Use of Ensembles to Assess Uncertainties in Consequence Assessment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Use of Ensembles to Assess Uncertainties in Consequence Assessment

Description:

The UK Met Office. uses this information to advise PM Blair. ... UK Met Office Model Run. Decisions? You: are the Prime Minister of the UK ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: AOFr
Learn more at: https://www.ametsoc.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Use of Ensembles to Assess Uncertainties in Consequence Assessment


1
Use of Ensembles to Assess Uncertainties in
Consequence Assessment
  • Robert P. Addis and Robert L. Buckley
  • Atmospheric Technologies Group
  • National Homeland Security Directorate
  • Savannah River National Laboratory
  • March 15, 2006
  • Palmetto Chapter of the American Meteorological
    Society
  • Mini-Technical Meeting, Columbia, South Carolina


2
Plan
  • European ENSEMBLE project brief description
  • US participation in ENSEMBLE
  • Describe the SRNL operational use of RAMS LPDM
  • Atmospheric modeling
  • Why is it so uncertain?
  • Importance of ensembles in atmospheric modeling
  • Understanding model uncertainties for emergency
    response
  • A role for ensembles

3
ENSEMBLE
  • European Union effort to improve modeling
    capabilities in event of hazardous accidental
    releases
  • Follow-up to ATMES (1992), ETEX (1994), and RTMOD
    (1998)
  • Perform ensemble averaging of transport model
    output
  • Numerous countries participating (mostly
    European)
  • SRNL is United States participant
  • Variety of outputs required on pre-selected grid
    (equally spaced latitude/longitude)

4
European ENSEMBLE Project
  • 17 nations (mostly European)
  • 19 institutes
  • using 29 models
  • Currently completed 17 planned exercises and
    several special exercises
  • New ENSEMBLE initiative
  • to expand the domain to anywhere in the world
  • to allow for incident specific grid resolution

5
ENSEMBLE Exercises
  • Ex14-17 Cernavoda, Romania ConvEx-3 May, 2005
  • Ex 13 Malmo, Sweden November, 2004
  • Ex 12 Murmansk, Russia
  • Ex 10 11 London, UK June, 2003
  • Ex 9 Bratislava, Slovak Republic February,
    2003
  • Ex 8 Mochovce, Slovak Republic December, 2002
  • Ex 7 Glasgow, Scotland, UK October, /2002
  • Ex 6 Dublin, Ireland June, 2002
  • Ex 5 Stockholm, Sweden April, 2002
  • Ex 4 Nantes, France February, 2002
  • Ex 3 London, England, UK November, 2001
  • Ex 2 Carcassonne, France October, 2001
  • Ex 1 Lerwick, Scotland, UK April, 2001

6
U.S. Methodology
  • Meteorological (analyzed forecast) fields
  • SRNL uses Regional Atmospheric Modeling System
    (RAMS) to generate meteorological fields
  • Initialize bound with larger scale data (i.e.
    NOAA)
  • Dispersion
  • SRNL uses Lagrangian Particle Dispersion Model
    (LPDM) to perform transport using RAMS winds and
    turbulence
  • Modifications made to accommodate wet/dry
    deposition in LPDM
  • Scripts to automate RAMS portion.
  • Input for LPDM decided the day of the exercise

7
ENSEMBLE and SRNL Modeling Domains
  • Curved nature of the SRNL grid is due to a
    polar-stereographic projection
  • SRNL Large grid
  • covers most of the ENSEMBLE domain
  • Resolution 60 km
  • SRNL Nested grid
  • covers vicinity of the release
  • Resolution 15 km

8
The problem with atmospheric models..
  • Atmosphere is governed by non-linear partial
    differential equations
  • The solutions are not unique
  • In models, uncertainties in initial and boundary
    conditions create uncertainties in the analyzed
    and forecast fields (Chaos Theory)
  • Incomplete knowledge of physical processes, how
    to parameterize them and how to describe scale
    interactions also leads to uncertainties in model
    results.

9
The problem with atmospheric models..
  • Edward Lorenz was running a model of convective
    atmospheric rolls. He wanted to rerun it from the
    middle
  • He jotted down the intermediate parametric value
    to 3 significant figures 0.506, and reran it.
    The solution diverged.
  • The computer stored the intermediate parameter
    on the first run to 6 significant figures
    0.506127

Initial difference 0.000127 or 0.025
10
Importance of initial conditions
Forecast state
Initial state
Initial uncertainty of an atmospheric variable
T, P, u, etc. Described by a probability d
ensity function
Produces an ensemble of predicted states
Reference Roberto Buizza ECMWF
11
The problem with atmospheric models..
  • Atmosphere is governed by non-linear partial
    differential equations
  • The solutions are not unique
  • In models, uncertainties in initial a and
    boundary conditions create uncertainties in the
    analyzed and forecast fields (Chaos Theory)
  • Incomplete knowledge of physical processes, how
    to parameterize them and how to describe scale
    interactions also leads to uncertainties in model
    results.

12
(No Transcript)
13
Ensembles part of the solution
Reference Roberto Buizza ECMWF
Ensembles help us understand uncertainties
14
Ensemble Exercise 10
  • Release from London
  • June 11, 2003 noon
  • Duration 15 minutes
  • Rate 1E13 Bq/hr
  • Cs-137
  • 350 m above ground

15
Decisions?
  • You
  • are the Prime Minister of the UK
  • the Prime Minister of the Netherlands calls you
  • What do you tell him?
  • What did the President of France tell him?
  • What did his own experts tell him?

16
UK Met Office Model Run
The UK Met Office uses this information to advise
PM Blair. Mr. Blair tells PM Balkenende The
plume is well clear of the Netherlands. You have
nothing to worry about.
Amsterdam
17
Decisions?
  • You
  • are the Prime Minister of the UK
  • the Prime Minister of the Netherlands calls you
  • What do you tell him?
  • What did the President of France tell him?
  • What did his own experts tell him?

18
Meteo France Model Run
Meteo France uses this information to advise Pres
ident Chirac. President Chirac tells PM Balkene
nde The plume is definitely inundating the
Netherlands. You must take protective actions.

Amsterdam
19
Decisions?
  • You
  • are the Prime Minister of the UK
  • the Prime Minister of the Netherlands calls you
  • What do you tell him?
  • What did the President of France tell him?
  • What did his own experts tell him?

20
KNMI (Netherlands) Model Run
The Netherlands Met Office (KNMI)
uses this information to advise PM Balkenende.
What does Mr. Balkenende think about the advice
of Mr. Blair or Mr. Chirac?

Amsterdam
21
Three reputable assessments..
  • UK Met Office
  • Meteo France
  • KNMI (Royal Netherlands Met Inst)
  • Three of the most respected national weather
    centers in the world. Their modeling is excellent.

22
(No Transcript)
23
Lets look at another example
  • Discrepancies between models is more the norm,
    than the exception.
  • Consider this example and ask what the Italian
    Prime Minister Berlusconi would do depending on
    which model output he was given.
  • Would he respond differently if his advisers were
    aware of all 4 outputs?

24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
Summary
  • Nonlinear nature of the equations that govern the
    atmosphere,
  • combined with
  • imperfect knowledge of initial boundary
    conditions
  • Results in uncertainties variability in
    numerical atmospheric models
  • Ensembles provide better insight into
  • atmospheric behavior
  • model performance and variability
  • Ensembles provide decision makers with
  • a measure of model uncertainty
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com