Defining sexual orientation: Research on lesbian alcohol use as an illustration of the need for conc - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Defining sexual orientation: Research on lesbian alcohol use as an illustration of the need for conc

Description:

Handbook of Research with Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender Populations. ... 2.8% of men and 1.4% of women self-identify as lesbian, gay or bisexual ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:69
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: cheryl78
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Defining sexual orientation: Research on lesbian alcohol use as an illustration of the need for conc


1
Defining sexual orientation Research on lesbian
alcohol use as an illustration of the need for
conceptual clarity
  • Cheryl A. Parks, MSW, Ph.D.
  • University of Connecticut
  • June 23-24, 2005
  • Washington, DC.

Presentation is based on Parks, C. A., Hughes,
T.L. Werkmeister-Rozas, L. (in press). Defining
sexual identity and orientation in research with
lesbians and gay men. In J. Martin B. Meezan
(eds.) Handbook of Research with Gay, Lesbian,
Bisexual and Transgender Populations. Binghamton
NY Haworth Press.
2
Outline of Presentation
  • The problem
  • Its impact on research
  • Examples from lesbian alcohol use studies
  • Recommendations

3
Alternative Conceptualizations
  • Sexual orientation as a separate construct,
    distinct from sexual identity and behavior e.g.,
    a predisposition to experience sexual attraction
    or desire for persons of the same gender, the
    other gender, or both genders (Diamond, 2000)
  • versus
  • Sexual orientation as an overarching construct
    e.g., one comprised of cognitive (identity),
    behavioral, and affective (desire/attraction)
    dimensions (Laumann, Gagnon, Michael, Michaels,
    1994).

4
A Wealth of Terminology
lesbian
homoerotic
questioning
homosexual
MSM
queer
gay
WSW
transgendered
bisexual
LGB.. LGBT.. LGBTQ.. LGBTQQ ...
5
An Assortment of Different Measures
  • Self-identification as lesbian, gay, or bisexual
  • Reported same-gender behavior
  • Reported same-gender attraction, fantasy, or
    desire
  • Association with or involvement in social
    relationships or community groups that are
    identified as homosexual
  • Some combination of any of the above

6
Resulting in Different Population Estimates
Data based on 1992 National Health and Social
Life Survey (NHSLS Laumann, et al,1994)
  • 10.1 of men and 8.6 of women may be
    considered gay/lesbian or bisexual, depending on
    how sexual orientation is measured
  • 7.7 of men and 7.5 of women acknowledge any
    same-sex attraction or desire
  • 5.3 of men and 3.5 of women report any
    same-gender sexual behavior since age 18
  • 2.8 of men and 1.4 of women self-identify as
    lesbian, gay or bisexual

7
With only Limited Overlap Between Groups
Of those who acknowledge any same-sex desire,
behavior or identity
Behavior Only (17)
Attraction/Desire Only (51.5)
Behavior Desire (10)
Desire, behavior and identity (20.5)
Identity Only (0)
Attraction and identity (1)
8
So Why or Does It (Really) Matter?
9
Yes! Because
  • Although multiple terms seem to suggest a more
    nuanced understanding of sexual orientation and
    the people that are the focus of our research,
  • That research also reflects an enduring
    conceptual confusion about the nature or
    meaning of sexual orientation (Chung Katayama ,
    1996 Sell Petrulio,1996)
  • With often inadequate definitions and
    inconsistently applied measures appearing in
    published reports
  • Leading to concerns and criticism regarding the
    validity, comparability and generalizability of
    findings reported.

10
Thus, the challenge Who are we really studying?
  • Each dimension samples a different population
  • Identity and behavior may change (in response to
    social, cultural, and historical factors)
    attraction is less likely to do so (particularly
    among men)
  • Responses may vary depending on
  • Age at the time of interview
  • Birth cohort
  • Gender
  • Race/ethnicity
  • Time frame of interest (e.g., current vs.
    lifetime)

11
Examples Measures of Sexual Identity
  • Single item asking if respondent considers
    him/herself to be heterosexual, lesbian or gay,
    bisexual (McCabe et al, 2003 a probability
    sample of male and female college students)
  • How do you define your sexual identity? Only
    homosexual/lesbian/gay mostly bisexual mostly
    heterosexual only heterosexual other. (Parks
    Hughes, 2005 convenience sample of
    self-identified lesbian adults)
  • Which of the following statements best describe
    your sexual orientation? Heterosexual, that is
    straight, or prefer to have sex with people of
    the opposite sex Bisexual, that is, prefer to
    have sex with people of either sex Homosexual,
    that is gay or lesbian, or prefer to have sex
    with people of your own sex. (Drabble, et al 2005
    probability sample of U.S. adults)

12
Strengths/Limitations
  • Least prevalent yet most visible and accessible
  • At greatest risk for stressors associated with
    minority status
  • More access to sources of support and affiliation
  • Good source for focus on risk and protective
    factors, access to care, couple and family
    dynamics, other issues affected by social context
  • Limits access to people open or out enough to
    self-identify
  • Respondents are generally young, white,
    well-educated and middle class
  • Inadequate representation of older adults,
    racial/ethnic minorities and those who are not
    out

13
Example Measures of Same-sex Behavior
  • Specify the gender of any sexual partners within
    12 months preceding study labeled homosexually
    active if any same-gender partners were reported
    (Cochran et al, 2000 probability study of U.S.
    adults)
  • Ever had sex with another person? If yes, with
    men only, women only, or with both men and women.
    (Scheer, et al 2003 probability study of young
    women in CA)

14
Strengths /Limitations
  • Not as stigmatizing as identity may increase
    number of potential respondents
  • Most salient definition when investigating
    physical health issues rather than concerns
    related to minority stress
  • Behavioral terminology open to interpretation
  • Concordance with identity is less than 50
  • Cannot assume identification as LGB and findings
    cannot be compared directly with self-identified
    groups

15
Example Measures of Same-sex Attraction
  • How would you describe your sexual orientation?
    Heterosexual (sexually attracted only to the
    opposite sex), homosexual (sexually attracted
    only to your own sex) or bisexual (sexually
    attracted to both men and women).(Mays Cochran,
    2001 probability study of U.S. adults)
  • Which of the following best describes your
    feelings? Response set ranges from I am only
    attracted to boys/men (or girls/women) and I will
    only be sexual with boys/men (or girls/women) to
    mostly, equally, or not at all. (Noell Ochs,
    2001 non-probability sample of homeless
    adolescents)

16
Strengths/Limitations
  • Largest pool of potential respondents
  • Least stigmatizing dimension
  • May be best source for data on identity
    development processes, stressors encountered and
    coping strategies employed
  • Definitions within this dimension are highly
    variable, lack comparability
  • Very low concordance with identity (25) and
    behavior (31)
  • Influence on health and psychosocial outcomes may
    be weak

17
Lesbian Alcohol Research Outcomes
18
Recommendations
  • Provide explicit and consistent conceptual and
    operational definitions in all reported research
  • Be consistent in use of terminology, temporal
    periods, and response categories
  • Allow for confidential administration of
    measures
  • Report the measures used in referenced materials
  • Work for inclusion of sexual orientation
    measures in national studies
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com