General Education: Assessing Our Complex Expectations for Student Learning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

General Education: Assessing Our Complex Expectations for Student Learning

Description:

Deep learning occurs over time transference. Meta-cognitive processes are a significant means of reinforcing learning ... Specific Questions ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:74
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: peg52
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: General Education: Assessing Our Complex Expectations for Student Learning


1
General Education Assessing Our Complex
Expectations for Student Learning
  • Presented at the University of Delaware
  • General Education Institute
  • June 9, 2004
  • Peggy Maki, Ph.D.
  • PeggyMaki_at_aol.com

2
Identify the strategies you use to learn. Recall
something you have recently learned
  • 1.
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.

3
The Complexity of Learning
  • Learning is a complex process of
    interpretation-not a linear process
  • Learners create meaning as opposed to receive
    meaning
  • Knowledge is socially constructed (importance of
    peer-to-peer interaction)
  • Knowing What Students Know, 2001, National
    Academy Press

4
  • People learn differentlyprefer certain ways of
    learning (learning inventories personality,
    instructional preference, social preferences,
    visual, global,
  • verbal, sequential, for example)
  • Deep learning occurs over timetransference
  • Meta-cognitive processes are a significant means
    of reinforcing learning (thinking about ones
    thinking)

Knowing What Students Know, 2001, National
Academy Press
5
  • Learning involves creating relationships between
    short-term and long-term memory
  • Transfer of new knowledge into different contexts
    is important to deepen understanding
  • Practice in various contexts creates expertise

6
Integrated Learning.
7
List Several GE Outcomes You Expect Students to
Demonstrate
  • ___________________________________
  • ___________________________________
  • ___________________________________

8
Assessment Foci
  • Pedagogy
  • Curricular design
  • Instructional design
  • Educational tools

9
Assessment Foci
  • Educational experiences
  • Students learning histories/styles
  • Methods to capture learning--assessment

10
Collaborative Questions of Curiosity that Prompt
Assessment
  • Who Learns
  • What?
  • When?
  • Where?
  • Why?
  • How?

11
Specific Questions
  • What do you expect your students to know and be
    able to do by the end of their education at your
    institution?
  • What do the curricula and other educational
    experiences add up to?
  • What do you do in your classes or in your
    programs to promote the kinds of learning or
    development that the institution seeks?

12
Questions (cond)
  • Which learners benefit from various classroom
    teaching strategies or educational experiences?
  • What educational processes are responsible for
    the intended student outcomes the institution
    seeks?
  • How can you help students make connections
    between classroom learning and experiences
    outside of the classroom?

13
Questions, cond
  • What pedagogies/educational experiences develop
    knowledge, abilities, habits of mind, ways of
    knowing/problem solving?
  • How are curricula and pedagogy designed to
    develop knowledge, abilities, habits of mind,
    ways of knowing?

14
  • How do you intentionally build upon what each of
    you teaches or fosters to achieve programmatic
    and institutional objectivescontexts for
    learning?
  • What methods of assessment capture desired
    student learning--methods that align with
    pedagogy, content, curricular and instructional
    design?

15
Collaboratively Designed Methods to Capture
Learning
  • Every assessment is also based on a set of
    beliefs about the kinds of tasks or situations
    that will prompt students to say, do, or create
    something that demonstrates important knowledge
    and skills. The tasks to which students are asked
    to respond on an assessment are not arbitrary.
  • National Research Council. Knowing what
    students know The science and design of
    educational assessment . Washington, D.C.
    National Academy Press, 2001, p. 47.

16
Collaborative Processes
  • Consensus about shared learning outcomes
  • maps
  • inventories of practice

17
Approaches to Learning
  • Surface Learning
  • Deep Learning

18
When Do You Seek Evidence?
  • Formativealong the way?
  • For example, to ascertain progress
  • or development
  • Summativeat the end?
  • For example, to ascertain mastery level
  • of achievement

19
Collectively.
  • Identify shared expectations for student learning
    (learning outcome statements that describe what
    you expect students to demonstrate or represent
    or produce based on your intentions)
  • Design or select methods to assess those
    expectations that align with learning and
    assessment practices

20
  • Develop criteria and standards of judgment to
    assess student work (scoring rubrics)
  • Analyze and interpret students demonstration or
    representation of learning
  • Modify, change, or design educational practices
    to improve student learning based on analysis and
    interpretations of results.

21
Gather Evidence
Interpret Evidence
Mission/Purposes Learning Outcomes
How well do we achieve our learning outcomes?
Enhance teaching/ learning inform institutional
decision- making, planning, budgeting
22
Collectively Interpret Results
  • Seek patterns
  • Build in institutional level and program level
    discourse (formal and informal times)
  • Tell the story that explains the
    resultstriangulate
  • Determine what you wish to change, revise, or how
    you want to innovate

23
  • Implement changes
  • Assess to determine efficacy of changes
  • Focus on collective effortwhat we do and how we
    do it

24
What and how students learn depends to a major
extent on how they think they will be assessed.
John Biggs, Teaching for Quality Learning at
University What The Student Does. Society for
Research into Higher Education Open University
Press, 1999, p. 141.
25
Works Cited
  • Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for Quality
    Learning at University What The Student Does.
    Great Britain Society for Research into Higher
    Education Open University Press.
  • Maki, P. (June, 2004). Assessing for
    Learning Building a Sustainable Commitment
    Across the Institution. Sterling, VA Stylus
    Publishing, LLC, and AAHE.
  • National Research Council. (2001). Knowing
    What Students Know The Science and Design of
    Educational Assessment. Washington, D.,C.
    National Academy Press.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com