Social Inequality and Consumer Culture - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Social Inequality and Consumer Culture

Description:

Social Inequality and Consumer Culture ' ... 'The culture industry perpetually cheats its consumers of what it perpetually promises. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:550
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: FayeLin
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Social Inequality and Consumer Culture


1
Social Inequality and Consumer Culture
  • The promise held out by the work of art that it
    will create truth by lending new shape to the
    conventional social forms is as necessary as it
    is hypocritical. Adorno and Horkheimer, 1944

2
Three Perspectives on Consumer Culture
  • 1) Consumer culture is premised upon the
    expansion of capitalist commodity production. As
    a result material culture has expanded. This
    means increasing capacity for ideological
    manipulation.
  • 2) Goods act primarily as markers of status and
    the satisfaction given by goods is related to
    this.
  • 3) Consumption provides emotional, bodily, and
    aesthetic pleasure.

3
Critiques of Consumer Culture
  • The commodity logic and instrumental rationality
    manifest in the sphere of production is
    noticeable in the sphere of consumption.
  • Leisure is filtered through the culture
    industry.

4
Use Value?
  • Once the dominance of exchange-value of goods,
    the commodity becomes free to take up a secondary
    or ersatz use-value. (Rose, 1978, p. 25)

5
The Culture Industry Enlightenment as Mass
Deception
  • Adorno and Horkheimer apply Marxs theory of
    alienation to consumers.
  • Just as workers become passive, dominated
    subjects, so do consumers.
  • Consumption becomes work.
  • Alienation from process, from product purchased,
    from community of fellows, from self.

6
Adorno and Horkheimers Critique
  • The dumbing down of culture.
  • The objectification of the consumer

7
  • The people at the top are no longer so
    interested in concealing monopoly as its
    violence becomes more open, so its power grows.
    Movies and radio need no longer pretend to be
    art. The truth that they are just business is
    make into an ideology in order to justify the
    rubbish they deliberately produce. (Adorno and
    Horkheimer, 1944 p. 3)

8
All that is Solid Melts Into Air
  • The culture industry appropriates (and thereby
    destroys) traditional and high culture.
  • Wagners Ride of the Valkyrie is associated
    with a Bugs Bunny Cartoon (Kill the Rabbit, Kill
    the Rabbit)
  • Tradition become Archie Bunker
  • The Beatles Revolution is used to sell shoes.

9
Governmental Control
  • While enacted in the name of the people, it also
    silences the public.
  • Official broadcasting- cost of access is
    prohibitive
  • Supersize Me example- advertising of candy versus
    fruits and vegetables
  • Censorship

10
Market Control
  • People with varied needs and interests become
    demographics.
  • Results in propaganda.
  • How salient are these groupings to identity?

11
The Banality of Market Culture
  • Art becomes artifice- it is produced to market to
    a demographic.
  • Recycled culture
  • Filters all
  • Movie Syndrome (Real life is indistinguishable
    from the movies)

12
  • The culture industry perpetually cheats its
    consumers of what it perpetually promises.
    (Adorno and Horkheimer, 1944)

13
  • The deception is not that the culture industry
    supplies amusement but that it ruins the fun by
    allowing business considerations to involve it in
    the ideological clichés of a culture in the
    process of self-liquidation. Ethics and taste
    cut short unrestrained amusement as naïve
    naïveté is thought to be as bad as
    intellectualism- and even restrict technical
    possibilities. (Adorno and Horkheimer, 1944)

14
Galbraiths Dependence Effect
  • Desires must be created to ensure demand.
  • One cannot defend production as satisfying wants
    if that production creates the wants.
    (Galbraith, 1958)
  • How is want made into need?

15
Stuart Ewen
  • The Seduction of Advertising.
  • We are shown idealized images and promised that
    they lie just outside our grasp.

16
Endless Options
  • Style- is used as a means to seduce the consumer.
  • Consumers are seduced to adopt preferences for
    products that are actually interchangeable.
    (Coke or Pepsi, Sprite or 7-Up, Panasonic or
    Sony)
  • Promise of social mobility- you can be whoever
    you want to be.

17
Marketing Social Justice
  • Lifestyles become a marketable commodity.
  • Social Justice becomes about your jeans.
  • The Empty Promise of Transgression

18
The Flaws with the Critiques
  • There is some better, more authentic way of life,
    that is blocked by corporate power.
  • The aesthetics of mass culture are problematic.
    (Its tacky).

19
  • Consumption and bodies became central to the
    development and social display of identity.

20
Consumption and Social Inequality
  • Consumption and Status
  • Material advantages (health, nutrition)
  • Conspicuous Consumption
  • The Embodiment of Social Inequality

21
Status and Consumption
  • Thornstein Veblen (1899)- In modern society,
    wealth (rather than military prowess) had become
    the basis of social esteem.
  • Because wealth is difficult to measure,
    conspicuous consumption becomes the means of
    determining social hierarchies.
  • Consumption is a means of communication.

22
(No Transcript)
23
The New Inequality
  • The top 1 percent of households now own about 40
    percent of all wealth, and the top 20 percent are
    responsible for half the countrys consumer
    spending.

24
  • Bourdieu (1984) notes that the body is not simply
    a surface to be read, but is a three dimensional
    expression of social relations that take the form
    of corporeal or mental schema, referred to as
    habitus (Bourdieu, 1984).
  • Through the process of routine symbolic
    consumption, identity is constructed and
    embodied.

25
  • Bourdieu (1984) notes through daily practice
    taste is inscribed upon the body, and therefore,
    taste denotes class status. Ones taste serves
    as a marker of social status and creates a shared
    experience of class identity.

26
Distinction
  • Taste is one aspect of the reproducing of class
    differences.
  • Consumer tastes vary in predictable ways, and
    depend on the cultural capital of the
    individual.
  • Taste becomes a means of assuring ones social
    and economic place.

27
  • Those high in cultural capital apply a formal
    aesthetic sensibility to their consumption of
    food, décor, and mass media, in contrast to the
    functional aesthetic (emphasis on qualities such
    as durability) of low cultural capital consumers.
    (Schor and Holt).
  • Visible symbols of status are still salient.

28
  • Other authors have applied similar principles to
    studying other facets of identity such as gender
    and/or race.
  • The cultural capital conferred by ones taste
    reveals relations of power and privilege.
  • How ones physical abilities, tastes and
    proclivities are read and valued by the larger
    society structures opportunities.
  • Those in dominant groups are much more effective
    at having their own bodies defined as superior,
    legitimate, healthy, and/or normal.

29
  • Drawing on Marxist perspectives, the
    fetishization of bodies ultimately leads to the
    reproduction of socially unequal bodies.
  • The bodies of the privileged are legitimated and
    idealized through participation in rituals of
    consumption.
  • Non-dominant or othered bodies are rendered
    invisible, undesirable, and affixed with markers
    of stigma.
  • The under-representation of and limited roles
    given to people of color in the mass media
    demonstrates invisibility, while the common
    conflation of gay and AIDS provides an example of
    stigma (Dworkin Wachs, 1998).

30
The Body- A Critique
  • Through goods, services, and rituals of display
    ones body is part of an endless tyranny of
    marketplace definition.
  • The consumer begins to see his/her body as an
    alien object, that must be constantly managed to
    preserve ones position and identity.
  • He or she is not tyrannized by an outsider, but
    becomes engaged in endless rituals of
    self-surveillance guided by idealized marketplace
    images conveyed through the mass media (Bordo,
    1993).
  • Media forces, in particular advertising, conspire
    to simultaneously create a culture of lack and an
    endless array of products to assuage the lack, or
    at least the stigma of it (Kilbourne, 1999).

31
  • Particularly troubling is the normalization of a
    limited idealized range of images unattainable to
    most.
  • The few who approach the ideal are subject to a
    litany of practices designed to stave off
    inevitable failure (Bartky, 1988).
  • Recent research demonstrates that male consumers
    are also now subject to increasing
    objectification (Pope et. Al, 2000).
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com