Biologicallymotivated approaches to extrapolation from high to low doses and the advent of systems b - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 44
About This Presentation
Title:

Biologicallymotivated approaches to extrapolation from high to low doses and the advent of systems b

Description:

Iterate with data collection. 21. Data. 22 'Omics' Genomics. Proteomics. Metabonomics ' ... MAPK, IL-1a, and NF-kB computational 'modules' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:55
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: epa99
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Biologicallymotivated approaches to extrapolation from high to low doses and the advent of systems b


1
Biologically-motivated approaches to
extrapolation from high to low doses and the
advent of systems biology The road to
toxicological safety assessment
  • Rory B. Conolly, Sc.D.
  • Center for Computational Systems Biology
  • Human Health Assessment
  • CIIT Centers for Health Research
  • rconolly_at_ciit.org
  • U.S. EPA Board of Scientific Counselors Risk
    Assessment Workshop, National Academy of Sciences
    Auditorium, Washington, DC, February 2-3, 2005.

2
Outline
  • Toxicity and dose-response
  • Priorities Toxicity or safety?
  • Toxicological safety assessment
  • Summary and conclusions

3
Typical high dose rodent data what do they tell
us?
Response
4
Not much!
Response
?
5
Possibilities
Response
6
Possibilities
Response
7
Possibilities
Response
8
Possibilities
Response
9
Historical perspective
  • In the distant past
  • (1970s and earlier)
  • A level of comfort with the use of high dose data
    to imply human health risk
  • Expedient
  • Limited knowledge of mechanisms

10
Historical perspective (II)
  • Then,
  • 1970s, Gehring et al.,
  • vinyl chloride
  • 1980s, Andersen et al.,
  • PBPK modeling, styrene, methylene chloride
  • U.S. EPA cancer guidelines
  • Etc., etc.

11
Today
  • Widespread recognition that chemical-specific
    high-to-low dose extrapolation may differ from
    default approaches.
  • Concern that some high dose mechanisms may not be
    relevant.
  • Need to protect the public health.
  • Need to avoid unnecessary loss of access to
    useful materials.
  • Need to do good science in support of human
    health risk assessment.

12
What are our priorities?
  • Study of poisons?
  • Effects and mechanisms regardless of dose
  • Evaluation of chemical safety?
  • Dose-response in the region of actual or
    predicted exposure levels.
  • Given limited resources, where do we focus our
    efforts?

13
Partition the problem into manageable parts
14
Is safety assessment a practicable alternative?
  • Three key elements
  • Exposure
  • Need data or predictions
  • Biologically-based dosimetry models
  • PBPK, CFD
  • Systems biology
  • Opportunity to understand, at the molecular
    level, the transition from normal biology to
    frank toxicity

15
Tissue dosimetry is the front end to a
pharmacodynamic model
16
CFD simulation of nasal airflow(Kimbell et. al)
17
Systems biology
18
Levels of biological organization
  • Populations
  • Organisms
  • Tissues
  • Cells
  • Organelles
  • Molecules

Mechanistic
Descriptive
19
Levels of biological organization
  • Populations
  • Organisms
  • Tissues
  • Cells
  • Organelles
  • Molecules

(systems)
20
Approach
  • Initial pathway identification
  • Static map
  • Existing data
  • New data
  • Computational modeling
  • Dynamic behavior
  • Iterate with data collection

21
Data
22
Omics
  • Genomics
  • Proteomics
  • Metabonomics
  • parts list of the biological machine

23
Robots
24
(No Transcript)
25
ATM curated Pathway from Pathway Assist
26
Computational systems biology
  • Organize and integrate data
  • Study dynamic behavior
  • Analysis
  • Are model predictions consistent with existing
    data?
  • Predictions
  • Suggest new experiments
  • Ability to predict data before it is collected is
    a good test of the model

27
Example
  • Skin irritation
  • MAPK, IL-1a, and NF-kB computational modules
  • High throughput overexpression data to
    characterize IL-1a MAPK interaction with
    respect to NF-kB

28
Skin Irritation
Chemical
Dead cells
Epidermis
Tissue damage
(keratinocytes)
Tissue damage
Dermis
Nerve Endings
A cascade of inflammatory responses (cytokines)
(fibroblasts)
Blood vessels
  • Study on the dose response of the skin cells to
    inflammatory cytokines contributes to
    quantitative assessment of skin irritation

29
Modular Composition of IL-1 Signaling
IL-1
Extracellular
IL-1R
Intracellular
IL-1 specific top module
Secondary messenger
MAPK
Others
Constitutive downstream NF-kB module
NF-kB
IL-6, etc.
Transcriptional factors
30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
NF-kB Module Simulation
  • Parameters from existing NF-kB model (Hoffmann et
    al., 2002) and refined to fit experimental data
    in literature

IkB
_

NF-kB
Concentration (mM)
Time (hrs)
Add constant input signal
33
The IBNF-B Signaling Module Temporal Control
and Selective Gene Activation Alexander Hoffmann,
Andre Levchenko, Martin L. Scott, David
Baltimore Science 2981241 1245, 2002
6 hr
34
MAPK intracellular signaling cascades
http//www.weizmann.ac.il/Biology/open_day/book/ro
ny_seger.pdf
35
(No Transcript)
36
MAPK time-course and bifurcation after a short
pulse of PDGF
37
IL-1 MAPK crosstalk and NFkB activation
38
Gain-of-function screen
39
Model prediction
40
Normal variation ? frank toxicity
  • Populations
  • Organisms
  • Tissues
  • Cells
  • Organelles
  • Molecules

Functional changes
Structural changes
Changes in network topology
Stable perturbations
Transient perturbations
41
Paybacks
  • Relevant toxicology
  • Better understanding of what we mean by toxic
  • Perspective on chemical trespass
  • Resources used efficiently
  • Science-based dose-response assessment

42
Summary
  • Toxicity or safety?
  • Toxicological safety assessment
  • Exposure
  • Delivered dose
  • Systems biology
  • Paybacks

43
Acknowledgements
  • CIIT Centers for Health Research
  • Rusty Thomas
  • Maggie Zhao
  • Qiang Zhang
  • Mel Andersen
  • Purdue
  • Yanan Zheng
  • Wright State University
  • Jim McDougal
  • Funding
  • DOE
  • ACC

44
End
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com