SETDA Technical Assistance Partnership Program TAPP - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

SETDA Technical Assistance Partnership Program TAPP

Description:

student performance/engagement. parental involvement. Random Assignment. Evaluation ... Free pager rings 90 times over 180 day school year ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: k12schooln
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: SETDA Technical Assistance Partnership Program TAPP


1
SETDA Technical Assistance Partnership Program
(TAPP)
  • Progress, Challenges, and Data with the USDOE
    ESETP Grants

2
National Trends Report EETT Year 2 in Review
  • Mary Ann Wolf
  • SETDA

3
EETT Supports NCLB
  • The technology funding from the No Child Left
    Behind, Title II D program directly supports NCLB
    goals in three distinct ways
  • Closing the achievement gap by providing access
    of software, online resources, and virtual
    learning aligned to academic standards for
    instruction and learning.
  • Supporting the development of highly qualified
    teachers by providing online courses, communities
    of practice, and virtual communication that
    ensure flexibility and access.
  • Enhancing data systems to ensure that educators
    can utilize real-time data to inform sound
    instructional decisions and ensure meet AYP.

4
Key Findings
  • The program has seen a tremendous increase in the
    number of states (78) that are using these
    technology funds for assessment, outreach to
    parents, and data-driven decision-making.
  • 74 of states focused on reading or writing, and
    38 focused on mathematics.
  • 12 (or 25 of) states do not receive any state
    technology funding.
  • 147,000,000 of grant funds was dedicated to
    professional development during Round 2 of the
    NCLB II D

5
SETDA TAPP
  • 9 of 10 ESETP Grantees Participate for Networking
    and Dissemination
  • Virtual Roundtables
  • Presentations
  • www.setdatapp.org

6
Implementation - Program and Methodology
  • Saul Rockman, WV EDPACE
  • Mark Hoffman, PA Department of Education
  • Dale Mann, WV EETT

7
ED PACE Educational Development for Planning
and Conducting Evaluations Saul
RockmanRockman, Et. Al.
8
Goals
  • Provide empirical data on student achievement in
    virtual foreign language courses
  • Develop a framework for scientifically-based
    research that can be used at the local, state,
    and national level to measure the impact of
    technology-enhanced programs on student
    achievement

9
Summative Research Model
  • Research Question
  • Does participation in program lead to student
    achievement gains?
  • Method
  • Quasi-experimental design

10
Outcome Measures
  • Individual Achievement data from WVEIS
  • A state standardized test
  • WESTEST (2004-2006)
  • SAT9 (2001-2003)
  • A rubric-scored writing assessment
  • 7th and 10th grade only
  • UNIACT Interest Inventory
  • ACT Explore (8th)
  • ACT Plan (10th)
  • Spanish I Assessment developed by the project

11
Development of Spanish I Assessment
  • Based on NAEP Foreign Language specifications
  • Assessment of 3 modes of communication
    Interpersonal
  • Interpretive
  • Presentational
  • Student Oral Proficiency Assessment (SOPA)
  • Background Questionnaire and Self Assessment

12
Summative Findings
  • Standardized Test Measures (Non-Spanish)
  • Virtual Spanish students tended to achieve
    similarly to face-to-face students
  • Virtual Spanish students tended to achieve higher
    than those with no foreign language instruction
  • Spanish Assessment
  • Test performed very well
  • Results Overall, VS students performed similarly
    to face-to-face students. (Some differences on
    sub-tests)

13
Pennsylvania eSPARC
  • Mark Hoffman
  • PA Department of Education

14
Evaluation of Student and Parent Access through
Recycled Computers
PA Department of Education
Carbon Lehigh Intermediate Unit 21
Westat Research
In Cooperation with
15
USDOE State Evaluation Grants
  • PA awarded 1.8 million to study the impact of
    home access to a computer and the Internet on
  • student performance/engagement
  • parental involvement
  • Random AssignmentEvaluation

16
eSPARC District Partners
  • Allentown (86 households)
  • Bethlehem (54 households)
  • Harrisburg (106 households)
  • York (109 households)

17
What do participants get?
  • Dell Pentium II / III computer
  • Internet access (AOL)
  • Deskjet printer
  • Microsoft Office, others
  • Computer training
  • Technical support
  • Access to resources

18
Computer Rollout
  • Mandatory training
  • 2-hour Internet Safety
  • 5-hour Get to know your computer
  • School-based
  • District teachers serving as trainers

19
Challenges / Lessons Learned
  • Support Services
  • Technical support
  • Training sessions
  • Time
  • To recruit participating districts and families
  • To achieve partner district buy-in
  • To create training models/curriculum
  • To effectively prepare and roll out machines
  • To offer support services

20
WV EETT
  • Dale Mann
  • Interactive, Inc.

21
Using Technology to Study Technology Evaluating
West Virginias Model School Project Enhancing
Education Through Technology
Brenda Williams West Virginia Dept of Education
  • Dale Mann, Ph.D.
  • Interactive, Inc.


Wednesday, March 23, 2005
22
Four Policy/Research Questions
  • Professional Development Does on-site,
    classroom professional development work (the TIS
    strategy) and how do we know?
  • Technology Integration into Classroom
    Instruction How much change in the classroom use
    of computers will there be?
  • Student achievement Are there associated
    changes?
  • Turnkey Training and Continuing Effects After
    the TIS specialists are done (June 2005), what
    will happen? Will teachers continue to use
    technology (2005-06)?

23
Conventional Wisdom aboutInstructional
Technology and Professional Development
  • WHAT DO WE KNOW ABOUT
  • 1. How much technology is being used?
  • 2. What is technology being used for?
  • 3. When we do professional development, does it
    work?
  • 4. If it works, how long does the impact last?
    (turnkey training)
  • TYPICALLY, HOW DO WE KNOW ABOUT THAT?1. Stand in
    the back, peek through the windows?2. Smile
    checks (teacher self-reports)?3. Purchase
    orders?4. Workshop counts?

24
USING TECHNOLOGY TO MEASURE TECHNOLOGY
  • Meters in desktops
  • Software runs in the background 24/7
  • Records file activity only
  • Installed on classroom computers only
  • Data e-mailed directly to Interactive, Inc.
  • ZERO burden on teachers
  • Pagers on teachers web surveys
  • Free pager rings 90 times over 180 day school
    year
  • When pager rings, or as soon as convenient,
    teacher and one randomly selected student take
    short web-survey
  • Pages are randomly scheduled during alternate
    weeks (not more than 5 per week)

25
Logistics
  • 18 Technology Integration Specialists (14
    counties)
  • 28 TIS schools 25 blue team schools
  • 124 TIS-school teachers 103 blue team teachers
  • 341 TrueActive software licenses
  • 118 Rampage phone pagers
  • Field and return 227 QREs
  • Install TrueActive software
  • Distribute and test pagers
  • Insure return of weekly activity logs by TISs

26
Policy Topics
  • Classroom integration of technology
  • Intensive, onsite professional development
  • Impact on teachers repertoire
  • Impact on students learning
  • Impact on student achievement
  • Duration of train-the-trainer effects

27
  • Interactive, Inc.61 Green Street
  • Huntington, New York 11743phone 631 351
    1190fax 631 351 1194
  • e interinc_at_aol.com (or)
  • dmann_at_interactiveinc.org

28
Roundtable Discussion Questions
  • What type of research is your state, district,
    school, or organization conducting?
  • What challenges do you see in trying to implement
    research like you heard about today?
  • What are some things you can take from the
    lessons learned to ensure that you can conduct
    research effectively?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com