How Does a Baseball Bat Work? The Physics of the Ball-Bat Collision Nuclear Chemistry Gordon Conference June 19, 2003 Alan M. Nathan University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign a-nathan@uiuc.edu http://www.npl.uiuc.edu/~a-nathan/pob - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

How Does a Baseball Bat Work? The Physics of the Ball-Bat Collision Nuclear Chemistry Gordon Conference June 19, 2003 Alan M. Nathan University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign a-nathan@uiuc.edu http://www.npl.uiuc.edu/~a-nathan/pob

Description:

Step 3: Expand in normal modes and solve ... in tennis, golf, aluminum bats, ... demo ... easier to swing and control. but less effective at transferring energy ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:364
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: AlanMN
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: How Does a Baseball Bat Work? The Physics of the Ball-Bat Collision Nuclear Chemistry Gordon Conference June 19, 2003 Alan M. Nathan University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign a-nathan@uiuc.edu http://www.npl.uiuc.edu/~a-nathan/pob


1
How Does a Baseball Bat Work?The Physics of the
Ball-Bat Collision Nuclear Chemistry Gordon
ConferenceJune 19, 2003Alan M. Nathan
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaigna-nath
an_at_uiuc.eduhttp//www.npl.uiuc.edu/a-nathan/pob
  • introduction
  • kinematics of the ball-bat collision
  • dynamic model for the ball-bat collision
  • applications wood, aluminum, corked
  • summary/conclusions

2
Baseball and Physics
3
Introduction to the Ball-Bat Collision
  • forces large (gt8000 lbs!)
  • time short (lt1/1000 sec!)
  • ball compresses, stops, expands
  • kinetic energy ? potential energy
  • lots of energy dissipated
  • bat is flexible
  • bat bends, compresses
  • the goals...
  • large hit ball speed
  • good contact

4
high-speed video of collision
These movies are owned by CE Composites Baseball
(combatbaseball.com), designers and manufacturers
of composite baseball bats, Ottawa, Ontario,
Canada, and are shown here with their permission.
5
Kinematics of Ball-Bat Collision
r bat recoil factor mball/mbat,eff (momentum
and angular momentum conservation) e
coefficient of restitution (energy
dissipation)
typical numbers vf 0.2 vball 1.2 vbat
6
Kinematics the recoil factor
  • r mball/mbat,eff mbat,eff Ip/b2
  • typically pivot point is 6 from knob
  • r 0.25 for collision 6 from barrel end
  • mass in handle doesnt help
  • larger Ip better but ...

7
Recent ASA Slow-Pitch Softball Field Tests(L. V.
Smith, J. Broker, AMN)
  • Conclusions
  • bat speed depends more on I6 than M
  • vbat (1/I6)1/4
  • rotation point close to knob

Ideal bat weight/MOI not easy to determine
8
Aside Wood-Aluminum Differences
  • Inertial differences
  • CM closer to hands, further from barrel for
    aluminum
  • ? Mbat,eff smaller ?
  • larger recoil factor r, smaller eA
  • effectively, less mass near impact location
  • ? MOIknob smaller ? swing speed higher
  • ? cancels ? for many bats ? ?
  • but definite advantage for contact hitter ?
  • Dynamic differences
  • Ball-Bat COR significantly larger for aluminum ?
  • more on this later

9
Dynamics of Ball-Bat CollisionCOR and Energy
Dissipation
  • e ? COR ? vrel,after/vrel,before
  • in CM frame (final KE/initial KE) e2
  • baseball on hard floor e2 hf/hi ? 0.25
  • typically e ? 0.5
  • 3/4 CM energy dissipated!
  • depends (weakly) on v
  • the bat matters too!
  • vibrations ?
  • trampoline effect ?

10
Accounting for Energy Dissipation Dynamic Model
for Ball-Bat Colllision
  • Bat is flexible on short time scale
  • Collision excites vibrations
  • Vibrations reduce COR
  • Energy going to vibrations depends on
  • Impact location relative to nodes
  • Collision time (0.6 ms) relative to 1/fvib

see AMN, Am. J. Phys, 68, 979
(2000)
11
The Details A Dynamic Model
  • Step 1 Solve eigenvalue problem for free
    vibrations
  • Step 2 Ball-bat interaction (F) modeled as
    nonlinear lossy spring
  • Step 3 Expand in normal modes and solve

12
Normal Modes of the Bat Modal Analysis
demo
13
Ball-Bat Force
  • Details not important
  • --as long as e(v), ?(v) about right
  • Measureable with load cell

?
14
Effect of Bat on COR Vibrations
the sweet spot
COR depends strongly on impact location
15
Comparison with Data Ball Exit
Speed Louisville Slugger R161, 33/31
only lowest mode excited
lowest 4 modes excited
Conclusion essential physics under control
16
time evolution
  • rigid-body motion develops only after few ms
  • far end of bat has no effect on ball
  • knob moves after 0.6 ms
  • collision over after 0.6 ms
  • nothing on knob end matters
  • size, shape
  • boundary conditions
  • hands

17
Vf independent of end support
Data courtesy of Keith Koenig
18
Flexible Bat and the Trampoline Effect
Losses in ball anti-correlated with vibrations in
bat
19
The Trampoline Effect
  • Compressional energy shared between ball and bat
  • PEbat/PEball kball/kbat
  • 75 of PEball dissipated
  • If some energy stored in bat and if PEbat
    effectively returned to ball, then COR larger
  • Effect occurs in tennis, golf, aluminum bats, ...

demo
20
The Trampoline Effect A Closer Look
21
The Trampoline EffectA Closer Look
  • Bending Modes vs. Hoop Modes

22
Modal analysis Dan Russell and AMN
hoop modes
hoop modes
23
COR vs. Hoop Mode Frequency
24
Where Does the Energy Go?
25
Some Interesting Consequences(work in progress)
  • e/e0 increases with
  • Ball stiffness
  • Impact velocity
  • Decreasing wall thickness
  • Decreasing ball COR
  • Note effects larger for low-s
    (high-performance) than for high-s
    (low-performance) bats
  • Tuning a bat
  • Tune by balancing between storing energy (k
    small) and returning it (f large)
  • Tuning not simply related to phase of vibration
    at time of ball-bat separation

s ? kbat/kball e2 ? (1se02 )/(s1) e ? 1 for s
ltlt 1
26
Some Interesting Consequences(work in progress)
  • USGA pendulum test---(Wed. NYT)
  • 4 parameters
  • mball, mclub, kball, kclub
  • make mball gtgt mclub and kball gtgt kclub
  • heavy, stiff steel ball on clubhead
  • collision time determined by mball (known) and
    kclub
  • measure collision time to determine kclub
  • kclub determines trampoline effect
  • implementation expected Jan. 2004

27
So Whats the Deal with Corked Bats?
  • 1 diameter hole 10 deep fill with whatever
  • similar to aluminum bat
  • easier to swing and control ?
  • but less effective at transferring energy ?
  • Is there a trampoline effect from hole or
    filler?
  • probably not ?
  • Net result
  • little or no effect for home run hitter ?
  • possible advantage for contact hitter ?

28
Bat Research Center, UML, Sherwood amn, Aug.
2001
Not Corked DATA Corked COR
0.445 ? 0.005 0.444 ? 0.005
  • Conclusions
  • no trampoline effect!
  • no advantage to corked
  • for home run hitter
  • possible advantage for
  • contact hitter

calculation
29
Summary
  • Dynamic model developed for ball-bat collision
  • flexible nature of bat included
  • simple model for ball-bat force
  • Vibrations play major role in COR for collisions
    off sweet spot
  • Far end of bat does not matter in collision
  • Physics of trampoline effect mostly understood
    and interesting consequences predicted
  • Corking bat has little effect on home run

30
And in conclusion...
  • Thanks for inviting me here
  • I love talking about this stuff, so ask me lots
    of questions!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com