The Influence of Fire on Small Mammals - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

The Influence of Fire on Small Mammals

Description:

Tassel-eared squirrel (Patton et al. 1985, Elson 1999) Photo: www. ... Tassel-eared squirrel foraging patterns and projected effects of ecological restoration ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:60
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: chr1321
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Influence of Fire on Small Mammals


1
The Influence of Fire on Small Mammals
Christopher M. McGlone FOR 551
2
  • Relevance of fire for small mammals
  • Most small mammals have limited
  • long-range mobility
  • Difficult to escape fire
  • Burrowing most effective means
  • Often more dependent on
  • condition of immediate
  • environment

3
  • Fire has most important impacts on
  • small mammals via
  • Nest quality and availability
  • Reduction in shelter from predation
  • Quality and availability of forage

4
  • Influence on nesting habitat
  • Direct mortality
  • Consumption of nesting habitat
  • Least important for belowground
  • nesters

5
  • Direct mortality
  • Greatest impact is on ground
  • nesters (no protection from fire)
  • Rabbits
  • Harvest Mice
  • Woodrats
  • (Quinn 1979, Kaufman et al. 1988,
  • Simons 1991)

6
  • Consumption of nesting habitat
  • Particularly important for small
  • mammals that use dead woody
  • material for nesting
  • Deer mice
  • Mexican voles
  • Porcupines
  • Animals will abandon an area that
  • no longer has suitable nesting
  • habitat
  • (Lyon et al. 2000, Chambers and Germaine 2003)

7
  • Burrowing mammals
  • Very effective method of fire
  • avoidance
  • Mexican voles
  • Kangaroo rats
  • Burrows usually deep enough to
  • avoid fatal heat
  • Inadequate ventilation can be a
  • serious threat to burrowing
  • mammals
  • (Quinn 1979, Hedlund and Rickard 1981, Geluso et
    al. 1986)
  • Photo www.animals.timduru.org

8
  • Influence on shelter availability
  • Consumption of ground-level
  • material
  • Removal of canopy

9
  • Consumption of ground-level shelter
  • Many small mammals use downed
  • woody debris as shelter while
  • foraging
  • Ground squirrel
  • Mexican woodrat
  • Mexican voles
  • (Chambers and Germaine 2003)

10
  • Loss of canopy
  • Heavily burned areas often see an
  • increase in predator abundance
  • Loss of proper shelter will also
  • cause animals to abandon an area
  • (Tewes 1984, Vacanti and Geluso 1985, Groves and
    Steenhof 1988)

11
  • Changes in forage availability
  • Fire can alter understory vegetation
  • Transition from late to
  • early successional
  • Fire can alter trees
  • Tree mortality
  • Increase in live tree vigor

12
  • Changes in understory vegetation
  • Can be either positive or negative
  • Tends to favor generalists
  • Deer mice
  • Tends to be detrimental to specialists
  • Pinyon mice
  • (Ahlgren 1966, Heinein et al. 1998
  • Lyon et al. 2000)

13
  • Changes in tree availability
  • Tree mortality results in reduced
  • forage availability
  • Reduction in competition can result
  • in increased growth and seed
  • production
  • Tassel-eared squirrel
  • (Patton et al. 1985, Elson 1999)
  • Photo www.bbc.uk.com

14
Literature Cited Ahlgren, CE. 1966. Small
mammals and reforestation following prescribed
burning. Journal of Forestry. 64614-618. Chambe
rs, CL and Germaine, SS. 2003. Verebrates. in
Ecological Restoration of Southwestern
Ponderosa Pine Forests. Friederici, P ed.
Island Press. Washington, USA. Elson, MT. 1999.
Tassel-eared squirrel foraging patterns and
projected effects of ecological
restoration treatments at Mt. Trumbull, Arizona.
MS Thesis. Northern Arizona University. Geluso,
KN, Schroder, GD, and Bragg, TB. 1986.
Fire-avoidance behavior of meadow voles
(Microtus pennsylvanicus). American Midland
Naturalist. Groves, CR and Steenhof, K. 1988.
Responses of small mammals and vegetation to
wildfire in shadscale communities of
southwestern Idaho. Northwest Science.
62205-210. Hedlund, JD and Rickard, WH. 1981.
Wildfire and the short-term response small
mammals inhabiting a sagebrush-bunchgrass
community. Murrelet. 6210-14. Heiein, K,
Wegner, J, and Merrian, G. 1998. Population
effects of landscape model manipulations on
two behaviorally different woodland small
mammals. Oikos. 81168-186. Kaufman, GA,
Kaufman, DW, and Finck, EJ. 1988. The effect of
fire and topography on habitat selection by
Peromyscuc maniculatus and Reithrodontomys
megalotis in ungrazed tallgrass prairie. Journal
of Mammology. 69342-352. Lyon, LJ, Huff, MH,
Telfer, ES, Schreiner, DS, and Smith, JK. 2000.
Fire effects on animal populations. Pp. 25-34.
in Wildland Fire in Ecosystems Effects of Fire
on Fauna. JK Smith ed. U.S. Forest Service
General Technical Report RMRS-42. Patton, DR.
1977. Managing southwestern ponderosa pine for
the Abert squirrel. Journal of
Forestry. 75264-267. Quinn, RD. 1979. Effects
of fire on small mammals in the chaparral.
Cal-Nevada Wildlife Transactions. 1979125-133. S
imons, LH. 1991. Rodent dynamics in relation to
fire in the Sonoran Desert. Journal of
Mammology. 72 518-524. Tewes, ME. 1984.
Opportunistic feeding by white-tailed hawks at
prescribed burns. Wilson Bulletin. 96135-136. V
acanti, PL and Geluso, KN. 1985. Recolonization
of a burned prairie by meadow voles
(Microtus pennsylvanicus). Prairie Naturalist.
1715-22.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com