Executive Functions, g, Fluid Reasoning, and Working Memory - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 39
About This Presentation
Title:

Executive Functions, g, Fluid Reasoning, and Working Memory

Description:

IQ tests don't measure executive functions, thus don't measure intelligence ... IQ tests (may clarify ability-ach discrep) Reduce processing type tests in IQ ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:495
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: coea
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Executive Functions, g, Fluid Reasoning, and Working Memory


1
Executive Functions, g, Fluid Reasoning, and
Working Memory
  • Theory and Measurement

2
Brief Background
Georgia State University
3
Purpose
  • Collaborative research
  • Intelligence (g, Gf), Working Memory, Executive
    Functions are all related and constitute core
    functions in intelligence
  • IQ tests dont measure executive functions, thus
    dont measure intelligence
  • Theoretical speculation

4
Overview
  • School Psychology -overview
  • What is intelligence and higher cognitive
    abilities
  • 6,292,930 children in special ed.(Digest of
    Educational Statistics, 2002), many of which
    receive IQ tests
  • Intelligence Testing
  • Binet, Terman, Yerkes, Wechsler, Spearman,
    Cattell, etc.

5
History of Intelligence Theory
  • Intelligence as a single general ability
    (Spearman)
  • Intelligence as a pair of abilities
    (verbal-nonverbal)
  • Intelligence as a limited set of multiple
    abilities
  • Intelligence as a complete set of multiple
    abilities (Cattell-Horn)
  • Intelligence as a hierarchy of narrow abilities
    underlying multiple broad abilities (Carroll)

6
CHC Model
Wheres Executive Functions?
7
g
  • Empirically based
  • Represents the shared commonality of all measures
    of cognitive ability.
  • Difficult to interpret
  • Why are all tests of cognitive ability positively
    correlated?
  • Jensen
  • Most important construct in psychology
  • Nerve conduction velocity, based on RT studies

8
Interpreting g
  • g-loaded tests involve complex cognitive
    operations such as reasoning and abstraction that
    is based on the complexity of the mental
    operations rather than specific knowledge in a
    given area (Arend et al., 2002 Jensen, 1998
    Spilsbury, 1992).
  • Spearman
  • Intelligence is induction of relationships/correla
    tes, mental energy

9
G and fluid intelligence
  • Fluid reasoning
  • Highest/indistinguishable loading on g
  • inductive and deductive reasoning
  • Ravens Progressive Matrices developed to
    measure g, rooted in biology.

10
(No Transcript)
11
Information ProcessingWM and Fluid Reasoning
  • Reasoning ability and g is working memory
  • Kyllonen, (1996) Kyllonen, Christal, R. E.
    (1990)
  • Working memory and fluid reasoning are associated
    (Engle, Tuholski, Laughlin, Conway, 1999)
  • g on a working memory factor to be as high as .96
    (Colom, Rebollo, Palacios, Juan-Espinosa,
    Kyllonen, 2004)

12
Executive Function (EF)
  • capacities that enable a person to engage
    successfully in independent, purposive,
    self-serving behavior (Lezak)
  • Duncan- executive functions deficits (goal
    neglect) are characteristic of individuals low on
    g.
  • Not much research examining g, FR, EF

13
(No Transcript)
14
Study EFFR
  • Purpose
  • Examine dimensions
  • N70, undergrads
  • WCST
  • Problem solving, feedback
  • Category Test (Halstead-Reitan)
  • Guess categories
  • Trail Making A B
  • Fluid Reasoning (WJ-R)
  • Concept Formation, Analysis Synthesis, Spatial
    Relations, Verbal Analogies

15
Trails B
16
Variables
  • Executive functions
  • WCST- total number errors
  • Category-total errors in category
  • Trails B- time (higher worse performance)
  • Fluid Reasoning (WJ-R)
  • Concept Formation-describe rule for group
    inclusion
  • Analysis Synthesis-reasoning
  • Analogies
  • Prediction ( dimensions)

17
Factor Analysis 1 factor
Total Variance Explained
Extraction Method Principal Component Analysis.
18
(No Transcript)
19
Figure 3.
Note WCSTP Wisconsin Card Sorting
Test-Perseveration CT Category Test TRIALSB
Trail Making Test B VBAN Verbal Analysis
SPRL Spatial Relations CNCPT Concept
Formation ANSN Analysis Synthesis.
20
(No Transcript)
21
Fit Statistics
22
EF and Fluid Reasoning
  • G, Gf, WM, EF all highly related
  • Single factor or Two Factor correlations fit best
  • Theories are needed to clarify this relationship
    and merge psychometric theories with cognitive
    theories (Miyake, Friedman, Rettinger, Shah,
    Hegarty, 2001).

23
Brain based research
  • Frontal Lobes important for EF
  • (Luria, 1973, 1980)
  • EF deficits from non-frontal areas (Reitan
    Wolfson, 1994)
  • Fluid Reasoning
  • Left posterior activity on Ravens (Haier, White,
    Alkire, 2003)
  • Dorsolateral and cingulate important (J. Duncan
    Owen, 2000)
  • Ventromedial-emotional aspects of reasoning
    (Damasio, 1994)

24
Review
  • All measures of cognitive ability have a common
    variance, g.
  • Constructs of g, working memory, fluid reasoning,
    and executive functions are highly related.
  • No consensus exists for defining any of the above
    mentioned constructs. However, there is
    overlapping characteristics of these different
    constructs in definition and measurement. It is
    assumed the shared definitions and measurement of
    these constructs accounts for the empirical
    association.
  • No consensus exists for defining the information
    processing demands for the above constructs, but
    of these constructs working memory is best
    defined by information models followed by
    executive functions. Activation of
    representations that can be manipulated is core
    to most models.
  • In general, tasks that are considered indicators
    of the constructs listed above, are highly
    related to the frontal lobes, specifically the
    left dorsolateral, of the brain but also on the
    interaction of the frontal lobes with other parts
    of the brain, specifically a left posterior
    region involved deemed important in guiding motor
    plans and attention.

25
Future Research
  • Theoretical understanding of these constructs
    will come from brain based research, informed by
    evolutionary psychology

26
Help from primate models of Frontal-Parietal
Interaction (Fuster Petrides)
27
One other problem Content
  • Theories must be related to adaptive problem
    solving
  • Reasoning is influenced by information content
    (Cosmides, 1989)
  • Evolutionary theories of social exchange and
    cheater detection (Wason task)
  • Where does information content fit into
    intelligence? Gc?
  • Unresolved

28
Problem Solving
  • Initiation of frontal lobes
  • Frontal lobes defines problems and urgency
  • Parietal lobes-stored perceptions creates model
    (simulation vs. attention) or problem to guide
    motor behavior
  • Frontal lobes evaluates/selects best simulation

29
(No Transcript)
30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
(No Transcript)
33
Dorso-frontal and poly-sensory associative
parietal cortex areas
34
Re-defining intelligence
  • Executive functions, working memory, fluid
    intelligence, g, are highly related and represent
    variations of intelligence
  • G is the degree to which a task involves
    processes in model (selective attention,
    dorsofrontal to parietal interaction,
    evaluation).
  • Global scores are meaningless (Lezak)
  • Mixture of many different constructs
  • IQ tests dont measure intelligence (Ardilia)
  • Cognitive-perceptual simulation rather than just
    information processing

35
Assessment
  • Further devaluation of FSIQ
  • More specific definition of intelligence
    constructbetter measures
  • IRT models for item level analysis to relate
    difficulty to brain regions
  • Justify EF type measures in IQ tests (may clarify
    ability-ach discrep)
  • Reduce processing type tests in IQ estimation
  • More open ended type questions to reduce
    structure (Goldberg Damasio)
  • New directions in social-emotional assessment

36
Assessment Outline
  • Intelligence
  • Top-down
  • Fluid reasoning
  • Working memory
  • Executive functions
  • Processing
  • Bottom-up
  • Primary Sensory
  • Sensory
  • Motor
  • Auditory
  • Visual
  • Secondary Processing
  • Motor (complex motor patterns)
  • Auditory
  • Visual
  • Learning
  • Rate
  • Retention

37
Clinical Applications
  • Disorder linked to functional deficit
  • Separating anterior disorders (EF) from posterior
    disorders.
  • Goal neglect-knowing what to do but not doing it.
  • Internally directed attention (CPT, Trails B)
  • Working Memory span
  • Conceptual manipulation

38
Hierarchy of abilities Evolution of cognitive
abilities
  • Stimulus-response (environment-motor)
  • Associative Memory (stored representation)
  • Self-initiated memory retrieval
  • Cognitive simulation -goal-oriented active
    manipulation of perceptual representations to
    simulate behavioral alternatives (modeling
    social motives?)

39
Questions
  • Contact info sdecker_at_gsu.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com