The need for a 450 GeV beam test area on thermal shock waves for the LHC is well established and acc - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The need for a 450 GeV beam test area on thermal shock waves for the LHC is well established and acc

Description:

... shock waves for the LHC is well established and accepted at the technical level. ... Define detailed work packages and budgets for various groups. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 3
Provided by: christoph443
Category:
Tags: gev | lhc | acc | area | beam | established | need | shock | test | testing | thermal | waves | well

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The need for a 450 GeV beam test area on thermal shock waves for the LHC is well established and acc


1
Wrap Up for Discussion
The need for a 450 GeV beam test area on thermal
shock waves for the LHC is well established and
accepted at the technical level. We propose the
WANF area for setting up a facility for testing
close-beam devices with beam-induced thermal
shock waves, prior to installation into sensitive
accelerator environments. This safe test bed will
address all needs for the nominal/upgraded LHC
beam tests on collimators, absorbers, cables, SC
magnet modules, instrumentation, windows
Radiation and safety aspects have been
considered strong support to move into WANF
instead of irradiating a new tunnel area (e.g.
TT61)! Cost 3.3 MCHF (TL, base facility)
0.5 MCHF (clean-up WANF) 0.6 MCHF (upgrade)
Our goal was 2.0 2.5 MCHF. No cheaper solution
found! Some cost should not be paid by us (WANF
clean-up)!? Possibilities to get additional
budget? Reminder budget phase II collimation
total 5.1 MCHF (CERN) 0.7 MCHF (EU). This
must cover the collimator prototyping work and
the beam test facility! Was defined top-down.
Less than originally hoped from EU.
2
  • Strategic input required before we can invest
    more work.
  • Can the accelerator sector top management
    support
  • The approach taken (test risky elements before
    installation into the LHC, one common beam test
    facility for qualification and analysis of
    different near beam devices).
  • The proposed solution (WANF).
  • If not supported What alternatives should be
    considered?
  • If our proposal is supported, then we suggest to
    move ahead
  • Define detailed work packages and budgets for
    various groups.
  • Start procurement procedures (orders, MS, call
    for tender, ).
  • Agree with SLAC formally on deliverables (pending
    DOE support).
  • Present details in March/April 2009 collimation
    phase II project review for final
    approval.Candidate dates for review March
    19/20 Mar 31/Apr 1 Apr 28/29
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com