Working Group indicators and data Work progress - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Working Group indicators and data Work progress

Description:

ETC-TE/WG-ID. WG-ID work progress on information and data(1) - 2002: The ICZM Recommendation ... quality as it shows a real interest in the construction of ICZM. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:47
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: alejandro84
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Working Group indicators and data Work progress


1
Working Group indicators and dataWork progress
  • Françoise Breton Clive Gilbert
  • ETC-TE/WG-ID

2
WG-ID work progress on information and data(1)
  • - 2002 The ICZM Recommendation
  • - 2002 First ICZM Expert Group
    meeting?establishment of the WG-ID
  • - 2003-04 WG-ID works on the design of 2 sets of
    indicators
  • One measuring progress in implementing ICZM (ICZM
    Progress indicator)
  • A set of 27 indicators to measure sustainable
    development of the coastal zone (the SD
    indicators)
  • 22 April 2004 The ICZM Expert Group accepted
    both sets of indicators but suggested further
    testing of progress indicator and calculation of
    some SD indicators.

Expert Group Meeting, Brussels, 1st June 2006
3
WG-ID work progress on information and data(2)
ICZM progress indicator
  • 2004 First pilot tests ICZM Progress indicator
    over 100 practitionners in England, Wales,
    Belgium, Holland and France.
  • 2005 Results taken into account to produce a
    Guidance note for completing the Progress
    indicator (Sent to the Expert Group July 2005)
  • Minor corrections of the indicator
  • 2005-2006 National workshops ( regional
    workshops) to implement the progress indicator

Expert Group Meeting, Brussels, 1st June 2006
4
Sinthesis of work done
Designing 2 Indicator sets 2002-2004
  • ICZM Progress
  • First testings? Guidelines
  • Questionnaire done in 8 countries
  • SD indicadors
  • Data availability, draft fact sheets
  • DEDUCE work

Methodology 2004-2005 Implementation 2005-2006
Full implementation for selected countries
2006-2007
Populating indicator factsheets
5
ICZM progress indicator
  • 8 participants filling questionnaire
  • National workshop Belgium, France, South UK,
    Poland, Spain, Malta
  • Bi-lateral contacts with colleagues from diff.
    Competent authorities Greece
  • Regional workshop Adriatic Forum (Marche,
    Abruzzo, Italy)

Expert Group Meeting, Brussels, 1st June 2006
6
ICZM progress indicator 2005-06 Workshops
7
ICZM progress indicator 2005-06 Workshops (2)
  • COREPOINT project workshops (collabor. From A.
    Pickaver)
  • North East England
  • Belgium
  • Wales
  • Ireland (TBD)
  • France (TBD)
  • HELCOM 2005 in Germany, Lithuania
  • and Poland (Using the indicator set for formal
    reporting )
  • WG-ID workshops pending in 2006
  • North UK
  • Scotland

8
ICZM Progress main trends (1) 2000-05
Expert Group Meeting, Brussels, 1st June 2006
9
ICZM Progress main trends (2)2000-05
Expert Group Meeting, Brussels, 1st June 2006
10
2005 Four countries, all levels
Expert Group Meeting, Brussels, 1st June 2006
11
2005 England national, regional, local
Expert Group Meeting, Brussels, 1st June 2006
12
2005. England all levels, phases 1 to 4
Expert Group Meeting, Brussels, 1st June 2006
13
ICZM Progress main results (1)
  • First results confirm that questionaire is a
    legitimised exercise
  • Conducted workshop used as a mechanism to
    transfer knowledge on ICZM? highly recommended.
    Linking ICZM with national planning system
  • Use of Dont know really useful
  • Most participants feel that 3 levels (Yes, No,
    Dont Know) not enough?They recommend to
    introduce a scale of 4 levels (started, advanced,
    completed and DK)
  • Useful for National reports building a baseline
    in 2005

Expert Group Meeting, Brussels, 1st June 2006
14
ICZM Progress main results (2)
  • General trend of progress in all countries
  • Results are linked with territorial organization
    of countries (more centralised, more federative)
    each country prioritize a number of actions
  • More ICZM actions done at national, regional or
    local level depending on authority distribution.
  • Some actions are unclear, difficult to
    understand? alternative writing to be done in
    2007

Expert Group Meeting, Brussels, 1st June 2006
15
ICZM Progress main results (2)
  • Many comments ask review of Phase 4 which should
    be organized around 5 main actions
  • Integration of the administration body and clear
    ICZM procedure in place
  • Integration of information, GIS and indicators
  • Good system of participation and governance (what
    is it?)
  • Stable system of ICZM financing
  • Follow up system in place TO MEASURE the
    sustainability of the coast (SD) ? bridging both
    sets
  • (2007)

Expert Group Meeting, Brussels, 1st June 2006
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com