Implementation of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Implementation of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934

Description:

Insul had loans from every major bank in Illinois. ... National City Bank: the second largest commercial bank in the country. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:131
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: juliann6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Implementation of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934


1
Implementation of the Securities Act of 1933 and
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934
2
Brief Overview
  • 1929 Stock Market Crashes
  • 1932-1933 Senate Banking Committee investigates
    reasons for the market crash
  • 1933 Securities Act of 1933 is passed
  • 1934 Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 is
    passed
  • 1934 Securities and Exchange Commission is
    formed

3
The Crash of 1929
  • Black Thursday October 24, 1929
  • House of Morgan invests money in attempts to
    raise the prices of stocks
  • Black Tuesday October 29, 1929
  • This is the first time in the history of the New
    York Stock Exchange that private investors and
    corporations cannot fix the problems in the
    market

4
Senate Banking Committee Investigation
  • Members want to know why the stock market crashed
    and punish anyone who acted illegally.
  • Some of their theories
  • Short selling stocks
  • Selling worthless foreign bonds
  • Earnings reported on annual reports and earnings
    reported to the IRS vary significantly
  • Stocks being sold at different prices to
    different people
  • Supply exceeding demand

5
Initiating the Investigation
  • President Hoover avoided initiating the
    investigation as long as he could.
  • In February, hearings began due to rumors of a
    plan to short sell stocks
  • The Senate Banking Committee and Hoover both made
    it clear that no federal legislation was intended
    to be implemented

6
The Senate Banking Committees First Attempt
  • Peter Norbeck, Chairman of the Senate Banking
    Committee, appoints Claude Branche as lead
    counsel
  • Branche is timid and unprepared
  • His first witness, Richard Whitney, President of
    the New York Stock Exchange, is his exact
    opposite
  • Not really moving any farther than Whitney, the
    investigation ceased, and the Senate Considered
    discontinuing funding the investigation

7
The Pecora Hearings
  • Roosevelt was anxious to have the hearings
    reconvene
  • At the same time, Roosevelt was anxious to impose
    federal legislation in regards to the trading of
    securities
  • Ferdinand Pecora was appointed lead counsel nine
    days after President Roosevelt took office.

8
Pecoras First Victim
  • Insul a group of public utility companies that
    collapsed in 1931 after previously providing 10
    of the countrys electricity and many other
    services
  • Pecoras findings
  • All five major holding companies had minority
    control by a member of the Insul family
  • Shares were sold to himself and his family at
    half price
  • Shareholders were informed of a 10.3 million
    profit in 1930. The IRS was informed of a 6.5
    loss.
  • Insul had loans from every major bank in
    Illinois. Many were cash advances that exceeded
    the state mandated limits

9
Pecoras Next Victim
  • National City Bank the second largest
    commercial bank in the country. They gave
    excessive cash advances to Insul
  • Pecoras findings
  • The company had violated laws that prevented
    commercial banks from participating in
    nonbanking activities
  • The company hired unqualified people at high
    commission rates to sell foreign bonds
  • Shares were sold to president Charles E
    Mitchells wife to create a tax loss. This was a
    clear violation of tax laws.

10
Pecoras Final Victim
  • House of Morgan a huge investment banking firm,
    which was broken up, but is still successful
    today
  • This investigation was highly publicized.
  • Pecoras findings
  • He discovered that the House of Morgan hadnt
    paid taxes on tax years 1929-1932. The House of
    Morgan had legitimate reasons.
  • House of Morgan stock was sold at a decreased
    price to prominent political figures, such as
    William McAdoo, a member of the Senate Banking
    Committee.

11
Conclusion to the Pecora Hearings
  • The Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities and
    Exchange Act of 1934 were the direct responses to
    the Pecora Hearings of 1933
  • When the Acts are examined, there is a response
    to each of the findings in the Pecora Hearings
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com