodetic strain
rates are similar to Cascadia
7- Why is margin-parallel compression large?
- Why is margin-normal stress small?
- Why is geodetic contraction margin-normal?
- Local tectonic environment
- Fundamental process
- Interseismic deformation
8Why margin-parallel compression?
PA-NA plate motion B R spreading Oblique
subduction Northward forearc motion Canadian
buttress
9(No Transcript)
10Why is margin-normal stress small?
- Margin-normal stress controlled by two competing
factors - Gravity induces horizontal tension in forearc
- Plate coupling causes compression
11(No Transcript)
12(No Transcript)
13(No Transcript)
14(No Transcript)
15(No Transcript)
16(No Transcript)
17Why is geodetic contraction margin-normal?
Geodetic measurements do not detect absolute
elastic stress. They detect changes in elastic
stress.
GREAT earthquake cycles cause small
perturbations to forearc stress.
18A Stretched Elastic Band
Time 1 Tension
Time 2 Less tension
Contraction
19(No Transcript)
20Margin-normal stress perturbation
Margin-parallel compression
21Margin-normal stress perturbation
Margin-parallel compression
22Viscoelastic 2-D finite element
23(No Transcript)
24(No Transcript)
25Rupture
After-slip
Stress relaxation
Silent slip
Stress relaxation
26Viscoelastic deformation model for Cascadia (3-D
spherical finite element)
Model by J. He
27(No Transcript)
28(No Transcript)
29(No Transcript)
30Cascadia
Nankai
Interseismic strain rates are much larger at
Nankai
31GPS data by GFZ, Potsdam, Germany Model by Yan Hu
32Effective transition zone (Wang et al., JGR,
2003)
33(No Transcript)
34(No Transcript)
35(No Transcript)
36(Courtesy of Dragert and Rogers, PGC) See SSA
abstract by Dragert and Rogers, IUGG abstract by
Dragert, Rogers, and Wang.
37Summary
- Subduction faults are weak (m lt 0.1)
- Small margin-normal stress
- Low frictional heating
- Great earthquakes cause small stress perturbation
- Interseismic margin-normal contraction
- May modulate forearc seismicity
- Interseismic deformation is time dependent
- Strain rates decrease with time
- Mantle rheology (viscoelastic) vs. fault
behavior
38(No Transcript)
39(No Transcript)
40Aug. 1999 Transient Displacements vs Long-term
Deformation Motions (both wrt DRAO)