Title: Cardiovascular Epidemiology: Definitions Historical Perspectives and Assessing Risk of CVD Recent trends and population differences in CHD and CHD risk factors
1Cardiovascular EpidemiologyDefinitionsHistori
cal Perspectives and Assessing Risk of
CVDRecent trends and population differences in
CHD and CHD risk factors
Nathan Wong
2Definitions
- CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE or CVD includes CORONARY
ARTERY DISEASE and other cardiac conditions
(congenital, arrhythmias, and congestive heart
failure) - CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE (CAD) or CORONARY HEART
DISEASE (CHD) (often broadly referred to as
ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE (IHD) primarily
myocardial infarction and sudden coronary death,
broader definition may include angina pectoris,
atherosclerosis, positive angiogram,
revascularization, and myocardial infarction
3Definitions (cont.)
- REVASCULARIZATION includes coronary artery bypass
graft (CABG), percutaneous transluminal coronary
angioplasty (PTCA), stent, and atherectomy - CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE includes stroke (ischemic
or hemorrhagic) and transient ischemic attack
(TIA) - PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE includes carotid
artery disease and intermittent claudication - SURROGATE MEASURES include carotid intimal
medial thickness (IMT), coronary calcium,
angiographic stenosis, brachial ultrasound flow
mediated dilatation (FMD)
4Tools for Diagnosis of CHD
- Medical history risk factors, including family
history, assessment of angina pectoris (Rose
questionnaire) - Electrocardiogram (12-lead resting)
- Exercise stress ECG or thallium ECG
- Echocardiogram (m-mode evaluation of wall
thickeness, LV hypertrophy, 2D evaluation of wall
motion abnormalities, ejection fraction) - Nuclear testing (sestamibi scans)
- Coronary angiography
5Historical Perspectives of CVD Epidemiology
- Concept of risk factors, coined by Framingham
Heart Study, involved gaining understanding of
factors predisposing to occurrence of CVD - Framingham Heart Study was the first large-scale
epidemiologic study, begun in 1948 among 5,209
men and women. - First demonstrated epidemiologic relations of
cigarette smoking, blood pressure, and
cholesterol levels to incidence of CHD.
6Misconceptions Corrected
- Blood pressure originally thought to be normal to
rise with age to ensure adequate perfusion as
arteries narrowed, and elevated diastolic blood
pressure felt to cause all problems - Skepticism about cholesterol as a risk factor for
CHD persisted into the 1980s until epidemiologic
research and clinical trials proved otherwise - Before epidemiologic studies, physical activity
was thought to be dangerous to CHD candidates - Left ventricular hypertrophy now shown to be an
ominous harbinger to CHD rather than as a
compensatory response to hypertension. - CHD is a multifactorial process involving many
predisposing factors.
7Cardiovascular Risk Profiles
- Risk factors easily obtained during an office
visit can help assess future risk of CHD - For CHD, these include serum cholesterol,
hypertension, diabetes, ECG-LVH, and cigarette
smoking, and from more recent profiles, LDL-C
(instead of total cholesterol) and
HDL-cholesterol. - Tables provide easy determination of 10-year risk
of CHD, stroke, peripheral vascular disease, and
congestive heart failure. - A simplified version of the CHD table allows use
of JNC-VI and NCEP classifications of blood
pressure and LDL-cholesterol levels.
8Cardiovascular Risk Profiles (continued)
- These tables show risk to be additive across
categories of two or more risk factors - Risk increases across levels of one risk factor
(e.g., cholesterol) may be much greater if other
risk factors (e.g., diabetes and hypertension)
are present, than if no other risk factors are
present - Short-term (e.g., 10 years) risk may, however,
not relate to longer, lifetime risk.
9Differences and Trends in CHD and CHD Risk
Factors across Populations
- International comparisons in incidence
- Comparisons across regions of the United States
and among ethnic groups - Trends in CHD incidence across countries
- Trends in CHD risk factors and ethnic differences
10International Comparisons in CVD Morbidity and
Mortality
- CVD accounts for 25-45 of deaths among different
countries - CVD death rates (per 100,000) range from 1310 in
Russia to 201 in Japan (6.5 fold difference) in
men and from 581 in Russia to 84 in France
(7-fold difference) - USA ranks 16th for both men (413) and women (201)
11CHD Morbidity and Mortality in the USA
- In 1995, 960,000 in USA died from CVD, 42 of all
deaths, leading cause in men over age 45 and
women over age 65. - 58 million or 20 of population have some form of
CVD. - Half of CVD deaths due to CHD, 16 due to stroke.
- CHD deaths (per 100,000) greatest in New York
(180), least in New Mexico (82). California
ranks 28th (125). - Stroke deaths (per 100,000) greatest in South
Carolina (63), least in New York (31).
California ranks 27th (43). - Economic costs of CHD estimated at 274 billion
in 1998.
12Secular Trends in CHD and Stroke Mortality
- From 1985-1992, greatest annual decline (6-7) in
CHD seen in Israel among men and France among
women, USA intermediate (4), increases in Poland
and Romania. - Stroke death rates declined most in Australia,
Italy, and France (8-9), USA about 3.
131980-1996 Trends in Ischemic Heart Disease and
Stroke (source NCHS)
14Prevalences of Major CHD Risk Factors NHANES I
(1976-1980) and NHANES III (1988-1994) Males
15Prevalences of Major CHD Risk Factors NHANES I
(1976-1980) and NHANES III (1988-1994) Females
16Prevalences () of Major CHD Risk Factors
California, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance
System, 1996-1997
17Migrant Studies
- Ni-Hon-San Study showed Japanese living in Japan
to have the lowest cholesterol levels and lowest
rates of CHD, those living in Hawaii to have
intermediate rates for both, and those living in
San Francisco to have the highest cholesterol
levels and CHD incidence
18CHD Incidence 1940 vs. 2000 Age-Adjustment
Standards
- Because age is one of the strongest predictors of
CHD, it is an important confounder to consider
when making comparisons across groups (gender,
ethnic, geographic) - Official US statistics have used the 1940 age
distribution as the standard, but with more older
age adults, the 2000 standard is being used,
resulting in substantial increases in incidence,
nearly two-fold higher than when using the 1940
standard - CHD incidence 1995 about 375/100,000 using the
2000 standard, compared to 180/100,000 using the
1940 standard