Title: AAP Things That Work: Prevention of Catheter Related Bloodstream Infections
1AAP Things That WorkPrevention of Catheter
Related Bloodstream Infections
- Marlene R. Miller, M.D., M.Sc.
- Christopher T. McKee, DO
- Ivor Berkowitz, M.D.
- Claire Beers, R.N., M.S.N.
- Johns Hopkins Childrens Center
- Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Control
- Center for Innovations in Quality Patient Care
2Introduction
- Review Epidemiology
- Define Standard of Care
- Hand Hygiene
- Maximal Barrier Precautions
- Proper Antisepsis
- Insertion Sites of Choice
- Describe our intervention and results to date
3The Problem
- 250,000 cases of central venous catheter related
bloodstream infections (CR-BSI) per year in US - 80,000 cases per year in ICUs
- Attributable mortality 12-25
- Attributable cost 25,000 per episode
4(No Transcript)
5Strategies For Prevention Adult Experience
- Hand Hygiene
- Use of Maximal Barrier Precautions
- Chlorhexidine for Skin Antisepsis
- Subclavian Site as First Choice
- Remove Unnecessary Lines
MMWR. 200251RR-10
6What Is Pediatric Best Practice?
- No studies published in pediatric literature
- Assume adult data holds for children
- Exception is optimal site of line insertion
7BSI Intervention
- Education on best practices
- Line cart
- Nursing check list for CL insertion
- Empowerment of nurses to stop procedures if best
practices breached
8Hand Hygiene The Data
-
- Since 1977, 7 of 8 prospective studies have
shown that improvement in hand hygiene
significantly decreases infection rates -
Clin Infect Dis 1999291287-94
9Alcohol-Based Hand Cleansers
Non-medicated soap used alcohol was mixture of
n-propanol and isopropanol hands contaminated
under clinical conditions Am J Infect
Control 1999 27258-61
10Hand Hygiene Be A Role Model
- HCWs in a room with a senior medical staff person
or peer who did not wash their hands were
significantly less likely to wash their own hands
(OR 0.2, p - Use of gloves does not obviate the need for hand
hygiene
Emerg Infect Dis 2003 9217-23
11Hand Hygiene Best Practice
- Purell for routine hand cleaning
- Soap and water when hands are soiled and at start
of day - One of these types of cleanings should be done
before inserting a central line
12Maximal Barrier Precautions
13Do I Really Need Maximal Barrier Precautions ?
Am J Med 199191(3B)197S-205S Infect Control
Hosp Epidemiol 199415231-8
14What Are Maximal Barrier Precautions?
- For You
- Hand hygiene
- Non-sterile cap and mask
- All hair should be under cap
- Mask should cover nose and mouth tightly
- Sterile gown and gloves
- For the Patient
- Cover patients head and body with a large
sterile drape
15Who Needs To Be Dressed In MBP?
- The operator
- The assistant
- Anyone else who crosses the sterile field
- NOT people in the same room who are not involved
with the procedure
16Skin Prep
- Chlorhexidine 2 is more effective than povidone
iodine (Betadine) because it dries quickly and
has longer residual action
17Skin Prep
- If you must use Betadine
- Allow Betadine to dry completely (at least 2
minutes) - Do not blow on, fan, or blot the site to make it
dry faster!
18Dressing The Line
- Apply dressing immediately after placement when
site is still sterile - Use transparent dressing (Sorbaview) unless site
is oozing or pt is allergic
19Maintaining The Line
- Change transparent dressing weekly, gauze
dressing daily, and any dressing that is damp,
bloody, or non-occlusive - Do not use topical ointment or cream at insertion
site - Do not leave a line undressed
- Lines examined daily by medical staff
20What Site Is Best?
- No randomized trial satisfactorily has compared
infection rates for catheters placed in jugular,
subclavian, and femoral sites. MMWR, 8/9/02
21What Site Is Best?
- The Hopkins Experienceretrospective analysis of
SICU IJ SC catheters that grew ? 15 cfu - IJ position was the only predictive factor of ?
15 cfu (OR 1.83, p
22What Site Is Best?
- RCT of femoral and SC lines in the ICU
- 145 pts femoral/144 pts SC
- Outcomes
- Similar rates of mechanical complication 17.3
vs 18.8 (p NS) - Higher rate of infectious complications
(colonization and BSI combined) in femoral grp
19.8 vs 4.5 (p - Higher rate of thrombotic complications in
femoral grp 21.5 vs. 1.9 (p
thrombosis 6 vs 0
JAMA 2001,286700-7
23What Site Is Best?
- Based on these and other studies, the JHH VAD
policy recommends that the preferred order of
line placement is - SC ?IJ ?F
- Other factors to consider in site choice
- Anatomic deformity
- Coagulopathy
- Operator experience
24What Site Is Best For Children?
- Traditionally femoral vein is site of first
choice for all pediatric patients - Operator experience is determining factor for
placement of lines elsewhere - Infectious data does not hold true in children
- Site of insertion does not correlate with
infectious complications - Same or fewer mechanical complications noted with
femoral line placement - No thrombotic risk with femoral line placement
25Summary of Best Practices
- Wash your hands or use waterless hand cleaners
- Use sterile technique and maximal barrier
precautions when placing central lines - Use chlorhexidine for line insertion and
dressing changes - Use femoral site if possible
- Dont put in lines that are not needed and take
out lines that are not needed
26BSI Intervention
- Education on best practices
- Line cart
- Nursing check list for CL insertion
- Empowerment of nurses to stop procedures if best
practices breeched
27(No Transcript)
28BSI effort starts
29BSI Intervention
- Education on best practices
- Hand Hygiene
- Use of Maximal Barrier Precautions
- Chlorhexidine for Skin Antisepsis
- Femoral Site as First Choice
- Remove Unnecessary Lines
- Line cart
- Nursing check list for CL insertion
- Empowerment of nurses to stop procedures if best
practices breeched
30Lessons Learned
- Actual and reported practices vary
- People may not know what you think they know
- Team work helps
- Maximized preparation helps (line cart)
- Need to be on alert for next best thing in new
equipment