Redbud Presentation to Utility Operating Committee - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 8
About This Presentation
Title:

Redbud Presentation to Utility Operating Committee

Description:

Independent Evaluator Role and Comments. For the Oklahoma Gas and Electric ... Carrie Gilbert and other La Capra Associates employees. New Energy Opportunities, Inc. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:83
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: Bowe5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Redbud Presentation to Utility Operating Committee


1
Independent Evaluator Role and Comments For the
Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company Wind Energy
RFP
Technical Conference Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Presented by La Capra Associates, Inc. New
Energy Opportunities, Inc.
Presented to
January 9, 2009
2
OVERVIEW
  • Independent Evaluator (IE) Functions in RFP
    Process
  • IE Comments on Draft RFP
  • IE for this RFP Who We Are
  • Interest in Prospective Bidder Comments

2
3
IE Functions for Wind Energy RFP
  • RFP design process
  • Advise utility
  • Comment on draft RFP
  • Assist in consideration of comments from
    interested parties
  • Prior to evaluation of bids
  • Work with OGE to refine evaluation methodology,
    criteria, assumptions
  • QA Review utility draft answers to bidder
    questions
  • Bid evaluation
  • Independently evaluate bids/review utility bid
    evaluation
  • If there is disagreement regarding winning
    bid(s),
  • Utility determines winning bidder(s)
  • IE submits its evaluation to OCC
  • Subject to OCC determination

3
4
Comments on Draft RFP
  • IE comments posted on OGE website
  • Potential bids
  • Power purchase agreements (PPAs)/WEPAs 20-year
    terms sought
  • Utility-owned generation (UOG)where OGE may
    recover costs under cost-of-service ratemaking
  • Utility acquires wind energy development assets
    from third party, with engineering, procurement
    and construction agreement (EPC) OR
  • Utility self-build
  • Objective appropriate comparison of WEPA and UOG
    bids
  • UOGsaccuracy and reasonableness of estimates
  • Differences in risk allocation between
    fixed-price /MWh bids (WEPAs) vs. bids based on
    estimated costs and projected output (UOGs)

4
5
Comments on Draft RFPcontd.
  • Issues with Estimates UOG bids
  • Estimated output (MWh)
  • Actual performance has historically been 10
    below estimated performance
  • UOG bids should provide best available estimates,
    with references to analyses and data regarding
    historical underperformance
  • IE will adjust estimated performance if necessary
    to assure credible estimates
  • Overly optimistic energy projections will result
    in reduced non-price score
  • Unscheduled maintenance
  • Risk-adjustment of estimated energy prices price
    firmness
  • Output
  • Capital costs
  • Operating costs
  • Production tax credit (PTC) risks
  • Utilization of PTC
  • Loss of federal PTC due to project delay

5
6
Comments on Draft RFPcontd.
  • Issue Term of evaluation for assessing levelized
    estimated cost of energy
  • 20-year WEPA bids soughtterm of evaluation20
    years
  • At time our comments were prepared, with respect
    to UOG bids, OGE had not decided whether to use
  • 25-year useful life/book depreciation with
    25-year evaluation term (which IE had concerns
    with) OR
  • 20-year book depreciation with 20-year evaluation
    term
  • OGE has now decided to use 20-year book
    depreciation with 20-year evaluation term for
    purposes of bid evaluation IE concurs

6
7
Independent Evaluator for this RFP
  • La Capra Associates, Inc. (La Capra Associates)
  • John Athas, Managing Consultant
  • Carrie Gilbert and other La Capra Associates
    employees
  • New Energy Opportunities, Inc. (NEO)
  • Barry Sheingold, President, NEO
  • La Capra Associates/NEO collaborations Similar
    roles or advising on renewable energy RFPs
  • Delaware
  • Massachusetts
  • New York
  • Rhode Island
  • Other RFP experience CA, OK, HI, UT, OR, AZ

Independent Evaluator
7
8
Interest in Prospective Bidder Comments
  • Areas of particular interest
  • Reasonableness of requirement that proposed
    projects have a scheduled commercial operation
    date by 12/31/2010
  • Impact of current financial environment on RFP
  • We are interested in your comments and questions
  • Your input is important to the process
  • Please send copies of your comments to
  • John Athas, La Capra Associates, Inc.
    jathas_at_lacapra.com
  • Barry Sheingold, New Energy Opportunities, Inc.
    bjs_at_newenergyopps.com
  • This is an update to the names in the draft RFP
    Section 2.1

8
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com