Title: Pain Management in Terminal Illness
1Pain Management in Terminal Illness
2Effective pain management in terminally ill
requires
- Understanding of pain control strategies
- Ongoing assessment
- Diagnosis of pain
- Breakthrough pain relief
- Fine adjustment of medications
- Opioid rotation
- Unresolved psychosocial or spiritual issue can be
great impact to pain management -
3- Patient dying from nonmalignant disease suffer
similar level of pain to those found in patient
with malignant disease - People at particular risk for undertreatment
- Older adults
- Minorities
- Women
4Goals of Pain Management
- In cancer
- gt 80 will achieve good control
- 15 will have fair control
- lt 5 will have poor or no control
5Principle of pain control at end-of-life
- Pain can be mostly controlled by WHO step-care
approach - Acute or escalating pain is the medical emergency
that require prompt attention - Addiction is not the issue in patients with
terminal illness
6The WHO Analgesic Ladder
SEVERE PAIN
Morphine Fentanyl Methadone
MODERATE PAIN
Codeine Tramal
MILD PAIN
Aspirin Acetaminophen NSAIDs
Co-analgesics Drugs, nerve blocks, TENS,
relaxation, acupuncture
Specific therapies Radiotherapy,
chemotherapy,surgery
- Address psychosocial problems
7Multifactorial Nature of Cancer Pain
8Advanced Rectal cancer s/p palliative colostomy,
large pelvic mass involved bony structure,
incarcerated peri-anal erosion multiple lymph
node metastasis. fecal incontinence,
- Stocking like dysesthesia,
- Diminished pinprick sensation
- Slight motor weakness
9Pain problems has to be diagnosed and
differential diagnose
10BACK PAIN Differential diagnosis
- Local invasion of pancreatic cancer to parietal
peritoneum, celiac ganglion, - Visceral referred pain
- Metastasis bone pain
- Enlarged Aortic lymph node
- Concurrent degenerative bone disease
spondylosis, spondylolithiasis, spinal stenosis
11Available evidence for pain treatments
12Neuropathic VS Nociceptive pain
- Tissue damage
- Activation of peripheral nociceptive nerve
terminals - Impulse conduction and synaptic processing
- Pain
- Damage to the nervous system
- Loss of function
- Ectopic activity within the nociceptive system
- Impulse conduction and synaptic processing
- Pain
13Characteristic of cancer pain
PAIN
- Acute Pain
- Follows injury...resolves
- Objective physical signsCOMMON
- Chronic Pain--cancer, term. illness
- Objective signs RARE
- Patient may not look like he/she is in pain
Persistent Pain (Back ground)
Breakthrough Pain
14Characteristic of cancer pain
PAIN
- Nociceptive
- Somatic bone/soft tissue tender, deep,
aching - Visceral spasms, cramping, gnawing
- Neuropathic or Deafferentation
- shooting, stabbing, burning paresthesias,
hypesthesias, allodynia
Persistent Pain (Back ground)
Breakthrough Pain
15Abdominal Visceral Pain
16VISCERAL PAIN is different from SOMATIC PAIN
- Cutaneous
- Muscle
- Visceral
- Pricking
- Stabbing
- Burning
Poorly Localized
Inconsistent sensations, often inescapable,
sometimes referred
17Nociceptive pain
18Sqaumous cell CA of lips
Squamous cell CA of skin
19Pathological mechanisms of mixed pain state
Tissue/ organs
Nociceptive component Sprouting from C-Fibres
into the disc
C Fibre
Neuropathic component I Damage to a branch of
the C Fibre due to compression and inflammatory
mediators
Tumor growth
C Fibre
A Fibre
Neuropathic component II Compression of nerve
root
Neuropathic component III Damage to nerve root
by inflammatory mediators
Central sensitisation
Baron R, Binder A. 2004 Orthopade 2004 33
568-75.
20NEUROPATHIC PAIN2 types
- .Continuous dysesthesias
- continuous burning, electrical sensations or
other abnormal sensations. - Chronic lancinating or paroxysmal pain
- sharp, stabbing, shooting, knifelike pain,
- often with a sudden onset.
21Etiologies
COMMON
22Etiologies
23Physiological Responses to Repetitive
Nociceptive Input
- Windup
- highly augmented response to repetitive
afferent (C-fiber) input - Neuronal plasticity
- changes in the CNS in response to repetitive
afferent nociceptive input
Herrero JF et al. Wind-up of spinal cord neurons
and pain sensation much ado about something?
Prog Neurobiol. 2000611690203. Mao J, Mayer
DJ. Spinal cord neuroplasticity following
repeated opioid exposure and its relation to
pathological pain. Ann N Y Acad Sci.
2001933175-84.
24Signs and Symptoms of Chemotherapy-induced
Peripheral Neuropathy
Adapted from Paice, Visovsky, and Quasthoff and
Hartung
25Metastasis to Bone are Common
- Most Common form of cancer related pain (75)
- 100,000 Cancer pts. / yr
- Poor prognostic factor
- Correlates with anxiety, depression morbidity
- Poor control of breakthrough aspect of cancer
bone pain with current pharmacological treatments
26Causes of pain due to bone metastases
- Activation of nociceptors by tumor
- Sensitization of peripheral nerves spinal
cord - Inflammation
- Nerve damage
- Pathological fractures
- Spinal cord compression
27Peripheral Mechanisms
- Tumor cell releases chemical mediators of pain
- Immune cells do likewise
- PH lowered
- Osteoclast activation
- Stretch of bone
- Denervation
- Destruction of fibres
28Cancer Induces sensory changes
- Dorsal horn neurons are hyper excitable in CIBP
- Emergence of behavioral hyperalgesia and
allodynia parallels altered neuronal response
PERIPHERAL ALTERATIONS DRIVE CENTRAL
HYPEREXCITABILITY
29Phantom pain vs Phantom sensation
30Types of pain due to bone metastases
- tonic background pain
- incident pain on movement
- spontaneous pain
31Breakthrough Pain Aspects and Subtypes
Idiopathic Stimulus Independent
32Incident Pain
- Pain occurring as a direct and immediate
consequence of a movement or certain activity,
rolling over in bed, riding in a car or being
bathed.
33(No Transcript)
34(No Transcript)
35(No Transcript)
36INCIDENT PAIN
- Management
- giving breakthrough dose of IR medication 30
minutes before activity - Premedication can reduce amount of pain that
occurs during activity. - Assess patients for underlying causes of the pain
- Correct causes if possible.
37- most challenging of cancer pains to control and
highly debilitating to the patients functional
status and QOL .2,3,4
38Barriers to Managing Incident Pain
- Common opioids outlast painful stimulus
- Opioid dose for incident pain may far exceed
that needed for background pain control - May be little warning of incident
- Effective premedication before activity is time
consuming -
39Assessing pain at the end of life
- The primary source of information in a pain
assessment ? patient self-report - In cognitive impairment patient ,self-assessments
remain the cornerstone of pain management
40Pain Problem should be assessed
- Impeccable Pain Assessment
41Symptoms management
- Pain
- Even when the patient is close to death careful
evaluation and assessment of pain including a
history and examination where possible is still
necessary - It is important to exclude psychosocial issues
which may cause exacerbations - pain will not be troublesome at the very end if
control has previously been good.
42A comprehensive evaluation of pain
- Intensity
- Character
- Frequency
- Onset
- Duration
- Location
- History of pain
- Physical and neurologic examination
- Psychosocial assessment
43- Way of expressing other forms of suffering
- Distress
- Grieving
- Anxiety
- depression
Psychosocial spiritual evaluation and
intervention will be more effective than
analgesics
44Listen with empathy to patients perception of
their pain
Explain your perception of pain problems
Ackowledge differences and similarities in
perceptions
Recommend treatment Negotiate agreement
45Diagnostic evaluation
- Test to determine the cause of pain
- Corroborate clinical impression of the cause of
pain and mechanisms - Neither delay empiric treatment nor add excessive
burden to the patient
46Differentiating pain mechanisms at end of life
- Terminal stage ? multiple mechanism of pain
- Type of treatment and its success is largely
dictated by the pain mechanism and its original
source
47PAIN ASSESSMENT
- Extent of nociception / disease / impairment
- Magnitude of the suffering / quality of life
- Pain behaviours / psychological / social patterns
48The Process of Diagnosis
- Medical History
- Symptom assessment
- Verbal descriptors
- Pain scales
- Physical examination using simple bedside / in
office instrumentation - Diagnostic tests
EMG electromyography, NCS nerve conduction
studies
49Pain Assessment
- Listen carefully What are the words used?
- May deny pain but will admit to having
discomfort, aching or soreness - Do you hurt anywhere?
- Are you uncomfortable?
- How does it affect you?
- Believe the patient pain is what the patient
says hurts.the best judge of a patients pain is
the patient Bonica - Assess for other symptoms Portenoy Study of 243
cancer patients- Average of 11.5 symptoms
50Pain Assessment Tools
- OLD CARTS
- O Onset acute vs gradual
- L Location ( radiation)
- D Duration (recent/chronic)
- C Characteristics (quality of pain)
- A Aggravating factors
- R Relieving factors
- T Treatments previously tried - response
- - dose/duration
- - why discontinued?
- S Severity Pain Scales 0- 10 VAS
51Assess the Person, Not just the pain
52Please rate your pain by
circling the one number that best describes your
pain _____________________________________________
________________ 0 1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 What is your Pain at its
Best / Worst/ Present/ Average0 1
2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 No Pain
Pain as bad as
you can imagine
In the past 24 hours, how much RELIEF have
pain treatments or medications provided? Please
circle the one percentage that most shows how
much. ____________________________________________
_________________ 0 10 20 30
40 50 60 70 80 90 100
53(No Transcript)
54Patient with advanced cancer is in dynamic state
Careful and Frequent Assessment is the key
55Take Home message
56Drug for pain relief in palliative care
- Principle of effective symptom control
- Diagnose the underlying cause of each symptom and
tailor the treatment to individual circumstances
and clinical context - Influence factors for drug response
- Genetic factors
- Pathologic processes
- Concurrent medication
- aging
57- Determine the etiology of pain and the social and
prognostic circumstances that will affect the
pain experience and pain therapy - Focus on discernible clinical end point
- Pain reduction
- Functional capacity
- Mood
- Sleep
- Relationships
- Pleasure in living
58- Match the mechanism of pain with the class of
drug - Initiate therapy and adjust dose according to
therapeutic response, side effect, and known
pharmacokinetics of the drug - Anticipate and monitor for adverse effect
- Prevent side effect
- Actively treat side effects
59Pain Treatment Methods
Remove Causes
Psychological Methods
Medications
Regional Anesthesia
Physical Methods
Surgery Splinting Etc.
Non-opioids
Opioids
Nerve block Epidural block Catheterization Interve
ntional
TNS Acupuncture Physio Ice, US
Relaxation Manipulation Hypnosis
60To cure sometimes.To relief often.But to
comfort always.
61Management Considerations
- age-specific considerations
- Morphine often drug of choicenon-ceiling. Other
nonceiling drugs include hydromorphone,
levorphanol and methadone - Use non-narcotic when able
- Combinations may work by different mechanisms
thus greater efficacy (e.g. Tylenol w/codeine)
62Normal pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics may
be considerably altered by end-stage disease
states
63If the patient cannot swallow ?
- ROUTES
- SUBCUTANEOUS
- Continuous (Syringe driver)
- Intermittent (scalp vein needle)
- INTRAVENOUS
- RECTAL
- TRANSDERMAL PATCH
- EPIDURAL/INTRATHECAL
64Indications for Parenteral Opioids
- Inability to swallow
- Rapidly escalating pain
- Intractable adverse effects such as nausea with
oral opioids - Cognitive dysfunction
- Compliance problems
- Bowel obstruction
- Severe stomatitis
- Large doses of opioids with many tablets to
swallow
65- Parenteral administration
- Intravenous route
- Rapid drug delivery
- Required vascular access
- Not be easily obtained or maintained in the home
or long-term care setting - Subcutaneous bolus
- Effective
- Slower onset ,lower peak effect
- Subcutaneous infusion
- As much as 10 ml/hr are usually absorbed
- Most patient tolerate 2-3 ml/hr with least
difficulty
66(No Transcript)
67Routes of administration
68Routes of administration (cont.)
69If the patient cannot swallow ?
- ROUTES
- SUBCUTANEOUS
- Continuous (Syringe driver)
- Intermittent (scalp vein needle)
- INTRAVENOUS
- RECTAL
- TRANSDERMAL PATCH
- EPIDURAL/INTRATHECAL
70If the patient cannot swallow ?
- CONVERSION
- Subcutaneous / IV ½ oral 24 hr dose.
- Rectal oral dose
- Transdermal patch 25 ug/ hr
- 60mg oral/24 hr
- 30mg subcut/24 hr
- Epidural 1/10 subcut/iv
- Intrathecal 1/100 subcut/iv
71Intraspinal route
- Epidural or intrathecal
- Equipment complex, required specialized knowledge
for health care professionals - Risk of infection
- Maintenance costs
72If the patient cannot swallow ?
- CONVERSION
- Subcutaneous / IV ½ oral 24 hr dose.
- Rectal oral dose
- Transdermal patch 25 ug/ hr
- 60mg oral/24 hr
- 30mg subcut/24 hr
- Epidural 1/10 subcut/iv
- Intrathecal 1/100 subcut/iv
73Opioids and route of administration
74Subcutaneous infusion of analgesic drugs
- Pain that may benefit
- Postoperative or other form of acute pain
- Patients with HIV/ AIDS
- Oncology and palliative care
- Chronic non-malignant pain
- Indications
- Unable to swallow oral medication
- Nil by mouth and previous taking oral morphine
- Unable to take oral morphine because intractable
nausea and vomiting - Unconscious paliative care patients who has been
taking oral opioid
75(No Transcript)
76Intrathecal Drug Delivery System For Chronic Pain
77- 2. Cancer Pain
- The principal indication is failure of
conventional routes of administration of
analgesics to achieve satisfactory analgesia
despite escalating doses of strong opioids,
and/or dose limiting side effects . - The malignancy must be fully investigated with
appropriate imaging techniques prior to a
decision to undertake ITDD.
78 Patient selection
- Patient selection is extremely important and
should comprise a comprehensive
multidisciplinary assessment - Clinical symptoms and disease,
- Psychological- comprehensive psychological
assessment - i) assess possible concurrent
psychopathology (e.g. severe affective disorder ,
body dysmorphia, procedural fears) that might
impede successful implantation - ii) to consider what additional
individualised preparation might be advisable for
the patient. - Social
79A
K
N
T
H