Final Results of the project DEXA Motor Challenge Programme Dissemination, extension and application

1
Final Results of the projectDEXA Motor
ChallengeProgrammeDissemination, extension and
application of the Motor Challenge
ProgrammeEIE/04/164/S07.38650From 1st January
2005 to 30th June 2007
2
DEXA-MPC consortium
STEM - Swedish Energy Agency
MOTIVA
Fraunhofer ISI dena
SenterNovem
15 partners from 11countries
LEI
AEA - Austrian Energy Agency
ADEME AERE Edgard Blaustein
JSI - Jozef Stefan Institute - Energy Efficiency
Centre
ISR University of Coimbra ADENE
ENEA
CRES
3
DEXA The objectives of the project

• Main Objectives
• Long term introduction and integration of the
  Motor Challenge Programme into national energy
  programmes
• Development of the Motor Challenge Programme
  around Europe
• Implementation and dissemination actions (in more
  than150 enterprise interventions)
• Complete MCP technical toolset Refrigeration
  and Electrical distribution in the industry to
  be developped
• Create tools to support the MCP dissemination
  specific for SMEs (software and paper)

4
Results achieved by the project DEXA-MPC
DEXA-MCP activities and results are summarized
under the 3 following titles
? 1 - Dissemination of the Motor Challenge and
energy efficiency tools
? 2 Extension of the Motor Challenge programme
? 3 Integration of the MCP at the national
level for an efficient programme
5
? 1 - Dissemination of the Motor Challenge and
energy efficiency tools

• 247 Audits and MCP presentations
• ? 61 new Partners and 33 new Endorsers
• ? 10 case studies have been developed to be
  disseminated as Best practices.
• Contacts and promotion of the Motor Challenge
  programme through the organization of
• 18 Workshops and 62 Interventions in
  seminars/conferences
• More than 960 Meetings, interviews and MCP
  presentations and 2690 Emailing and mailing
  information about MCP
• Organization of 39 Trainings sessions
• Participation at EEMODS 05 at Heidelberg,
  Germany 200 attendees (3 papers from DEXA
  consortium).

6
? 1 - Dissemination of the Motor Challenge and
energy efficiency tools

• Construction of dissemination support tools
• 12 Posters,
• 5 Brochures,
• 10 leaflets,
• 13 information Internet websites or part of
  websites dedicated to the Motor Challenge
  Programme,
• 2 24 hours Hotline about MCP,
• 18 PowerPoint presentation and 4 small movies.
• Redaction or contribution of 76 articles on the
  Motor Challenge programme.

7
? 1 - Dissemination of the Motor Challenge and
energy efficiency tools few examples
Road show in Portugal
Promotion leaflet
Poster for exhibition
8
? 1 - Dissemination of the Motor Challenge and
energy efficiency tools few examples
European Motor Challenge workshop 27 February
2007
9

• 2 Extension of the Motor Challenge programme

• 5 new MCP contact points in Eastern Europe
  countries through the collaboration built by
  DEXA-MCP with the 4EM-MCP project.
• 4EM-MCP project website www.mcpeurope.net/4em
• 4 new contact points ready to integrate the MCP
  European network DEXA-MCP has established new
  contacts with Macedonia, Croatia, Cyprus, Malta,
  and Turkey and has tried to intensify the
  cooperation with Ireland and Great Britain.
• Good results have been received from
• ? Croatia,
• ? Macedonia,
• ? Turkey
• ? and UK
• for their integration into the MCP European
  network.

10

• 2 Extension of the Motor Challenge programme

• Integration of 2 new systems in the Motor
  Challenge and development of 2 new technical
  modules for these systems
• Industrial refrigeration systems
• and Industrial electricity distribution systems
  used within industrial plants.
• Creation of 2 new MCP tools
• 1 paper guide
• and 1 software tool
• These tools are more awareness than expert tools
  and the goal to achieve was to create a simple
  and easy to adapt base that could be used in all
  countries.

11

• 2 Extension of the Motor Challenge programme
  few examples

DEXA - Complete the MCP technical range

• 2 new technical modules have been being
  developed
• Industrial refrigeration9 Electricity
  consumption (specifically in some industrial
  sectors such as food industry, plastic
  industry,...) in EU-15 in 1999
• 6 to 10 TWh saving potential
• The study of the industrial refrigeration
  systems extended to the EU-27 in 2002 have shown
  that the energy consumption is more than 100TWh/y
  (around 6 of the industrial electricity
  consumption).
• Industrial electricity distribution systemsFor
  instance 5 TWh saving potential with industrial
  distribution transformers

12

• 2 Extension of the Motor Challenge programme
  few examples

The new technical guide a tool designed for the
SMEs
13

• 2 Extension of the Motor Challenge programme
  few examples

The new software a tool designed for the SMEs
14
? 3 Integration of the MCP at the national
level for an efficient programme

• Translation of the MCP toolset in the different
  languages
• The translation of the already existing technical
  modules in national languages completed for the
  new countries being part of the DEXA-MCP
  consortium Slovenia, Lithuania and Finland.
• Translation from the English of the 2 new modules
  in all the 10 different languages of the project
  German, Slovenian, Lithuanian, Portuguese,
  Swedish, Greek, Italian, Dutch, French and
  Finnish.
• Translation from the English of the 2 new tools
  (paper guide and software) in the different
  languages
• Paper technical guide French, Italian,
  Portuguese, Slovenian, Finnish, German.
• Software tool French, Italian, German, Finnish,
  Greek, Lithuanian, Portuguese, Swedish, Slovenian

15
? 3 Integration of the MCP at the national
level for an efficient programme
Long term introduction of MCP into national
energy programme
1. All EU countries have national Energy
Efficiency programmes 2. MCP is flexible and
developed regarding these national programmes 3.
MCP is a supplementary, a complementary tool. It
is common European banner that gives the
opportunity to offer visibility to the potential
savings in Motor Driven systems
16
? 3 Integration of the MCP at the national
level for an efficient programme few examples

• France

Information and training

• E consumption
• Saving potential
• Steps to implement
• MCP action plan

AUDIT
NCP
Guidelines
Information, incentives, training
17
? 3 Integration of the MCP at the national
level for an efficient programme few examples

• Sweden
• Integration with the voluntary energy efficiency
  program (PFE).
• Audit results are reported to the Energy Agency.
• Finland
• MCP Integration into the national Energy
  Efficiency Agreements
• simplified annual reporting using the national
  one information on reported energy efficiency
  potentials and measures to Motiva who will give
  the summary information to the Commission

18
? 3 Integration of the MCP at the national
level for an efficient programme few examples

• The Netherlands
• Usergroup on MCP, started january 25, 2007
• Since 2007 MCP-actionplan is on the list of
  Tax-reduction
• National MCP Event, scheduled for October 2007

19
? 3 Integration of the MCP at the national
level for an efficient programme few examples

• Italy
• Training courses to Energy Managers,
• Brochure about White certificates
• Information and application on Fiscal deduction
  about high efficiency motors and VSD
• Case study on MCP applied to water pumps station
• Training, Application and Dissemination of MCP
  among SMEs
• Energy managers, White certificates Fiscal
  deduction are connected to National Programme on
  Energy Efficiency

20
? 3 Integration of the MCP at the national
level for an efficient programme few examples

• Austria
• Integration in the national climatechange
  programme
• the first focus in the energy - efficient
  companies module will be on electric motor
  systems in companies
• workshops for consultants
• information material in addition to MCP technical
  guidelines

21
? 3 Integration of the MCP at the national
level for an efficient programme few examples

• Examples of Market Activities
• MCP award ceremony,
• press-releases
• analysis of 10 energy audits (-12 saving
  potential)
• Best Practice Examples (4 MCP energy-audits)
• Follow up activities
• National Conference on electricity efficiency
  with motor supplyer
• training for compressed air consultant
• 7 top CAS saving measures with quick assessment
  procedure

22
DEXA-MPC conclusions and lessons learnt
The 3 main conclusions of the DEXA-MCP project
are the following ones 1 Knowledge about cost
effective energy efficiency measures in motor
driven systems is still not very common in
enterprises and their remains a strong need to
further disseminate information with new tools
and continuous efforts. The Motor Challenge
programme has proved to be a good tool for a EU
wide approach for efficiently helping to support
the European Industries by developing common
tools and supporting industrial efforts. The
public support of the programme should therefore
be constant in the time and avoid breaks due to
periods without any public funding.
23
DEXA-MPC conclusions and lessons learnt
The 3 main conclusions of the DEXA-MCP project
are the following ones 2 Helping the
enterprise to act and improve their energy
efficiency is essential. The support of walk
through audits and auditing programmes are one
key to identify energy efficiency measures.
Enterprises highly welcome the support of an
expert to realize the audit and to follow the
implementation of measures. Training of energy
auditors in the field of motor driven systems is
essential. Convincing the enterprises to use this
expertise is facilitated by the public support
and engagement of the EC and the national
governments. The second key to help the
enterprises to act is to train their internal
staff and especially in the SMEs.
24
DEXA-MPC conclusions and lessons learnt
The 3 main conclusions of the DEXA-MCP project
are the following ones 3 - To further develop
the outreach of the Motor Challenge Programme in
the EC two levels of actions are required a real
and permanent European Coordination and support
by public funding is essential for the long term
success of the program and its required impact on
energy savings and emission reductions and a
strong coordination at the national level is
essential in order to integrate the programme
within the national context, organizations and
policies. The national contact points of the
program are the key players for the further
outreach and development of the Motor Challenge
Programme.
25
Thanks to all the participants of DEXA-MCP for
their fruitful contribution to the success of the
project
Thanks to the JRC and Paolo Bertoldi for its
collaboration
Thanks to Europeump BCAS Eurovent ECI for their
collaboration with the project
Results of the project available at the websites
www.ademe.fr/dexa-MCP www.motor-challenge.eu