Vznam novch evropskch predpisu pro LAA - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 41
About This Presentation
Title:

Vznam novch evropskch predpisu pro LAA

Description:

All information contained herein is to be handled and considered as NEPOOL Proprietary. ... Run-of-River. March 31, 2005 Release. GIS Generator Screen Update ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:44
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 42
Provided by: janfri
Category:
Tags: laa | evropskch | novch | predpisu | pro | vznam

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Vznam novch evropskch predpisu pro LAA


1
New European Regulation Proposals in Light
Aviationupdate Jan FridrichVicepresident LAA
CR , foreign affairs, industryand internal
audit EHPU Annual Meeting, Zurich 1. March 2008

2
European Aviation Environment
EUROPEAN UNION
  • Evropean Parliament
  • The Council of the European Union
  • European Commission
  • EASA European Aviation Savety Agency
  • Regulation (EC) 1592/2002
  • Annex II of Regulation 1592/2002, which defines
    aircraft exempted
  • from EASA responsibility these are in Member
    States
  • juristiction
  • EASA Working Groups (MDM032, M017, atd.)
  • Eurocontrol

3
European Aviation Environment
EUROPEAN ORGANISATIONS
  • EAS Europe Air Sports
  • EMF European Microlight Federation
  • EGU European Gliding Union
  • EHPU European Hang Gliding and Paragliding
    Union
  • IAOPA International Council of Aircraft Owner
    and Pilot Associations
  • ECOGAS European Council of General Aviation
    Support
  • NAA National Aviation Authority

ACTIVE EUROPEAN LIGHT MANUFACTURER ORGANISATION
IS MISSING!!
4
European Aviation Environment
DEPENDS ON YOUR COUNTRY ussually will be
  • Your country Government
  • Ministry of Transport
  • Civil Aviation Agency
  • Ministry of Industry
  • Ministry of Defence
  • Air Accident Investigation Bureau
  • Air Traffic Control Agency
  • National Aeroclub
  • Sport Orgianisations

5
Basic facts about European Union
The European Union (EU) is a family of democratic
European countries, committed to working together
for peace and prosperity. Its member states
have set up common institutions to which they
delegate some of their sovereignty so that
decisions on specific matters of joint interest
can be made democratically at European level.
EU represents today 27 countries with 490 milions
inhabitents
More info in different languages at
http//europa.eu/index_en.htm
6
Organisation of EU
  • The European Parliament
  • The Council of the EU
  • The European Commission
  • Court of Justice
  • Court of Auditors
  • European Economic and Social Committee
  • The Committee of the Regions
  • The European Central Bank
  • The European Investment Bank

7
Organisation of EU
The European Parliament Voice of the people
  • elected every five years by the people of Europe
    .
  • The present parliament, elected in June 2004,
  • it has 785 members from all 27 EU countries
  • The main job of Parliament is to pass European
    laws
  • It shares this responsibility with the Council
    of the EU
  • the proposals for new laws come from the
    European Commission
  • Parliament and Council also share joint
    responsibility for approving the EUs 100
    billion annual budget.

8
Organisation of EU
The European Parliament Voice of the people
  • it has the power to dismiss the European
    Commission
  • Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) do not
    sit in national blocks, but in seven Europe-wide
    political groups
  • The main meetings of the Parliament are held in
    Strasbourg, others in Brussels.
  • Like all other EU institutions, it works in all
    23 official EU languages.
  • The Parliament elects the European Ombudsman,
    who investigates citizens complaints about
    maladministration by the EU institutions.

9
Organisation of EU
The Council of the EU Voice of the Member States
  • shares with Parliament the responsibility for
    passing laws and taking policy decisions
  • It also bears the main responsibility for what
    the EU does in the field of the common foreign
    and security policy and for EU action on some
    justice and freedom issues.
  • The Council consists of ministers from the
    national governments of all the EU countries
  • Meetings are attended by whichever ministers are
    responsible for the items to be discussed
    foreign ministers, ministers of the economy and
    finance, ministers for agriculture and so on, as
    appropriate.

10
Organisation of EU
The Council of the EU Voice of the Member States
  • Each country has a number of votes in the
    Council broadly reflecting the size of their
    population
  • votes are weighted in favour of smaller
    countries
  • Most decisions are taken by majority vote
  • sensitive issues in areas like taxation, asylum
    and immigration, or foreign and security policy,
    require unanimity.
  • Up to four times a year the presidents and/or
    prime ministers of the Member States meet as the
    European Council
  • These summit meetings set overall EU policy.

11
Organisation of EU
The European Commission Promoting the common
interest
  • The European Commission represents and upholds
    the interests of Europe as a whole
  • It is independent of national governments
  • It drafts proposals for new European laws, which
    it presents to the European Parliament and the
    Council
  • It manages the day-to-day business of
    implementing EU policies and spending EU funds
  • The Commission also keeps an eye out to see that
    everyone abides by the European treaties and
    laws.
  • It can act against rule-breakers, taking them to
    the Court of Justice if necessary.

12
Organisation of EU
The European Commission Promoting the common
interest
  • The Commission consists of 27 women and men
    one from each EU country
  • They are assisted by about 24 000 civil
    servants, most of whom work in Brussels
  • The President of the Commission is chosen by EU
    governments and endorsed by the European
    Parliament
  • The other commissioners are nominated by their
    national governments in consultation with the
    in-coming President, and must be approved by the
    Parliament
  • They do not represent the governments of their
    home countries
  • Instead, each of them has responsibility for a
    particular EU policy area.

13
European Aviation Safety Agency EASA
  • In July 2002 the EU Council and Parliament have
    decided to apply common rules to aviation and to
    establish EASA
  • Objectives ensure a high and uniform level of
    protection of the European citizen and facilitate
    free movement of goods persons and services
  • EASA is operational since September 2003
  • EASA is located in Cologne
  • Staff 350 people
  • Website www.easa.eu.int

14
The Basic Regulation 1592/2002
  • The Basic regulation of EASA is Regulation (EC)
    1592/2002
  • Basic regulations are not converted into national
    laws and apply directly
  • Principles (scope, objectives, definitions)
  • Substantive requirements (basic principles,
    applicability, airworthiness, environmental
    protection, operations and licensing, recognition
    of certificates, etc)
  • Organisation of EASA (tasks, internal structure,
    working methods, financial requirements, final
    provisions)

15
Chronological order of EASA tasks
  • Certification (initial airworthiness)
  • Maintenance (continuing airworthiness)
  • Licensing (pilot proficiency) and medical
  • Operations
  • Short term Airport Operations
  • Long term Air Traffic Services

16
Annex II of Regulation 1592/2002
  • Defines the aircraft excluded from the Regulation
    1592/2002
  • These aircraft remain under national jurisdiction

17
Rulemaking
  • 3 types of regulation
  • Basic Regulation (1592) with Essential
    Requirements (ER), adopted by the Parliament
    (Hard Law)
  • Implementing Rules (IR), adopted by the
    Commission
  • Certification Specifications (CS), Acceptable
    means of compliance (AMC) and Guidance Material
    (GM) adopted by EASA (Soft Law)

18
Existing regulation structure
A N N E X II
19
Rulemaking Procedure
  • For any change in Reg 1592 (Essential
    Requirements), EASA must issue a Notice of
    Proposed Amendment (NPA) and/or a Regulatory
    Impact Assessment (RIA)
  • Stakeholders (we!) must be consulted
  • Evaluation of the answers by an independent WG
  • EASA issues a Comment Response Document (CRD)
  • Stakeholders may comment again
  • EASA issues an Opinion (draft of the new
    regulation) which is submitted to the European
    Commission
  • The Commission issues a communication to the
    Council of Ministers and to the European
    Parliament, stating if they accept or reject the
    proposal
  • If accepted the amendment is submitted to the
    Council and to the Parliament (Co-decision
    process)
  • Publication of the new regulation in the Official
    Journal of EU
  • Process looks like democratic but it is very time
    consuming!

20
Working Group MDM032
  • MDM032 ( Multi Disciplinary Measure) was created
    by EASA at the end of 2005
  • The task is to prepare the concept for the
    regulation of aircraft other than complex motor
    powered aircraft, used in non commercial
    activities
  • Air sports are represented in the working group
  • 17 members secretary
  • EASA, EAS, ECOGAS, IAOPA and NAA are represented
  • EAS is represented by
  • Rudi Schuegraf, EAS Program Manager
  • Hans Akerstedt - Baloons
  • Jan Fridrich EMF
  • Bertrand Taddei - EMF
  • Graham Newby PFA
  • David Roberts EGU
  • Roland Stuck - EGU

21
Working Group MDM032
  • Tasks
  • Develop the concept of a regulation for these
    aircraft (similar to LSA ?)
  • Develop Implementation Rules for the recreational
    PPL
  • Develop Implementation Rules for the operations
  • Rethink the implementation means today applied in
    airworthiness. Adjustment to ER and development
    of different IR for airworthiness
  • If needed propose a modification of Annex II of
    Reg 1592

22
Work of MDM032
  • 16 working 2-3 days meetings since March 2006
  • At the beginning there was a lot of enthusiasm
  • At the first meeting we were told we were in
    front of a blank sheet of paper.  Do not refrain
    to be creative 
  • Brain storming phase
  • Most of the members prepared and presented their
    proposals
  • We lost much time in finding an appropriate
    procedure
  • Most of the discussion was about Initial
    Airworthiness and fighting for 600kg LSA
    category
  • Scope of view has been more and more restricted
  • Result in August EASA issued A-NPA 14-2006 with
    the first proposals

23
A-NPA 14 proposed options
  • Initial airworthiness 3 options
  • relaxation of the existing system
  • design of all aircraft with MTOM lt 2000 kg
    remains fully under EASA control.
  • industry monitoring
  • most of EASA duties from option 1 will be
    transferred to the manufacturers. EASA will keep
    the rightto issue airworthiness directives in
    order to solve dangerous situations which were
    not cared properly by the designer
  • industry monitoring with self declaration
  • This variant is based on Option 2, but it is
    introducing new subcategory for aircraft with
    MTOM les than 750 kg. For this weight limit the
    designer can declare conformity with existing
    Industry standards..

24
A-NPA 14 Evaluation
  • 4400 answers were received (mail box filling!)
  • Entering in a data base
  • In general agreement with the proposals
  • Reorientation of the work for MDM032
  • - Modification of the ToR of MDM 032 (ToR
    Terms of Reference)
  • - Creation of a subgroup Recreational
    licensing (RS)
  • - Creation of a subgroup Non JAR (ICAO)
    licensing (PP)
  • - Creation of a subgroup Ops (DR)
  • - Creation of a subgroup Certification
  • - Creation of a subgroup for LSA like a/c
  • Finalisation of the proposals
  • NPA to be published at November 2007

25
MDM032 Proposals
Initial Airworthiness - Certification
  • Analysis of the comments to the A-NPA
  • a preference for Option 1 for aircraft up to
    2000 kg
  • a preference for Option 3 for the lower end of
    the weight
  • spectrum, relating more to the LSA, VLA and
    sailplane
  • categories.
  • Therefore it is proposed a solution close to
    Option 3 for aircraft below 1000 kg and nearer to
    Option 1 for aircraft between 1000-2000 kg.
  • new process for the European Light Aircraft
    (ELA) is proposed
  • ELA is not a category it is a certification
    process!
  • for non-complex aircraft

26
MDM032 Proposals
Initial Airworthiness - Certification
ELA 2 simplified process for aircraft with MTOM
lt 2000 Kg - Alternative Procedures to DOA will
apply although the applicant may elect to have a
higher design approval. - possibility to have
combined DOA and POA Applicable to A
non-complex aeroplane with MTOM less than
2000kg A balloon A hot-air airship A
non-complex gas airship not more than 7500 m3
maximum design lifting gas volume A very light
rotorcraft An engine installed in aircraft
referred to in this paragraph A propeller
installed in aircraft referred to in this
paragraph.
27
MDM032 Proposals
Initial Airworthiness - Certification
ELA 1 Substantially simplified processes for
aircraft with MTOM lt 1000 Kg Applicable to A
non-complex aeroplane, sailplane or powered
sailplane with a Maximum Take-Off Mass (MTOM)
less than 1000kg A balloon with a maximum
design lifting gas or hot air volume of not more
than defined volumes An airship designed for
not more than two occupants and a maximum design
lifting gas or hot-air volume of not more than
defined volumes An engine installed in
aircraft referred to in this paragraph A
propeller installed in aircraft referred to in
this paragraph
28
MDM032 Proposals
Initial Airworthiness - Certification
ELA 1 Substantially simplified processes for
aircraft with MTOM lt 1000 Kg Qualified entities
(QE) carry out most of the functions currently
carried out by EASA/NAA - Approval of
certification programme by EASA (competent
authority or QE) in lieu of DOA or alternative
procedure to DOA - EASA will issue design
approval documents (TC major mods approval, STCs)
on the basis of recommendation from QEs - QE
for design issues are appointed by EASA (may be
specialised) - QEs supervise design and
production, issue CofA and audit design
production organisation - Industry standards
may be used for design and production (ASTM
International F2245, OSTIV)
29
MDM032 Proposals
Initial Airworthiness - Certification
ELA 1 Substantially simplified processes for
aircraft with MTOM lt 1000 Kg Applicant for
Type Certificate can choose from the following
design codes - CS-23 normal category
aircraft - CS-22 - sailplanes - CS-VLA VLA
aircraft MTOM 850kg and 3 persons on board -
CS-LSA LSA airplane up to MTOM 600kg, max.
two seats stall speed in landing configuration
45kt CAS, no limitation on propeller and
undercarriage, possibility to use ASTM
International F2245
30
MDM032 Proposals
Maintenance
  • A relaxation of Part M has been worked out by the
    working group M 017 under supervision of MDM 032
  • Mission
  • - Evaluation of the answers to NPA 07-05 CRD
    (ie answers to 1,5 years old questions!!!)
  • - Simplification of Part M
  • In May 2007 EASA published the CRD of NPA 07-05
  • In June 2007 EASA published NPA 2007-08 which is
    a combined NPA on Part M and Pilot Owner
    Maintenance (144 pages !)
  • Creation of a Part 66  light  licenses

31
MDM032 Proposals
Maintenance
  • Proposals included in the NPA 2007-08 with
    deadline for answering 13.October 2007
  • Unsuitable for sports and recreational aviation
  • LAA and EMF rejected in their answers
    implementation of Part M for aircraft at least in
    ELA 1 process
  • We consider current maintenance process used in
    the microlight world which is based on owner
    maintenance according to the maintenace manuals
    issued by aircraft manufactrures with inspections
    by association technical inspectors is sufficient

32
MDM032 Proposals
Licensing not approved yet!
  • Creation of a Light Aircraft Pilot License / LAPL
  • LAPL categgory rating
  • - LAPL (A) for airplane
  • - LAPL (G) for gliders
  • - LAPL (B) for baloons
  • - LAPL (H) for helicopters
  • Common theoretical syllabus
  • Cross crediting of hours 
  • Modular approach
  • Bridge to PPL
  • Minimal age16 years

33
MDM032 Proposals
Licensing not approved yet!
  • LAPL(A) proposal not yet approved by EASA
  • Basic LAPL(A)
  • for aeroplanes are to fly single engine piston
    aeroplanes or touring motor gliders (TMG) with a
    maximum certificated take off mass of 2000 kg or
    less
  • carrying a maximum of 1 passenger
  • in local flights within no more than 50 KM from
    the aerodrome of departure, with no intermediate
    landings
  • Training
  • Applicants for the Basic LAPL(A) shall have
    completed at least 20 hours of fligth instruction
    in aeroplanes or TMG, including at least
  • - 10 hours of dual instruction
  • - 4 hours of supervised solo flight time
  • - 3 hours of navigation training

34
MDM032 Proposals
Licensing not approved yet!
  • LAPL(A) proposal not yet approved by EASA
  • LAPL(A)
  • for aeroplanes are to fly single engine piston
    aeroplanes or TMG with a maximum certificated
    take off mass of 2000 kg or less
  • carrying a maximum of 3 passengers, such that
    there are never more than 4 persons on board of
    the aircraft
  • Training
  • Applicants for a LAPL(A) shall have
    completed on aeroplanes or TMG at least
  • - 15 hours of dual instruction and
  • - 6 hours of supervised solo flight time,
    including at least 3 hours of solo cross-country
    flight time with at least 1 cross-country flight
    of at least 150 km, during which 1 full stop
    landing at an aerodrome different from the
    aerodrome of departure shall be made

35
MDM032 Proposals
Licensing not approved yet!
  • LAPL(A) proposal not yet approved by EASA
  • LAPL(A)
  • Training
  • Applicants for a LAPL(A) holding a Basic
    LAPL(A) shall undertake a course of training
    consisting of at least 10 hours flight
    instruction, including at least
  • - 6 hours of dual instruction,
  • - 3 hours of supervised solo flight time,
    including 1 cross-country flight of at least 150
    km, during which 1 full stop landing at an
    aerodrome different from the aerodrome of
    departure shall be made

36
MDM032 Proposals
Licensing not approved yet!
  • Medical assessment (proposal by DR Hunter)
  • Examination by a doctor (AME or General Medical
    Practitioner)
  • Doctors qualifications are defined
  • A medical report form details the standard
  • Form consists of yes/no responses, data can be
    easily managed on a computer data base
  • The examination does not need aviation medicine
    speciality
  • Knowledge of patient history or verification
  • Declaration of truth by the pilot
  • Periodicity lighter than ICAO Class 2(one single
    examination if age below 45, every 5 years
    between 45-65, yearly over 65)
  • Standards not higher than ICAO Class 2

37
MDM032 Proposals
Licensing not approved yet!
  • When will all this become effective?
  • Depends on the political process (adoption of COM
    579)
  • Assuming the Parliament and the Council will
    agree in March 2008 (second reading) the
    timeschedule could look like this
  • - 3 months consultation period for the NPA - June
    2008- 2 months to prepare CRD - Sep 2008-
    Opinion published - Jan 2009- Regulation
    effective - Jan 2010

38
MDM032 Proposals
Operations
  • Essential Requirements (ER) for Ops are
    sufficient. There will be Implementation Rules
    (IR) only for
  • -   COM/NAV Equipment
  • -   Safety Equipment
  • - Fuel reserves for powered aircraft
  • Problems with activities which may be considered
    as semi- commercial or aerial work (aero towing,
    sight-seing flights also with training flights
    and hiring..)

39
Conclusion
  • EASA has a positive attitude towards Air Sports
  • They accept EAS as competent partner
  • They are ready to accept some degree of self
    management
  • but
  • The regulative process is slow
  • We are in the middle of a power battle between
    NAAs and EASA
  • We need more lobbying at the Parliament and at
    the Council level

40
What does it mean for us
  • EASA solution
  • Better for those ho are currently under NAA
    systems
  • Complicated system, not suitable for small
    companies
  • definition of commercial activities needs to be
    changed
  • Part M as currently proposed is unusable for
    light aviation
  • not sure if the whole system certification,
    maintenace, licencing and operations will work as
    complete system for light aviation

No solution will come to force earlier than by
the end of 2009!
41
I just hope that we will not end up as the pilot
on the picture.. Thank You for Your
attention! WWW.LAACR.CZ
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com