Title: Executive Functions, g, Fluid Reasoning, and Working Memory
1Executive Functions, g, Fluid Reasoning, and
Working Memory
2Brief Background
Georgia State University
3Purpose
- Collaborative research
- Intelligence (g, Gf), Working Memory, Executive
Functions are all related and constitute core
functions in intelligence - IQ tests dont measure executive functions, thus
dont measure intelligence - Theoretical speculation
4Overview
- School Psychology -overview
- What is intelligence and higher cognitive
abilities - 6,292,930 children in special ed.(Digest of
Educational Statistics, 2002), many of which
receive IQ tests - Intelligence Testing
- Binet, Terman, Yerkes, Wechsler, Spearman,
Cattell, etc.
5History of Intelligence Theory
- Intelligence as a single general ability
(Spearman) - Intelligence as a pair of abilities
(verbal-nonverbal) - Intelligence as a limited set of multiple
abilities - Intelligence as a complete set of multiple
abilities (Cattell-Horn) - Intelligence as a hierarchy of narrow abilities
underlying multiple broad abilities (Carroll)
6CHC Model
Wheres Executive Functions?
7g
- Empirically based
- Represents the shared commonality of all measures
of cognitive ability. - Difficult to interpret
- Why are all tests of cognitive ability positively
correlated? - Jensen
- Most important construct in psychology
- Nerve conduction velocity, based on RT studies
8Interpreting g
- g-loaded tests involve complex cognitive
operations such as reasoning and abstraction that
is based on the complexity of the mental
operations rather than specific knowledge in a
given area (Arend et al., 2002 Jensen, 1998
Spilsbury, 1992). - Spearman
- Intelligence is induction of relationships/correla
tes, mental energy
9G and fluid intelligence
- Fluid reasoning
- Highest/indistinguishable loading on g
- inductive and deductive reasoning
- Ravens Progressive Matrices developed to
measure g, rooted in biology.
10(No Transcript)
11Information ProcessingWM and Fluid Reasoning
- Reasoning ability and g is working memory
- Kyllonen, (1996) Kyllonen, Christal, R. E.
(1990) - Working memory and fluid reasoning are associated
(Engle, Tuholski, Laughlin, Conway, 1999) - g on a working memory factor to be as high as .96
(Colom, Rebollo, Palacios, Juan-Espinosa,
Kyllonen, 2004)
12Executive Function (EF)
- capacities that enable a person to engage
successfully in independent, purposive,
self-serving behavior (Lezak) - Duncan- executive functions deficits (goal
neglect) are characteristic of individuals low on
g. - Not much research examining g, FR, EF
13(No Transcript)
14Study EFFR
- Purpose
- Examine dimensions
- N70, undergrads
- WCST
- Problem solving, feedback
- Category Test (Halstead-Reitan)
- Guess categories
- Trail Making A B
- Fluid Reasoning (WJ-R)
- Concept Formation, Analysis Synthesis, Spatial
Relations, Verbal Analogies
15Trails B
16Variables
- Executive functions
- WCST- total number errors
- Category-total errors in category
- Trails B- time (higher worse performance)
- Fluid Reasoning (WJ-R)
- Concept Formation-describe rule for group
inclusion - Analysis Synthesis-reasoning
- Analogies
- Prediction ( dimensions)
17Factor Analysis 1 factor
Total Variance Explained
Extraction Method Principal Component Analysis.
18(No Transcript)
19Figure 3.
Note WCSTP Wisconsin Card Sorting
Test-Perseveration CT Category Test TRIALSB
Trail Making Test B VBAN Verbal Analysis
SPRL Spatial Relations CNCPT Concept
Formation ANSN Analysis Synthesis.
20(No Transcript)
21Fit Statistics
22EF and Fluid Reasoning
- G, Gf, WM, EF all highly related
- Single factor or Two Factor correlations fit best
- Theories are needed to clarify this relationship
and merge psychometric theories with cognitive
theories (Miyake, Friedman, Rettinger, Shah,
Hegarty, 2001).
23Brain based research
- Frontal Lobes important for EF
- (Luria, 1973, 1980)
- EF deficits from non-frontal areas (Reitan
Wolfson, 1994) - Fluid Reasoning
- Left posterior activity on Ravens (Haier, White,
Alkire, 2003) - Dorsolateral and cingulate important (J. Duncan
Owen, 2000) - Ventromedial-emotional aspects of reasoning
(Damasio, 1994)
24Review
- All measures of cognitive ability have a common
variance, g. - Constructs of g, working memory, fluid reasoning,
and executive functions are highly related. - No consensus exists for defining any of the above
mentioned constructs. However, there is
overlapping characteristics of these different
constructs in definition and measurement. It is
assumed the shared definitions and measurement of
these constructs accounts for the empirical
association. - No consensus exists for defining the information
processing demands for the above constructs, but
of these constructs working memory is best
defined by information models followed by
executive functions. Activation of
representations that can be manipulated is core
to most models. - In general, tasks that are considered indicators
of the constructs listed above, are highly
related to the frontal lobes, specifically the
left dorsolateral, of the brain but also on the
interaction of the frontal lobes with other parts
of the brain, specifically a left posterior
region involved deemed important in guiding motor
plans and attention.
25Future Research
- Theoretical understanding of these constructs
will come from brain based research, informed by
evolutionary psychology
26Help from primate models of Frontal-Parietal
Interaction (Fuster Petrides)
27One other problem Content
- Theories must be related to adaptive problem
solving - Reasoning is influenced by information content
(Cosmides, 1989) - Evolutionary theories of social exchange and
cheater detection (Wason task) - Where does information content fit into
intelligence? Gc? - Unresolved
28Problem Solving
- Initiation of frontal lobes
- Frontal lobes defines problems and urgency
- Parietal lobes-stored perceptions creates model
(simulation vs. attention) or problem to guide
motor behavior - Frontal lobes evaluates/selects best simulation
29(No Transcript)
30(No Transcript)
31(No Transcript)
32(No Transcript)
33Dorso-frontal and poly-sensory associative
parietal cortex areas
34Re-defining intelligence
- Executive functions, working memory, fluid
intelligence, g, are highly related and represent
variations of intelligence - G is the degree to which a task involves
processes in model (selective attention,
dorsofrontal to parietal interaction,
evaluation). - Global scores are meaningless (Lezak)
- Mixture of many different constructs
- IQ tests dont measure intelligence (Ardilia)
- Cognitive-perceptual simulation rather than just
information processing
35Assessment
- Further devaluation of FSIQ
- More specific definition of intelligence
constructbetter measures - IRT models for item level analysis to relate
difficulty to brain regions - Justify EF type measures in IQ tests (may clarify
ability-ach discrep) - Reduce processing type tests in IQ estimation
- More open ended type questions to reduce
structure (Goldberg Damasio) - New directions in social-emotional assessment
36Assessment Outline
- Intelligence
- Top-down
- Fluid reasoning
- Working memory
- Executive functions
- Processing
- Bottom-up
- Primary Sensory
- Sensory
- Motor
- Auditory
- Visual
- Secondary Processing
- Motor (complex motor patterns)
- Auditory
- Visual
- Learning
- Rate
- Retention
37Clinical Applications
- Disorder linked to functional deficit
- Separating anterior disorders (EF) from posterior
disorders. - Goal neglect-knowing what to do but not doing it.
- Internally directed attention (CPT, Trails B)
- Working Memory span
- Conceptual manipulation
38Hierarchy of abilities Evolution of cognitive
abilities
- Stimulus-response (environment-motor)
- Associative Memory (stored representation)
- Self-initiated memory retrieval
- Cognitive simulation -goal-oriented active
manipulation of perceptual representations to
simulate behavioral alternatives (modeling
social motives?)
39Questions
- Contact info sdecker_at_gsu.edu