Classification of natural assets: implication of the update of the 1993 SNA and possible issues to address - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Classification of natural assets: implication of the update of the 1993 SNA and possible issues to address

Description:

Should the SNA mention that natural resources can be classified twice (according ... Mentioning in the SNA the category ecosystems, although not in the classification? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: juergensc
Learn more at: https://unstats.un.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Classification of natural assets: implication of the update of the 1993 SNA and possible issues to address


1
Classification of natural assets implication of
the update of the 1993 SNA and possible issues to
address
  • Alessandra Alfieri and Ivo Havinga
  • London Group
  • (New York, 19 - 21 June 2006)

2
Overview
  • Background
  • Definition of assets in 1993 SNA and SEEA
  • Changes in the 1993 SNA Rev.1 asset
    classification and impacts in the SEEA-2003
  • Proposal for aligning the classification of
    natural resources in the 1993 SNA Rev.1 with
    SEEA-2003
  • Terminology issues
  • Presentation issues

3
Background
  • 1993 SNA update considered the issue of
    classification of assets
  • AEG recommended that 1993 SNA and SEEA-2003 be
    aligned, in particular for classification of
    natural resources
  • Requested the editor and UNSD to do it

4
Main changes in the 1993 SNA Rev.1 asset
classification
  • Replace tangible non-produced assets with
    natural resources
  • Replace intangible non-produced asset and split
    it in contracts, leases and licenses and
    goodwill and marketing assets
  • Record Land improvements as GFCF of buildings
    and structures and not under land
  • Align terminology of natural resources with
    SEEA-2003

5
Differences in terminology between 1993 SNA Rev.1
and SEEA-2003
  • Natural resources
  • SNA includes including land
  • SEEA both cultivated assets and tangible
    non-produced assets, no land identified
    separately

6
Differences Mineral and energy
  • Terminology
  • SNA Subsoil,
  • SEEA Mineral and energy
  • SNA Coal, oil, mineral gas
  • SEEA Fossil fuels
  • Definition of reserves
  • Suggest to expand asset boundary to probable and
    possible?
  • Expansion of asset boundary to non-renewable
    resources?

7
Non-cultivated biological resources
  • Terminology
  • SNA Natural forests
  • SEEA Timber
  • SNA Wild stocks of fish and aquatic mammals
  • SEEA Aquatic resources
  • Conceptual
  • Fish stocks outside the EEZ
  • High seas, if country has access rights

8
Water resources
  • SNA Rev.1 Expansion of asset boundary
  • Terminology
  • SNA Aquifers , Other
  • SEEA Surface water, Ground water

9
Other natural resources
  • Terminology
  • SNA Radio spectra other resources
  • SEEA Atmospheric ecosystem
  • Ecosystems
  • Should the SNA mention that natural resources can
    be classified twice (according to whether they
    provide goods natural resources or services
    ecosystems)?

10
Differences in presentation
  • Order in presentation of natural resources
  • SNA land, subsoil, non-cultivated biological
    resources, water, other
  • SEEA Mineral and energy, soil, water, biological
    resources, LAND (separate from natural
    resources), Ecosystems

11
Differences in presentation (2)
  • Grouping of produced and non-produced assets
  • The SEEA-2003 does not make explicit the
    distinction between
  • fixed asset and inventory

12
Why differences in presentation?
  • Perspective
  • SNA groups the items according to how to value
    them
  • SEEA groups them according to the resource
  • Should SNA and SEEA have the same presentation
    in the asset classification?

13
Questions to the LG?
  • Do you agree with
  • Would you like to see an Annex in the SNA
    explaining the difference between SNA and SEEA
    asset classification?
  • Dropping the item recreational land from both
    the SNA and SEEA?
  • Mentioning in the SNA the category ecosystems,
    although not in the classification?

14
Questions to the LG? (2)
  • Should the SEEA align its classification with the
    SNA?
  • In terms of order (land, mineral and energy, etc.
    or mineral and energy, land, etc.)?
  • In terms of grouping (by produced, non-produced,
    or by type of resource)?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com