Why protect endangered species? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Why protect endangered species?

Description:

Why protect endangered species? ... What is an 'endangered species' ... Who determines whether a species is endangered, and how do they make that determination? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:218
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: davids1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Why protect endangered species?


1
Why protect endangered species? Did you find
Wilsons case for worrying about species loss
persuasive or unpersuasive? Why?
2
What is an endangered species?
Sec. 3 Definitions (6) The term ''endangered
species'' means any species which is in danger of
extinction throughout all or a significant
portion of its range other than certain pest
insects.
(16) The term ''species'' includes any subspecies
of fish or wildlife or plants, and any distinct
population segment of any species of vertebrate
fish or wildlife which interbreeds when mature.
3
Who determines whether a species is endangered,
and how do they make that determination?
ESA Section 4 Determination of endangered
species and threatened species (a) Generally
(1)   The Secretary shall by regulation
determine whether any species is an endangered
species or a threatened species because of any of
the following factors (A) the present or
threatened destruction, modification, or
curtailment of its habitat or range (B)
overutilization for commercial, recreational,
scientific, or educational purposes (C) disease
or predation (D) the inadequacy of existing
regulatory mechanisms or (E) other natural or
manmade factors affecting its continued existence.
4
Who determines whether a species is endangered,
and how do they make that determination?
? Gnatcatcher ? California gnatcatcher ?
Coastal California gnatcatcher
5
What does the ESA require of federal agencies?
Sec. 7 Interagency cooperation (a) Federal
agency actions and consultations (2) Each
Federal agency shall, in consultation with and
with the assistance of the Secretary, insure that
any action authorized, funded, or carried out by
such agency is not likely to jeopardize the
continued existence of any endangered species or
threatened species or result in the destruction
or adverse modification of habitat of such
species
6
TVA v. Hill
1967 Congress authorized Tellico Dam
construction commenced 1967-late 73
Unsuccessful litigation (NEPA, other) challenging
dam Mid-1973 Snail darter discovered by David
Etnier Late 1973 ESA passed 1975 Snail darter
listed critical habitat designated Feb. 1976
ESA challenge filed
7
Madison v. Ducktown Sulphur Shall we grant
plaintiffs request to blot out two great mining
and manufacturing enterprises, destroy half of
the taxable values of a county, and drive more
than 10,000 people from their homes?
TVA v. Hill Congress was concerned about the
unknown uses that endangered species might have
and about the unforeseeable place such creature
may have in the chain of life on this planet
The plain intent of Congress was to halt and
reverse the trend toward species extinction,
whatever the cost.
8
Sec. 7 Interagency cooperation (a) Federal
agency actions and consultations (1) Each
Federal agency shall, in consultation with and
with the assistance of the Secretary, insure that
any action authorized, funded, or carried out by
such agency is not likely to jeopardize the
continued existence of any endangered species or
threatened species or result in the destruction
or adverse modification of habitat of such
species
unless such agency has been granted an exemption
for such action by the Committee pursuant to
subsection (h) of this section. The God Squad
9
TVA v. Hill -- postscript 1967 Congress
authorized Tellico Dam construction
commenced 1967-late 73 Unsuccessful litigation
(NEPA, other) challenging dam Mid-1973 Snail
darter discovered by David Etnier Late 1973 ESA
passed 1975 Snail darter listed critical
habitat designated Feb. 1976 ESA challenge
filed 1980 Congress passes rider exempting
Tellico from ESA 2000 Etnier urges delisting of
snail darter says 100,000 exist
10
What does the ESA require of private sector
actors?
Sec. 9 Prohibited acts (a) Generally (1) Except
as provided in 1539 of this title, with respect
to any endangered species of fish or wildlife
listed pursuant to section 1533 of this title it
is unlawful for any person subject to the
jurisdiction of the United States to (B) take
any such species within the United States or the
territorial sea of the United States
Sec. 3 Definitions (19) The term ''take'' means
to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound,
kill, trap, capture, or collect, or to attempt to
engage in any such conduct.
11
What does harm mean?
Palila I (9th Cir. 1981) feral sheep ? mamane
trees ? harms palila by degrading palila
habitat
50 CFR Sec. 17.3 harm means an act which
actually kills or injures wildlife including
significant habitat modification or degradation
where it actually kills or injures wildlife by
significantly impairing essential behavioral
patterns, including breeding, feeding, or
sheltering.
12
What does harm mean?
Palila II (9th Cir. 1986) wild sheep ? degrade
palila habitat But does this harm palila?
Palila population recovering 1979-86, after
removal of feral sheep and goats after Palila I
Harm need not imply death to individual palila.
Rather, habitat modification that could cause
extinction of the species is the injury that
harms the palila
13
Babbitt v. Sweet Home (1995)
Loggers challenge 50 CFR Sec. 17.3 harm means
an act which actually kills or injures wildlife
including significant habitat modification or
degradation where it actually kills or injures
wildlife by significantly impairing essential
behavioral patterns, including breeding, feeding,
or sheltering. Logging destroys habitat of red
cockaded woodpecker (east) and spotted owl
(west) Should harm be confined to direct
applications of force? Is the statutory term
limited in this way?
14
Babbitt v. Sweet Home (1995)
  • What are OConnor and Scalia worried about? Why
    the argument over the difference between habitat
    modification that affects
  • The ability of the population to grow
  • Unborn members of the species
  • The ability of existing members to breed?
  • Likewise, what is their argument about causation
    and foreseeability all about?

15
Section 10(a) Incidental Taking
Permits/HCPs (1) The Secretary may permit, under
such terms and conditions as he shall prescribe -
(B)   any taking otherwise prohibited by
section 1538(a)(1)(B) of this title if such
taking is incidental to, and not the purpose of,
the carrying out of an otherwise lawful activity.
16
Section 10(a) Incidental Taking
Permits/HCPs (2) (A) No permit may be issued by
the Secretary authorizing any taking referred to
in paragraph (1)(B) unless the applicant therefor
submits to the Secretary a conservation plan that
specifies - (i) the impact which will likely
result from such taking (ii) what steps the
applicant will take to minimize and mitigate such
impacts (iii) what alternative actions to such
taking the applicant considered and (iv) such
other measures that the Secretary may require as
being necessary or appropriate for purposes of
the plan. Hardship Exemptions
17
ESA Sec. 9(a)(2) with respect to any endangered
species of plants listed pursuant to section 4
, it is unlawful for any person subject to the
jurisdiction of the United States to (A)
import any such species into, or export any such
species from, the United States (B) remove
and reduce to possession any such species from
areas under Federal jurisdiction maliciously
damage or destroy any such species on any such
area or remove, cut, dig up, or damage or
destroy any such species on any other area in
knowing violation of any law or regulation of any
State or in the course of any violation of a
State criminal trespass law
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com