Fast Handoff in 802'11a WiFi Networks - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Fast Handoff in 802'11a WiFi Networks

Description:

... have a cell based topology just like regular mobile phones ... Cordless phones. Microwaves. 802.11n: Channel bonding. Power consumption. OFDM reduces power ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:100
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: Davi738
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Fast Handoff in 802'11a WiFi Networks


1
Fast Handoff in 802.11a WiFi Networks
  • Honours Proposal
  • David Murray
  • Supervisors Mike Dixon and Terry Koziniec

2
Handoff in WiFi Networks
  • WiFi networks are short range 50 100m
  • Large deployments need many Access Points (APs)
  • WiFi Networks have a cell based topology just
    like regular mobile phones
  • Handoff is the connectivity transfer that occurs
    when moving between cells

50 - 100m
3
Why do we need fast handoff
  • WiFi Networks were designed for nomadic
    operation.
  • Wireless networks no longer solely service
    laptops and computers
  • VoWiFi phones
  • This research in fast handoff is a subset of
    VoWiFi
  • VoIP (Voice over IP)
  • WiFi (Wireless Networks)

4
VoIP (Voice over IP)
  • VoIP is the use of the IP (data) network for
    voice traffic
  • Cost savings arise from only requiring one
    network.

5
WiFi (802.11)
  • Wireless networks allow mobile connectivity
  • Tremendous growth
  • WLANs are now found in homes, cafes, businesses
    and universities

6
VoWiFi
  • VoWiFi is the transmission of voice over a WiFi
    network
  • Enterprise market
  • Telstra
  • Home dual band cell/WiFi market
  • Future

7
VoWiFi Issues Handoff
  • Handoff occurs when a client moves between
    wireless cells
  • Difficult and time consuming process and results
    in loss of connectivity
  • The longer the handoff process, bigger the
    disruption to the conversation
  • Research has shown that handoff is possible in
    802.11b networks
  • It is believed that handoff in 802.11a networks
    will be 8/3 or 2.66 times longer

8
802.11 Physical Layer Standards
  • 802.11b
  • DSSS Modulation 11Mbps data rate
  • 2.4 GHz band 3 non-overlapping channels
  • 802.11g
  • OFDM modulation 54mbps data rate
  • 2.4 GHz band 3 non-overlapping channels
  • Backwards compatible with 802.11b
  • 802.11a
  • OFDM modulation 54mbps data rate
  • 5 GHz band 8 non-overlapping channels
  • Not compatible with 802.11b/g

9
802.11a A better medium for voice
  • Interference causes packet loss (a disaster for
    voice calls)
  • 2.4 GHz spectrum current and future problems
  • Bluetooth
  • Cordless phones
  • Microwaves
  • 802.11n Channel bonding
  • Power consumption
  • OFDM reduces power
  • 802.11a devices typically use less power
  • 802.11a 40mw
  • 802.11b 100mw
  • If 802.11a can support low latency (sub 50 ms)
    handoffs it is a prime candidate for VoWiFi

10
Handoff Explained
  • Detection
  • Scanning
  • Decision

11
Handoff Explained Detection
  • The detection phase is about as advanced as your
    car radio
  • Physical limitations of wireless (radio) networks
  • A client card can only be on one channel at any
    one time.
  • Clients are unaware of surrounding APs until
    they begin scanning
  • The client will wait until the signal drops below
    a predefined threshold before scanning for better
    APs

12
Handoff Explained Scanning
  • When a client has detected the need to start
    scanning they will scan every channel.
  • Remember 802.11b/g has 3 non-overlapping
    channels. 802.11a has 8 non-overlapping channels
  • This has obvious implications on scanning latency
    in 802.11a and 802.11b/g networks
  • The IEEE define two scanning mechanisms
  • Passive scanning
  • Active Scanning
  • Depending on the mechanisms used the scanning
    phase can take up to 1.1 seconds

13
Handoff Explained Decision
  • The decision phase compares the strongest signal
    found in the scanning phase with the signal
    received from the old AP
  • Signal strengths are not static
  • To prevent clients from ping ponging between
    APs the new AP must offer a considerably better
    signal strength

14
Experiment 1 Empirically Test Scanning in
802.11a Networks
  • This experiment involves moving a 802.11a client
    between two APs and sniffing the traffic
  • This is harder than it looks!
  • The difficulty is in sniffing management frames,
    which requires specific hardware software and
    Linux knowledge
  • By sniffing the management frames, it will be
    possible to determine total handoff time and the
    intricacies (if any) of 802.11a scanning

15
Passive Scanning
  • Passive scanning is the slowest scanning
    mechanism
  • Passive scanning relies on beacons which are
    broadcasted by default every 100 ms
  • Every wireless device using passive scanning must
    passively scan for 100ms on every channel.
  • Passive scanning in 802.11b/g 300 ms
  • Passive scanning in 802.11a 800 ms
  • Why would anyone use passive scanning when there
    are faster mechanisms available? Answer power
    consumption

16
Improvements to Passive Scanning
  • By lowering the beacon interval it is possible to
    reduce passive scanning delays
  • A beacon interval of 50 ms results in
  • Passive scanning in 802.11b/g 150ms
  • Passive scanning in 802.11a 400 ms
  • While this is a good way to reduce scanning
    delays, it suffers from scalability issues.
  • Halving the beacon interval has the effect of
    halving the scanning delay but doubling the
    bandwidth used by

17
Experiment 2 Passive Scanning in 802.11a networks
  • Scaling the beacon interval will be more
    efficient in 802.11a of OFDM networks
  • DSSS (802.11b) management frames _at_ 1 2 mbps
  • OFDM (802.11a/g) management frames _at_ 6 24 mbps
  • We should see efficiencies in the order of 12x
  • Despite the fact that we have 2.66 more channels
    to scan, at what cost can we support fast (sub
    50ms) handoffs

18
Active Scanning
  • Active scanning involves aggressively probing
    channels for APs
  • There are two timers that dictate how long a
    client will scan each channel
  • Min Channel Time
  • Max Channel Time
  • Lowering these timers will lower the time spend
    scanning each channel
  • Lowering these timers is a double edged sword. If
    timers are set to low clients will miss APs

19
Experiment 3 Improving Active Scanning
  • By optimising min and max channel times it is
    possible to lower active scanning times
  • The changing of these timers is beyond what can
    be done in the labs
  • I will use OPNET modeller to model the impact of
    changing scanning times

20
Conclusion
  • I propose to research the scanning phase of
    802.11a handoff to support voice traffic
  • Three experiments
  • An empirical study of 802.11a handoff
  • Scaling beacon intervals to reduce passive
    scanning times
  • Optimising min and max channel timers to improve
    active scanning

21
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com