SMIv3 Open Issues - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

SMIv3 Open Issues

Description:

Too disruptive to redefine VAR using a different TYPE ... Need to change SYNTAX of a VAR or TYPE attribute (inner node) to achieve the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:41
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: ABB77
Learn more at: https://www.ietf.org
Category:
Tags: issues | open | smiv3 | var

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: SMIv3 Open Issues


1
SMIv3 Open Issues
  • Andy Bierman ltabierman_at_cisco.comgt

2
SMIv3 Open Issue List
  • NULL choice for UNION TYPEs
  • OID naming for aggregates and sub-aggregates
  • NOTIFICATION definitions in TYPEs
  • Inline vs. by-reference TYPEs and VARs
  • Descriptor naming issues for TYPEs
  • Conformance section changes to support SMIv3
  • Change control issues for VARs
  • SMI syntax changes
  • Migration of SMIv2 CLRs to SMIv3
  • Support for Configuration
  • Support for XML naming, XSD translation
  • Support for COPS-PR

3
NULL choice for UNION TYPEs
  • Allow UNION definitions to contain a special
    attribute (node) that would not result in any
    accessible sub-tree in a VAR declaration
  • Details
  • Named attribute (name could be reserved keyword
    like null or no different than other attribute
    descriptors)
  • SYNTAX could be special keyword NULL
  • MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
  • Example use
  • Create a template for a generic RMON control
    entry, in which some attributes are not present
    in specific functions e.g., entriesRequested/entr
    iesGranted pair used in host or matrix control
    entry, but not etherStats control entry.
  • Issues
  • How to document in VAR declaration that NULL is
    used
  • How to document requirements in the Conformance
    section

4
OID naming for aggregates and sub-aggregates
  • Want to allow for protocol operations on all or
    part of nested data structures
  • Problem
  • How to tell where static OID components end and
    instance identifier components begin
  • Proposal from Interim
  • First component from left with a value of zero
    marks end of static portion
  • Only applies if number of static components
    present actually less than defined in MIB
    otherwise first zero component (if any) is
    interpreted as an instance component
  • Issues
  • Backward compatibility does this break any real
    implementations?
  • Should this be handled in EOS (forget SNMPv3)?

5
NOTIFICATION definitions in TYPEs
  • Proposal from NMRG to place notification
    definitions inside STRUCT, ARRAY or UNION TYPEs,
    instead of independent NOTIFICATION declaration
    (as we have now)
  • Issues
  • Multiple instances dont make sense What is the
    OID for a notification inside an ARRAY?
  • Notifications not always tied to a single data
    structure
  • What problem does this actually solve?

6
Inline vs. by-reference TYPEs and VARs
  • Proposal to disallow inline constructs This
    forces all nested types to be previously declared
    as a named (reusable) type
  • Issues
  • Assumes all constructs will be reusable
  • Creates complexity when adding new attributes to
    an existing data object
  • Cant add attributes to a VAR declaration
  • Have to add attributes to a TYPE definition, but
    the new objects may not be needed by every
    instance of that type
  • Too disruptive to redefine VAR using a different
    TYPE
  • Need to specify details of each VAR in the
    conformace section
  • Can make MIBs harder to read by spreading out
    details

7
Descriptor naming issues for TYPEs
  • Assumption that descriptors are unique within a
    module
  • This is no longer true for descriptors in
    reusable types
  • Not even desirable, since descriptor names are
    too hard to read with long prefix strings
  • Issues
  • Can the naming rules for descriptors be changed
  • Longer maximum value (remove SHOULD be lt 32)
  • Require uniqueness only within scope of the
    parent node
  • Allow XML style names mixed case with hyphens

8
Conformance section changes to support SMIv3
  • Existing MODULE-COMPLIANCE macro wont work for
    SMIv3 objects
  • Descriptors are not unique within the module
  • Existing problems with SMIv2 need to be fixed,
    like OBJECT clauses for INDEX objects
  • Need to create a construct for each complex VAR
    declaration
  • Could fully specify attribute names would be
    better to have a shorthand notation

9
Change control issues for VARs
  • Need to be able to add new attributes to existing
    VAR, just as we add new columns to an existing
    table now
  • Create new type which superset of old type and
    allow VAR SYNTAX to change
  • Use conformance section for version
    identification
  • Need to change SYNTAX of a VAR or TYPE attribute
    (inner node) to achieve the same affect as above
  • Replace FooType with BarType, which is a superset
    of FooType

10
SMI syntax changes
  • Many syntax changes proposed by SMING at last
    interim Need to decide, case by case
  • IMPORTS
  • LEAF, NODE, or ATTRIBUTE
  • OBJECT-GROUP -gt GROUP
  • NOTIFICATION-GROUP -gt GROUP
  • Base type names
  • Remove MODULE this module
  • Comments
  • More?

11
Migration of SMIv2 CLRs to SMIv3
  • Need to determine which SMI rules and
    restrictions need to be kept, modified, or
    deleted
  • 128 sub-identifier limit
  • 32 character name limit
  • Type name, counter name rules
  • Need to raise MAX-ACCESS of objects
  • Use MIN-ACCESS in conformance section for
    backward compatibility
  • More
  • Put the CLRs in a separate document (BCP)

12
Support for Configuration
  • Need mechanism to distinguish object type
  • Configuration (e.g., acl list, bgp peer,
    users/passwords)
  • Control (e.g., per-session debug commands, reset
    card)
  • State (e.g., ifOperStatus)
  • Statistics (e.g., ifInOctets)
  • Need mechanism to describe high-level
    configuration methods
  • Could be purely for documentation
  • Could be more, such as the minimum procedural
    requirements for a particular task
  • Mechanism to describe what has to be created in
    initial PDU, what can be edited after creation,
    cascading deletion order, etc.

13
Support for XML naming, XSD translation
  • Need to identify XML Namespace for MIB
  • Optional XML-NAMESPACE ltURIgt clause in
    MODULE-IDENTITY, or use XML namespace as the
    MODULE name
  • Need to identify XML element names
  • Optional XML-NAME string clause in TYPE or VAR
    constructs
  • Used to override descriptor as element name
  • Need to map ARRAY population characteristics to
    minOccurs, maxOccurs attributes

14
Support for COPS-PR
  • Need to map MIB objects to COPS-PR
  • Forget the idea of supporting SPPI map SMIv3 MIB
    objects directly to COPS-PR (already decided to
    do this)
  • Must be more things needed
  • Need COPS-PR experts to work on the problem
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com