Behavioral Health Consequences To An Infectious Disease Outbreak - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 55
About This Presentation
Title:

Behavioral Health Consequences To An Infectious Disease Outbreak

Description:

Accelerate development of promising new antiviral drugs. Disease Mitigation Measures ... In only two of 220 households did adults have to pay for extra child care when ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:116
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 56
Provided by: dhhs65
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Behavioral Health Consequences To An Infectious Disease Outbreak


1
Behavioral Health Consequences To An Infectious
Disease Outbreak
Stephen Formanski, Psy. D. Merritt Chip
Schreiber, Ph. D.
2
Hospitals Full-Up
  • Hospitals Full-Up the 1918 Influenza Pandemic
  • This video shows the implications of Pandemic
    Influenza for Bioterrorism Response.
    www.hopkins-biodefense.org

3
The Public Health Goal A Balanced Approach
  • Inspire Preparedness Without Panic

4
Outline of Presentation
FINISH
Responder Issues
START
Administrative Issues
Medical Clinical Issues
5
Familiar Communicable Diseases are No Less
Threatening
  • Consider these World Health Organization
    statistics
  • One-third of the world's population is infected
    with tuberculosis, and 2 million die from the
    disease each year. As many as 79 of new TB
    infections are "superstrains," resistant to the
    most common therapies.
  • Some 42 million people are HIV positive, and 3.1
    million die from AIDS each year.
  • Between 3 million and 5 million new cases of
    influenza are reported each year, contributing to
    250,000 deaths worldwide.
  • 170 million people are chronically infected with
    the hepatitis C virus, and 3-4 million are newly
    infected each year.

6
Headline Grabbers
  • Human Immunodeficiency Virus Acquired
    Immunodeficiency Disorder (HIV/AIDS)
  • Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)
  • West Nile Virus
  • Avian Flu
  • Virual Hemorrhagic Fevers (VHF)
  • Argentine hemorrhagic fever
  • Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF)
  • Ebola hemorrhagic fever
  • Kyasanur Forest disease
  • Hendra virus disease
  • Bolivian hemorrhagic fever
  • Sabia-associated hemorrhagic fever
  • Venezuelan hemorrhagic fever
  • Lassa fever
  • Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (HPS)
  • Marburg hemorrhagic fever
  • Omsk hemorrhagic fever
  • Nipah virus encephalitis
  • Lymphocytic choriomeningitis (LCM)

7
How Bad Was SARS
  • 2003 SARS outbreak appeared to originate in China
  • Ontario 375 contacted SARS and 44 died
  • Demonstrated that earlier warning signs were
    ignored.
  • Demonstrated that identified faults were not
    corrected.
  • Roughly 30 of quarantined individuals suffered
    sxs of PTSD and depression. Duration of
    quarantine was significantly related to increase
    in PTSD sxs.

8
SARSQuarantine Lessons Learned
  • Civic Duty and not legal consequences was the
    primary motivation for compliance.
  • Public Cooperation depends on public confidence
    that public health decisions are made on an
    independent medical basis
  • Public Cooperation depends upon public
    understanding of what is necessary and the
    authorities are keeping everyone informed of what
    is happening

9
SARS Quarantine Obstacles
  • Fear of loss of income
  • Poor logistical support
  • Psychological Stress
  • Spotty monitoring of compliance
  • Inconsistencies in the application of quarantine
    measures
  • Problems with public communication

10
Recommendation for Quarantine
11
National Pandemic Influenza Planning Landscape
National Strategy and Implementation Plan
Departmental Plans
Component Plans
Synchronization
Federal Region Plans

State, Local, and Urban Area Plans
Private Sector Plans
12
Pandemic Planning Assumptions
  • DHHS and the White House Homeland Security
    Council (HSC) utilizing historical data from this
    centurys pandemics estimated about 20-30 of the
    population would be ill. Worst case scenario
    40.
  • Spread of the Pan flu would be comparable to past
    pandemics and the length of the outbreak would be
    about 6-8 weeks in a given community.
  • Even if 30 of a community gets sick, the illness
    would be spread over an 6-8 week period. The
    average duration of the illness is 10 days.
  • Even in peak times it is likely that no more than
    10 of the community would be ill at any one
    time. (caring for sick family members will raise
    the absentee rate)

13
Planning Assumptions Health Care
  • 50 of ill persons will seek medical care
  • Hospitalization and deaths will depend on the
    virulence of the virus

14
ESF 8 Planning Assumptions at a Glance
  • Planning for a 1918like pandemic
  • Incident of National Significance determined at
    US Stage 2
  • Federal public health and medical assistance
    provided to States, Tribes and Territories will
    be coordinated by HHS/ASPR
  • Public health and medical support to Foreign
    nations and international organizations will be
    coordinated by HHS/ASPR/OGHA and DOS

15
(No Transcript)
16
Influenza Antiviral Drugs and Medical Supplies
  • Strategy
  • Procure 81 million courses of antivirals
  • 6 million courses to be used to contain an
    initial U.S. outbreak
  • 75 million courses to treat 25 percent of U.S.
    population
  • Accelerate development of promising new antiviral
    drugs

17
Disease Mitigation Measures
  • Hand washing and respiratory etiquette
  • Social distancing including the prohibition of
    social gatherings
  • Travel restrictions
  • Use of masks
  • Use of antiviral medications
  • Use of Isolation (confinement of symptomatic
    patients so they wont infect others)
  • Use of voluntary or involuntary quarantine (the
    separation of asymptomic people who may have been
    exposed to infection and may or may not become
    ill)
  • School closures

18
Disease Mitigation Measures Feasibility
  • Hand washing and respiratory etiquette
  • The influenza virus survives on your hand for 5
    minutes or less. This mitigating measure is
    advisable.
  • Social Distancing
  • The recommendation is a distance of 3 feet or
    more. Efficacy of this
  • course is unknown and in many situations not
    likely (bus, rail, air travel,
  • grocery shopping) NYC subway averages 4.7
    million riders each day.
  • Los Angeles Metro area averages 1.3 million
    riders per day.
  • Travel Restrictions
  • The World Health Organization Writing Group
    stated
  • screening and quarantining entering travelers
    at
  • international borders did not substantially
    delay virus
  • introduction in past pandemics. . . and will
    likely be even
  • less effective in the modern era.
  • WHO group on SARS concluded that entry
    screening of travelers through health
    declarations or thermal scanning at
    international borders had little documented
    effect of detecting SARS cases.

19
Disease Mitigation Measures Feasibility
  • Use of masks
  • PPE is essential to curtail the transmission of
    influenza in hospitals.
  • Patients would be advised to wear surgical masks
    to decrease respiratory particles being sent into
    the air.
  • In Asia during the SARS epidemic many people wore
    surgical masks in public. Studies have shown the
    ordinary surgical masks do little to prevent
    inhaling small droplets which may contain
    influenza. The masks can only be worn for a
    short time before the pores of the mask clog with
    moisture from breathing and the airflow goes
    around the mask.

20
Disease Mitigation Measures Feasibility
  • Use of Antiviral Medications
  • The effectiveness and optimal use of antivirals
    is uncertain due to several factors
  • Virus mutation, thus increasing the possibility
    that resistance can develop
  • The available quantities of antiviral for
    prophylaxis
  • Logisitical challenges with providing timely tx.
  • The amount of antivirals used to prevent
    infection in 1 healthcare worker is the
    equivalent of treating 5-7 ill patients
    (prophylaxis w/75mg, BID for 8-10 weeks vs. tx
    with 150mg, BID for five days)

21
Disease Mitigation Measures Feasibility
  • Antivirals (the good news)
  • GlaxoSmithKline believes it has developed a
    vaccine for the H5N1 deadly strain of bird flu
    that may b e capable of being mass produced by
    2007.
  • -The vaccine has proved effective at two doses
    of 3.8micrograms during clinical trials in
    Belgium.
  • Sanofi-Aventis drug company is also working on a
    vaccine.

22
Disease Mitigation Measures Feasibility
  • Use of Isolation
  • With expected shortages of medical beds, home
    isolation of non-critically ill influenza
    patients is a viable option
  • There are several logistical issues that may
    hamper people from being able to remain isolated
    in their home such as the provision of basic
    medical care and obtaining food and supplies.
  • It may not be easy to persuade those without
    paid sick leave (some 59 million persons) to
    absent themselves from work, unless employers
    address this problem directly
  • Inglesby et. al.

23
Disease Mitigation Measures Feasibility
  • Use of Quarantine
  • The aim of voluntary home quarantine is to keep
    possibly contagious, but asymptomatic people out
    of contact with others. This raises both
    practical and ethical issues
  • Community implementation raises issue of levels
    of care and support required
  • Compliance issues Will parents be willing to
    stay home
  • ? What about college issues dorming
  • ? What about the homeless population (750,000)
  • What about the economic concerns of individuals,
    families and the community.
  • Ethical issues
  • Healthy individuals staying with
    infected individuals. Quarantine would prevent
    healthy children from being sent to stay with
    other family
  • members.

24
Disease Mitigation Measures Feasibility
  • Large-Scale Quarantine
  • The World Health Organization (WHO) Writing
    Group, after reviewing the literature and
    considering contemporary international
    experience, concluded that forced isolation and
    quarantine are ineffective and impractical.
    Inglesby, Nusso, OToole and Henderson
  • It is recommended that Large scale quarantine be
    eliminated from consideration.

25
  • 1918 Flu Epidemic Teaching Valuable
    LessonsActions Taken Apparently Were Effective
  • By David Brown
  • Washington Post Staff Writer
  • Wednesday, December 13, 2006 A04
  • New analysis of how American cities responded to
    the killer Spanish flu of 1918 suggests that
    closing schools, banning large gatherings,
    staggering work hours and quarantining households
    of the ill may have saved tens of thousands of
    lives. Which of the many non-pharmaceutical
    interventions was especially effective in
    reducing mortality is unknown, but all would
    theoretically be available should pandemic
    influenza again sweep the country. The new
    findings run counter to previous research that
    concluded that the public health measures
    instituted in 1918 may have delayed or dampened
    the epidemic in many cities but probably had
    little effect on the ultimate death toll. The
    new data were presented this week to Centers for
    Disease Control and Prevention experts, who are
    helping to draw up guidelines for what local
    health departments might do during the early
    stage of an influenza pandemic, when a vaccine
    would be unavailable and there would be too few
    antiviral drugs to go around.
  • "There is reason for optimism. Even almost 100
    years ago, with some very simple tools, there may
    have been an effect of these measures," said
    Martin Cetron, a physician who directs global
    migration and quarantine at the CDC. In 1918,
    the public health responses included isolating
    the ill, quarantining houses, closing schools,
    canceling worship services, restricting the size
    of funerals and weddings, closing saloons and
    theaters, restricting door-to-door sales,
    discouraging the use of public transportation,
    staggering the hours of business and factory
    operations, imposing curfews and, in some places,
    recommending the use of face masks in public.
    Howard Markel, a physician and historian at the
    University of Michigan Medical School, is leading
    a project to analyze the experience of 45
    American cities, looking for relationships among
    flu cases, mortality and public health measures.
  • The researchers used a model to determine what
    the epidemic would have looked like had no
    measures been taken and compared that result with
    a city's actual experience.
  • St. Louis closed its schools at a time when flu
    was causing 21 more deaths per 100,000 people per
    week than what had been seen in previous years.
    That step -- the earliest taken by any of 33
    cities analyzed so far -- appears to have reduced
    St. Louis's flu mortality by 70 percent.
  • Cincinnati responded less quickly, invoking
    public health measures when excess deaths from
    flu were 46 per 100,000. It reduced its potential
    flu mortality by 45 percent.
  • Philadelphia was extremely late, not acting until
    its excess death rate was 250 per 100,000. That
    reduced mortality by 28 percent, Markel and his
    colleagues found.
  • How U.S. communities would react to a sudden
    closure of schools is uncertain, although the
    experience this past fall of one rural
    Appalachian county suggests that there may be
    little opposition over the short term. Yancey
    County, in rural and mountainous western North
    Carolina, closed its 2,559-student school system
    from Nov. 2 to 13 because of an outbreak of
    influenza B. A random survey of households found
    that 91 percent supported the school board's
    decision. In half of those households, all the
    adults worked outside the home. During that
    period, one-quarter of them had to take time off
    from work, mainly because they were ill
    themselves or had to care for a sick family
    member, and not simply to stay with children not
    in school, said April J. Johnson of the CDC's
    Epidemic Intelligence Service, who investigated
    the outbreak. In only two of 220 households did
    adults have to pay for extra child care when
    schools were closed. In most cases, relatives and
    friends stepped in to help, Johnson found.

26
Disease Mitigation Measures Feasibility
  • School Closure
  • The impact of school closings on illness rates
    is mixed.
  • Modeling programs suggest that school closures
    would significantly decrease disease
    transmission. However, closing school for longer
    than the usual periods would impact working
    parents as well as have an adverse impact on the
    29.5 million children who are fed through the
    National School Lunch Program.
  • Additionally if schools are closed so should
    malls, churches, and other gathering sites. If
    all of these sites are closed, how will this
    effect internet use? COOP planning?
  • Legal issues associate prolonged closing of
    schools school board meeting and the need for a
    quorum compensation work assignment of school
    staff adequate instruction time school
    populations with special needs populations
    (IEPs) use of the school as a healthcare
    facility (ACF) financial and governance concerns
    (grants) contracts (performance clauses) and
    parental communications (advance notification on
    prolonged closures). L. Soronen, JD., National
    School Board Association.

27
Containment Units
  • Biocontainment Patient Care Units (BPCU)
  • One approach to containing hazardous infectious
    disease in hospital settings is a BPCU.
  • There are 3 BPCUs in existence in the US
  • Fort Detrick, MD (3 beds)
  • Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia (2
    beds)
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center in Omaha,
    NE (10 beds)

28
BPCU
  • Diseases that could be handled in BPCUs include
  • Smallpox
  • Monkeypox
  • SARS
  • Avian influenza
  • Viral Hemorrhagic Fevers (VHF)

29
BPCUsPsychosocial and Ethical Issues
  • Here are the recommendations made by the panel of
    experts
  • Psychosocial issues should be addressed with the
    patient on a regular basis
  • Counseling support, educ., and discussion with
    the family members are important.
  • Personal items brought into the unit will have to
    be decontaminated or destroyed
  • Psychiatrists should be available for diagnosis
    and management of patients with more complicated
    psychiatric presentations.

30
BPCUsPsychosocial and Ethical Issues for Staff
  • BPCU workers may experience high levels of stress
    and thus MH services should be provided.
  • Staff training is crucial to minimize fears and
    dispel misunderstandings.
  • Ethical Issues
  • A shift away from patient centered ethics to a
    more institution focused ethical standard (i.e.
    reason to withhold/deny medical services)

31
John L. Hick, M.D. Emergency Physician, Hennepin
County Medical Center, Chair, Metropolitan
Hospital Compact
32
Alternative Care Sites
Site Selection Tool www.ahrq.gov/downloads/pub
/biotertools/alttool.xls
33
Risk Communications
  • To the General Public
  • Simplicity
  • Credibility
  • Verifiability
  • Consistency
  • and speed count in an Emergency.
  • The message must be repeated, come from a
    legitimate source, be specific to the emergency,
    and offer a positive course(s) of action.

34
Risk Communications
  • To Staff
  • It is incumbent upon facilities to develop and
    implement effective means to communicate to their
    workers information regarding the outbreak,
    health risks, containment strategy, and measures
    to protect workers, patients, and visitors.

35
Vaccines, Antivirals and Materiel Assets as of
January 5th, 2007
  • Currently available in the SNS
  • Antivirals
  • Tamifu (oseltamivir) 21.6 million regimens with
    an additional 20,500 regimens of oral suspension
  • Relenza (zanamivir) 84,000 regimens
  • Ventilators
  • PPE 49.7 million Surgical masks and 81.5 million
    N95 respirators
  • Additional items that are projected to be
    procured this year (2007) include
  • Antivirals
  • Tamifu (oseltamivir) 7.9 million
  • Relenza (zanamivir) 6 million regimens
  • Additional PPE 1.7 million Surgical masks, 23.4
    million N95 respirators, face shields, gowns and
    gloves
  • Additional ventilators
  • Syringes and needles
  • Prepandemic vaccine is not part of the SNS. It
    was purchased by HHS and is being held by
    manufacturers until needed.

36
Psychological Sequale
  • Traumatic Grief Child and/or Adult
  • Acute Stress Disorder
  • Post traumatic Stress Disorder (9 in GP)
  • Depression
  • Substance Abuse/Substance Withdrawals
  • Exacerbation of pre-existing conditions
  • In some cases alteration in Cognitive abilities.
  • Increased suicide rates
  • Increase in domestic abuse
  • Medication issues

37
Traumatic Grief
  • Grief is not the same for every person.
  • Normal grieving usually includes
  • Social Withdrawal
  • Preoccupation
  • Even painful emotions
  • With time, the intensity of grief subsides
  • Traumatic grief is when the emotions remain high
    and the individual gets stuck somewhere in the
    grieving process.

38
Traumatic Grief Symptoms
  • Recurrent intrusive thoughts of the deceased
  • Intense loneliness for the deceased
  • Intense sadness, irritability, anger, or
    bitterness
  • Persistent feeling of being dazed, or shocked
  • Avoidance of activities that remind you of the
    deceased
  • Avoidance of social gatherings
  • Avoidance of places related to the death
  • Traumatic Grief has sxs of PTSD, anxiety and
    depression that persist over time.

39
Acute Stress Disorder
  • What is an Acute Stress Response?
  • ASR is a transient disorder of significant
    severity which develops in an
  • individual without any other apparent mental
    disorder in response to exceptional
  • physical and/or mental stress and which usually
    subsides within hours or days. The
  • stressor may be an overwhelming traumatic
    experience involving serious threat to the
  • security or physical integrity of the individual
    or of a loved person(s). The symptoms
  • usually appear within minutes of the impact of
    the stressful stimulus or event, and
  • disappear within 2-3 days (often within hours).
    Partial or complete amnesia for the
  • episode may be present. There must be an
    immediate and clear temporal connection between
    the
  • impact of an exceptional stressor and the onset
    of symptoms onset is usually within a few
    minutes,
  • if not immediate. In addition, the symptoms
  • (a) show a mixed and usually changing picture in
    addition to the initial state
  • of "daze", depression, anxiety, anger, despair,
    over activity, and withdrawal may all be seen,
    but no
  • one type of symptom predominates for long
  • (b) resolve rapidly (within a few hours at the
    most) in those cases where
  • removal from the stressful environment is
    possible in cases where the stress

40
Acute Stress Disorder as a Predictor of
Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms
  • Acute stress symptoms were found to be an
    excellent predictor of the subjects'
    posttraumatic stress symptoms 7-10 months after
    the traumatic event.
  • High levels of peritraumatic dissociation and
    acute stress following violent assault are risk
    factors for early PTSD. Identifying acute
    re-experiencing can help the clinician identify
    subjects at highest risk.

41
Pre-disaster Factors for PTSD
  • Gender
  • Women or girls were affected more adversely by
    disasters than were men or boys for which
    women's rates often exceeded men's by a ratio of
    21
  • Age and Experience
  • Middle-aged adults were most adversely
    affected. Professionalism and training
  • increase the resilience of recovery workers,
    although past trauma per se does not.
  • Culture and Ethnicity
  • Majority groups fared better than ethnic
    minority groups. There are culturally specific
    attitudes and beliefs that may prevent
    individuals from seeking help.
  • Socioeconomic Status (SES).
  • Lower SES was consistently associated with
    greater post-disaster distress. The effect of
    SES has been found to grow stronger as the
    severity of exposure increases.
  • Family Factors
  • Married status was a risk factor for women.
    Being a parent also added to the stress of
    disaster recovery, mothers were especially at
    risk for substantial distress. Children were
    highly sensitive to post-disaster distress and
    conflict in the family. When measured, parental
    psychopathology was typically the best predictor
    of child psychopathology.

42
Pre-disaster Functioning and Personality
  • Pre-disaster symptoms were almost always among
    the best predictors (if not the best predictor)
    of post-disaster symptoms. Persons with
    pre-disaster psychiatric histories were
    disproportionately likely to develop
    disaster-specific PTSD and to be diagnosed with
    some type of post-disaster disorder.

43
Within-disaster Factors
  • Bereavement during the disaster,
  • Injury to oneself or a family member,
  • Life threat, panic or similar emotions during the
    disaster,
  • Horror,
  • Separation from family (especially among young
    people)
  • Extensive loss of property, relocation or
    displacement.
  • As the number of these stressors increased, the
    likelihood
  • of psychological impairment increased.

44
Post-disaster Factors
  • Stability versus change in psychological
  • symptoms was largely explained by
  • stability versus change in stress and
  • resources.
  • Attention needs to be paid to stress levels
  • in stricken communities long after the
  • disaster has passed

45
Neurological Disorders Associated With Infectious
Diseases /or Medications Used in Tx Regiments
  • Decreased IQ HIV/AIDS
  • Cryptococcal Meningitis HIV/AIDS
  • Cortical Dementia HIV/AIDS
  • Tuberculosis Dementia excessive alcohol use,
    AIDS, TB
  • Cerebral Toxoplasmosis AIDS
  • Herpes Zoster Shingles
  • Neurosyphylis untreated syphilis

46
Neurological Problems
47
Pre-Planned Response to Funerals
  • Lesson Learned
  • The family of SARS victims often were unable to
    engage in traditional burial rituals. Mourners
    had to stand off in a distance.
  • For some, there was no closure.

48
Behavioral Practice Guidelines
  • Do not provide formal interventions immediately
    after the traumatic event. Perform Psychological
    First Aid (PFA)
  • Screen for risk factors from those who seek
    professional help.
  • Timely symptom based assessment.
  • Provide empirically informed interventions.
  • Attend to traumatic grief.
  • Gray, M Litz, B Behavior
    Modification 2005

49
Outline of Presentation
FINISH
Responder Issues
START
Administrative Issues
Medical Clinical Issues
50
Administrative Issues
  • Maintaining licensing requirements
  • Dealing with travel bans but needing to respond.
  • Keeping income flowing (especially for private
    practitioners)
  • Dealing with Insurance companies and sorting out
    billable services.

51
Outline of Presentation
FINISH
Responder Issues
START
Administrative Issues
Medical Clinical Issues
52
Responder Issues
  • Line of Duty Death
  • Great concerns about the wellbeing of their own
    family and loved ones
  • Forced into new and unfamiliar roles
  • Health care staff accepting an altered level of
    care
  • Triage reversal taking the least sick first
  • Fear of contagion/spreading illness

53
Responder Issues
  • Prolonged separation from family
  • Constant pressure to keep performing
  • A sense of ineffectiveness
  • Extreme fatigue, sadness, etc
  • Dealing with issues one has not inoculated
    oneself for.
  • Stigmatization for oneself or family members
  • Dealing with a mass fatality
  • Impact on special populations, State Hospitals,
    prisons, jails, youth detention facilities, ICE
    detention faculties

54
Questions and/or Comments
55
Presenter Information
  • CAPT Stephen Formanski, Psy. D.
  • United States Public Health Service
  • ASPR/Regional Emergency Coordinator Region 3
  • Merritt Chip Schreiber, Ph. D.
  • Dr. Schreiber is a Reserve Corp Officer in the
    USPHS as well as a UCLA psychologist working
    with the Center for Public Health and Disasters,
    School of Public Health and The National Center
    for Child Traumatic Stress, NPIH/David Geffen
    School of Medicine, UCLA.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com