SOURCE: Europeans attitudes towards animal cloning' Flash Eurobarometer Series - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

SOURCE: Europeans attitudes towards animal cloning' Flash Eurobarometer Series

Description:

SOURCE: Europeans attitudes towards animal cloning' Flash Eurobarometer Series – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:70
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 49
Provided by: barbara139
Learn more at: http://ucbiotech.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: SOURCE: Europeans attitudes towards animal cloning' Flash Eurobarometer Series


1
SOURCE Europeans attitudes towards animal
cloning. Flash Eurobarometer Series 238,
Conducted by The Gallup Organization, Hungary
upon the request of Directorate General Health
and Consumers, October 2008.
2
SOURCE Europeans attitudes towards animal
cloning. Flash Eurobarometer Series 238,
Conducted by The Gallup Organization, Hungary
upon the request of Directorate General Health
and Consumers, October 2008.
3
SOURCE Europeans attitudes towards animal
cloning. Flash Eurobarometer Series 238,
Conducted by The Gallup Organization, Hungary
upon the request of Directorate General Health
and Consumers, October 2008.
4
Britain ahead of most of Europe on GMOs
Use of GMOs
25 IN FAVOR
49 OPPOSED
  • The British public looks slightly favorably on
    GMOs with 49 opposed 25 in favor, according to
    a Eurobarometer survey.
  • Only five countries showed less opposition to
    GMOs, e.g., Ireland and Spain. 75 of opposition
    was in four member states, topped by Slovenia
    (82).
  • Attitudes towards GMOs are softening. Just 20 of
    Europeans say they are worried about them,
    compared with 24 in 2004 80 are not concerned
    about their use in farming.

SOURCE Eurobarometer Survey, 2008 http//www.che
ckbiotech.org/green_News_Genetics.aspx?infoId1732
2
5
Thinking about your diet over the past few
months, are there any foods or ingredients that
you have avoided or eaten less of?
Jan. Apr. July July
  • 2001 2003 2006 2008
  • Yes 54 53 59 56
  • No 46 46 40 44
  • Dont Know/Refused -- 1 1 --

IFIC
6
What food or ingredients did youavoid or eat
less of?
Jan. April July July
  • 2001 2003 2006 2008
  • Sugars 31 65 50 51
  • Fats/cholesterol 41 39 33 36
  • Animal products 28 35 28 20
  • Other 9 9 11 13
  • Snacks/Fast food -- 9 16 12
  • Salt/spices 11 8 12 15
  • Caffeine 4 4 N/A N/A
  • Soda 4 3 N/A N/A
  • Genetically engineered -- -- -- --

IFIC
7
Can you think of any information that is not
currently included on food labels that you would
like to see on food labels? And what types of
information would that be?
Jan. Apr. July July
  • 2001 2003 2006 2008
  • Yes 26 17 18 14
  • Ingredients (ie fats, salt) 6 4 3 --
  • Other 11 9 5 --
  • Genetically altered 2 2 1 lt1
  • No 74 77 82 86
  • Dont know/refused -- 6 -- --

IFIC
8
What, if anything are you concerned about when it
comes to food safety?
Jan. Apr. July July
  • 2001 2003 2006 2008
  • Packaging 27 15 15 3
  • Food Handling/Preparation 23 41 35 29
  • Other 19 9 4 2
  • Disease/Contamination 16 28 36 50
  • Chemicals/Pesticides in Food 10 7 16 6
  • Altered/Engineered Food 2 1 3 1
  • Nothing 9 5 -- --

IFIC
9
Are there any foods produced through
biotechnology in the supermarket today?
Jan. July July July
  • 1997 2001 2006 2007 2008
  • Yes 40 36 36 23 23
  • No 37 44 30 9 10
  • Dont Know/Refused 23 20 34 68 66

IFIC
10
Likelihood of purchase if modified by
biotechnology to taste better or fresher
Jan.
July July
  • 1997 2001 2006 2008
  • Total Likely 55 58 63 67
  • Very Likely 19 19 17 18
  • Somewhat Likely 36 39 46 49
  • Total Not Likely 43 38 37 34
  • Not Too Likely 21 19 30 25
  • Not At All Likely 22 19 7 9
  • Dont Know/Refused 2 4 -- --

IFIC
11
How confident are you about the safety of the US
food supply? Would you say?
July July
2006 2008 Very confident 21 18 Somewhat
confident 51 50 Neither confident nor not
confident 18 20 Not very confident 9 10 Not
at all confident 0 3
IFIC
12
How likely would you be to buy a variety of
produce if it was modified by biotechnology to
be protected from insect damage and required
fewer pesticides
Sept. Apr. July July
  • 1997 2001 2003 2006 2008
  • Total Likely 77 65 69 75 78
  • Very Likely 39 25 28 27 27
  • Somewhat Likely 38 40 41 48 51
  • Total Not Likely 23 30 28 26 22
  • Not Too Likely 11 15 14 19 15
  • Not At All Likely 12 15 14 7 7
  • Dont Know/Refused 1 5 3 -- --

IFIC
13
How likely would you be to buy a food product,
made with oils that had been modified by
biotechnology to
  • Reduce saturated Avoid Provide
  • fat content trans fats healthful fats
  • Total Likely 77 75 78
  • Very Likely 39 27 27
  • Somewhat Likely 38 48 51
  • Total Not Likely 23 26 22
  • Not Too Likely 11 19 15
  • Not At All Likely 12 7 7
  • Dont Know/Refused 1 -- --

IFIC
July 2008
14
Support for FDA Labeling Policy
Sept. April July July
  • 1997 2001 2003 2006 2008
  • Total Support 78 57 62 64 60
  • Strongly Support 45 35 37 40 33
  • Somewhat Support 33 22 26 24 27
  • Total Oppose 20 27 24 12 13
  • Somewhat oppose 9 13 10 8 8
  • Strongly oppose 11 14 14 4 5
  • Dont know/refused 1 8 8 24 27

IFIC
15
During the past few months, have you taken any
action or done anything because of any concerns
you may have about foods produced using
biotechnology?
Jan. Apr. July July
  • 2001 2003 2006 2008
  • Yes 5 4 2 7
  • No 95 95 97 93
  • Dont Know/Refused -- 1 1 --

IFIC
16
How much have you read or heard about using
biotechnology to produce medicines from special
varieties of corn and other crops? Would you say
you have heard...
Aug. April July July
  • 2002 2003 2006 2008
  • Total Read or Heard 48 49 41 45
  • A Lot 3 5 3 4
  • Some 17 15 14 15
  • A Little 28 29 24 27
  • Nothing At All 52 50 59 54

IFIC
17
Genomics is a form of animal biotechnology that
uses knowledge about the genetic makeup of
animals to aid in conventional breeding and
selection. Would you say your overall impression
of animal genomics is
Jan. Mar. July July
  • 2004 2005 2006 2008
  • Total Favorable 55 53 37 40
  • Very Favorable 17 17 16 12
  • Somewhat Favorable 38 36 21 28
  • Total Not Favorable 23 27 24 17
  • Not Very Favorable 9 9 15 10
  • Not at all Favorable 14 18 9 7
  • Neither Favorable, 15 15 39 41
  • nor Unfavorable

IFIC
18
Cloning is a form of animal biotechnology that
retains desirable traits by producing an animal
that is an identical twin. Would you say your
overall impression of animal cloning is...?
Jan. Mar. July July
  • 2004 2005 2006 2008
  • Total Favorable 18 15 16 23
  • Very Favorable 4 4 6 8
  • Somewhat Favorable 14 11 10 15
  • Total Not Favorable 71 74 56 45
  • Not Very Favorable 15 16 23 18
  • Not at all Favorable 56 58 33 27
  • Neither Favorable, 9 7 28 33
  • nor Unfavorable

IFIC
19
In some cases, animals that have been produced
through cloning are only used for breeding. Would
you say yourimpression of this form of animal
biotechnology is?
July July
  • 2006 2008
  • Total Favorable 18 23
  • Very Favorable 5 8
  • Somewhat Favorable 13 20
  • Total Not Favorable 46 40
  • Not Very Favorable 18 17
  • Not at all Favorable 28 23
  • Neither Favorable, 36 33
  • nor Unfavorable

IFIC
20
What is your overall impression of using
biotechnology to produce medicines from food
crops such as corn and rice? Would you say?
July July
  • 2006 2008
  • Total Favorable 42 23
  • Very Favorable 17 8
  • Somewhat Favorable 25 15
  • Total Not Favorable 6 45
  • Not Very Favorable 4 18
  • Not at all Favorable 2 27
  • Neither Favorable, 27 25
  • nor Unfavorable
  • Dont know enough 25 25
  • to form opinion

IFIC
21
If the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
determined that meat, milk, and eggs from animals
enhanced through genetic engineering were safe,
how likely would you be to buy them? Would you
say...?
Jan. Mar. July July
  • 2004 2005 2006 2008
  • Total Likely 59 53 57 65
  • Very Likely 20 21 12 17
  • Somewhat Likely 39 32 45 48
  • Total Not Likely 38 45 42 35
  • Not Too Likely 18 20 22 23
  • Not at all Likely 20 25 20 12

IFIC
22
And if the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) determined that meat, milk, and eggs from
cloned animals were safe, how likely would you be
to buy them? Would you say...?
Jan. Mar. July July
  • 2004 2005 2006 2008
  • Total Likely 34 34 42 48
  • Very Likely 12 12 9 13
  • Somewhat Likely 22 22 33 35
  • Total Not Likely 62 63 58 52
  • Not Too Likely 19 20 28 26
  • Not at all Likely 43 43 30 26

IFIC
23
And if the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) determined that meat, milk, and eggs from
the offspring of cloned animals were safe, how
likely would you be to buy them? Would you say...?
Mar. July July
  • 2005 2006 2008
  • Total Likely 39 41 48
  • Very Likely 11 9 13
  • Somewhat Likely 28 32 35
  • Total Not Likely 57 59 51
  • Not Too Likely 20 29 27
  • Not at all Likely 37 30 24

IFIC
24
How much have you read or heard about the concept
of sustainable food production?
July July
  • 2007 2008
  • Total Read or Heard 30 41
  • A Lot 2 5
  • Some 11 15
  • A Little 17 21
  • Nothing At All 70 59

IFIC
25
How important is it to you that the food products
you purchase come from a food producer that is
enrolled in a scientifically validated
sustainability program? By sustainability, we
mean to operate in a manner which does not
jeopardize the availability of resources for
future generations.
July July
  • 2007 2008
  • Very Important 26 26
  • Somewhat Important 37 32
  • Neither Important nor Important 28 33
  • Not Very Important 4 4
  • Not At All Important 5 5

IFIC
26
SOURCE Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology,
http//pewagbiotech.org/research/2005update
27
SOURCE Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology,
http//pewagbiotech.org/research/2005update
28
In 2006 Syngenta-sponsored survey, of the
southern U.S. farms surveyed
  • 83 use Roundup Ready technology.
  • 42 of those use only glyphosate for weed
    control.
  • Average use period of Roundup Ready was 4.4
    years.
  • 39 of growers reported glyphosate resistant
    weeds.
  • Nationwide lt 5 of farmers would reduce use of
    Roundup Ready technology to solve resistance
    problems.
  • Southern farmers without resistance problems
    indicate that glyphosate resistance would cost
    them an extra 15-16 per acre for weed control
    and 7-8 yield loss.
  • 53 of southern farmers believe new products will
    solve the problem.

SOURCE http//deltafarmpress.com/mag/farming_indu
stry_works_preserve/
29
SOURCE Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology,
http//pewagbiotech.org/research/2006update
30
SOURCE Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology,
http//pewagbiotech.org/research/2006update
31
SOURCE Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology,
http//pewagbiotech.org/research/2006update
32
SOURCE Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology,
http//pewagbiotech.org/research/2006update
33
SOURCE Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology,
http//pewagbiotech.org/research/2006update
34
SOURCE Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology,
http//pewagbiotech.org/research/2006update
35
500 respondents
SOURCE Pirog, R. and Larson, A. 2007. Consumer
perceptions of the safety, health, and
environmental impact of various scales and
geographic origin of food supply chains. Leopold
Center for Sustainable Agriculture, September
2007. http//www.leopold.iastate.edu/pubs/staff/co
nsumer/consumer.htm
36
500 respondents
SOURCE Pirog, R. and Larson, A. 2007. Consumer
perceptions of the safety, health, and
environmental impact of various scales and
geographic origin of food supply chains. Leopold
Center for Sustainable Agriculture, September
2007. http//www.leopold.iastate.edu/pubs/staff/co
nsumer/consumer.htm
37
500 respondents
SOURCE Pirog, R. and Larson, A. 2007. Consumer
perceptions of the safety, health, and
environmental impact of various scales and
geographic origin of food supply chains. Leopold
Center for Sustainable Agriculture, September
2007. http//www.leopold.iastate.edu/pubs/staff/co
nsumer/consumer.htm
38
500 respondents
SOURCE Pirog, R. and Larson, A. 2007. Consumer
perceptions of the safety, health, and
environmental impact of various scales and
geographic origin of food supply chains. Leopold
Center for Sustainable Agriculture, September
2007. http//www.leopold.iastate.edu/pubs/staff/co
nsumer/consumer.htm
39
500 respondents
SOURCE Pirog, R. and Larson, A. 2007. Consumer
perceptions of the safety, health, and
environmental impact of various scales and
geographic origin of food supply chains. Leopold
Center for Sustainable Agriculture, September
2007. http//www.leopold.iastate.edu/pubs/staff/co
nsumer/consumer.htm
40
500 respondents
SOURCE Pirog, R. and Larson, A. 2007. Consumer
perceptions of the safety, health, and
environmental impact of various scales and
geographic origin of food supply chains. Leopold
Center for Sustainable Agriculture, September
2007. http//www.leopold.iastate.edu/pubs/staff/co
nsumer/consumer.htm
41
(No Transcript)
42
(No Transcript)
43
(No Transcript)
44
(No Transcript)
45
(No Transcript)
46
(No Transcript)
47
76 of National Association of Wheat Growers
approve biotech petition
SOURCE http//www.wheatworld.org/html/info.cfm?
ID21
48
Food Standards Agency (UK) survey, June 2009
Q3a. What food issues, if any, are you concerned
about? Base All respondents who are concerned
about food safety issues Q3b. Are you
concerned about any of the following food issues?
Base All respondents (Spontaneous answers over
4)
SOURCE Quarterly public tracker - June 2009,
Food Standards Agency (UK). http//www.food.gov.uk
/news/newsarchive/2009/aug/tracker
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com