Autonomy

About This Presentation
Title:

Autonomy

Description:

Therapeutic Privilege: 'When a doctor decides for a seemingly capable patient ... The Doctor-Patient Relationship ... The doctor takes on the interests of the patient ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:24
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Autonomy


1
Autonomy Paternalism
  • Andrew Latus
  • Ethics/Humanities/Health Law
  • Nov. 14, 2002

2
Objective
  • To connect some of the ideas about autonomy,
    beneficence, and consent that have been raised
    over the course of the term

3
Therapeutic Privilege
  • In 1961, a study revealed that 88 of doctors
    routinely would not tell terminally ill cancer
    patients that they had cancer.
  • Therapeutic Privilege When a doctor decides
    for a seemingly capable patient that it is in the
    patients best interests not to know certain
    information (Doing Right, 79)

4
Paternalism
  • To treat someone paternalistically is to treat
    the person in a way that ignores or discounts
    his/her wishes but aims at promoting the persons
    best interest.
  • Generally, paternalism in medicine is viewed as
    being a bad thing.
  • Question Whats wrong with paternalism?

5
The Trouble with Paternalism
  • Cases of paternalism are cases in which the
    principles of beneficence/non-maleficence win a
    fight with the principle of autonomy.
  • But respecting patient autonomy is widely seen as
    the most important element in the doctor-patient
    relationship.
  • Therefore, paternalism is a bad thing
  • or so the story goes

6
Justifiable Paternalism?
  • In both medical and non-medical contexts, to say
    someone is acting paternalistically is to
    generally to say something bad about that
    persons actions.
  • But there are occasions when paternalistic
    behaviour is appropriate or even required
  • Parenting (Parentalism)
  • Incompetent Friends/Relatives

7
Hard Cases
  • Some of the most difficult cases concern
    circumstances where we are confident that a
    competent friend or family member is going to
    make a bad decision
  • Here, we typically cannot control the persons
    ultimate decision, but would think it wrong not
    to at least try to change the persons mind.
  • I cant let you drop out of med school/go out
    with him/eat that week old pork chop.
  • In these hard cases, some degree of paternalism
    seems appropriate.

8
The Myth of Perfect Autonomy
  • Why is it morally okay to attempt to override
    your friends/family members original intention
    in some cases?
  • Because, despite what philosophers might say
    about the importance of autonomy, we are rarely,
    if ever, wholly rational self-rulers
  • A General Rule of Thumb The further a person
    is, in a particular situation, from being a
    rational self-ruler, the more paternalistic
    behaviour is morally appropriate.

9
Autonomy Paternalism
  • Our typical ways of thinking about
    capacity/competence treat it as an on-off notion.
  • We set a legal line as a cut-off for taking a
    persons desires as authoritative.
  • This is a useful legal device, but it hides the
    morally important fact that capacity comes in
    degrees. Keeping this in mind is crucial if we
    want to understand the proper relationship
    between autonomy and paternalism.

10
The Rule of Justified PaternalismStolen from
Dr. Daryl Pullman
The amount of paternalistic intervention
justified or required, is inversely proportional
to the amount of autonomy present
AUTONOMY
PATERNALISM
11
Autonomy Patients
  • The usual situations in which doctors encounter
    patients are situations that threaten a patients
    ability to function as a rational self-ruler.
  • Lack of understanding
  • Fear
  • Sickness
  • What does this tell us about the place of
    paternalism in the doctor-patient relationship?

12
The Doctor-Patient Relationship
  • Which model of the doctor-patient relationship is
    most appropriate?
  • 1. Pure Paternalism
  • Model Adult-Child (Hippocrates' view?)
  • Doctor as expert
  • Focus is on care, but not autonomy

13
The Doctor-Patient Relationship
  • 2. Technical
  • Model Contractor-client
  • Doctor presents options. Patient decides.
  • Maximum autonomy for patient

14
The Doctor-Patient Relationship
  • 3. Friendship
  • Charles Fried - doctors are "limited,
    special-purpose friends"
  • The doctor takes on the interests of the patient
  • Leaves room for both paternalism and autonomy and
    for varying degrees of both in particular cases
  • A friend will sometimes try to talk you into
    doing something 'for your own good' even if
    that's not what you say you want.

15
The Moral
  • The huge stress placed on patient autonomy may go
    too far.
  • Autonomy is important, but paternalism has got
    too much bad press.
  • Legally, the stress on autonomy makes sense, but
    we should not let it oversimplify the moral
    situation.
  • Corollary the balance between paternalism
    autonomy may be better recognized in practice
    than in theory.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)