Effects of 5% lactic acid application on Enterobacteriaceae levels and prevalence of Salmonella thro - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Effects of 5% lactic acid application on Enterobacteriaceae levels and prevalence of Salmonella thro

Description:

P. Bass, K. Belk, J. Scanga, J. Sofos, G. Smith. Colorado State ... 4 x 8 cm sterile specimen sponge (Bio Pro) Hydrated with 10 mL of 0.1% peptone buffer ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:172
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: phil1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Effects of 5% lactic acid application on Enterobacteriaceae levels and prevalence of Salmonella thro


1
Effects of 5 lactic acid application on
Enterobacteriaceae levels and prevalence of
Salmonella through a low-temperature
edible-rendering process
  • P. Bass, K. Belk, J. Scanga, J. Sofos, G. Smith
  • Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO

2
Beef Fat Trimmings
  • Majority of cattle in the US are fed beef
  • 590 kg (1300 lb) live wt., YG 2.9, FT 1.22cm
    (0.48 in)
  • 375 kg (826 lb) carcass
  • 28.6 kg (63 lb) fat trimmings
  • Beef fat processed into
  • Inedible tallow
  • Mixed with lean for ground products
  • Finely textured beef

Carcass Estimates CSU Beef Cutout Calculator
3
Finely Textured Beef (FTB)
  • Recovered lean muscle tissue from beef fat
    trimmings
  • Fat content
  • Used in formulating
  • Sausages
  • Restructured processed meats
  • Ground beef
  • Recovered via low-temperature edible rendering

Image Source http//www.meatsafety.org/safehandli
ng/groundbeef2.jpg
4
Low-temperature Edible Rendering
Steam
(30-50C)
Heat Treatment
Pump 1
Separation 1
Solids
Liquid
Separation 2
Serum
Tallow
Pump 2
Pelleter
FTB
5
Objectives
  • Analyze the effectiveness of a 5 lactic acid
    (LA) solution application on surface
    Enterobacteriaceae (EB) survival and Salmonella
    (SAL) prevalence on beef trimmings passing
    through an on-line spray wash cabinet
  • Analyze the effectiveness of a 5 LA solution
    application on EB survival and SAL prevalence at
    differing phases of the commercial operation of a
    low-temperature edible rendering process.

6
Treatments
  • Day 1 Control
  • Day 2 Spray wash cabinet
  • 5 LA, 1.4 Bars, 50C, 6 s
  • Day 3 LA spray at grinder
  • 5 LA, 1.4 Bars, 50C
  • Day4 LA spray immediately prior to pelleting
  • 5 LA, 1.4 Bars, 50C
  • Day 5 LA spray at grinder and immediately prior
    to pelleting
  • 5 LA, 1.4 Bars, 50C

7
Spray Wash Cabinet
  • 1.4 Bars, 50C, 6 s

Manufacturer CHAD Company
8
Spray Wash Cabinet
  • 7 rows of spray line 2 nozzles (top), 5 nozzles
    (bottom)

Schematics CHAD Company
9
Spray Cabinet
Steam
(30-50C)
Heat Treatment
Separation 1
Solids
Liquid
Pump 1
Sampling Points -Grinder -Heat Treatment -Liquid -
Solid -Tallow -Serum -FTB
Separation 2
Serum
Tallow
Pump 2
Pelleter
FTB
10
Sampling Procedure (Spray Cabinet)
  • Samples were taken immediately prior to and
    immediately after the spray wash cabinet from
    whole pieces of beef fat trimmings
  • 4 x 8 cm sterile specimen sponge (Bio Pro)
  • Hydrated with 10 mL of 0.1 peptone buffer
  • 100 cm2 area of subcutaneous fat surface
  • 10 passes horizontally, 10 passes vertically
    (Stopforth et al., 2006)
  • Sampled every 30 min of production time on Day 2

11
Sampling Procedure (Low Temp)
  • Samples taken every hour of production
  • Grinder sterile plastic gloves
  • Other steps stainless steel ladle, sanitized
    with 70 ethanol solution
  • Samples placed in 15.25 x 22.85 cm sterile
    Whirl-pak bags
  • Placed in refrigeration
  • Shipped overnight

12
Sampling Procedure
  • Warren Analytical Laboratories, Greeley, CO
  • SAL
  • Enriched in TSB for 12 h with agitation at 37C
  • multiplex PCR screening (Stopforth et al., 2006)
  • EB3M Petrifilm Enterobacteriaceae Count Plate
  • 1 mL aliquot
  • Incubated at 35C for 24 2 h
  • EB colony red colony, gas bubbles, light-yellow
    halo

Image Source 3M Petrifilm Enterobacteriaceae
Plate Count Interpretation Guide
13
Statistical Analysis
  • EB analyzed in PROC GLM, SAS
  • Significant at P
  • SAL prevalence analyzed in PROC FREQ, SAS
  • Fishers Exact Test
  • Significant at P

14
Spray Wash Cabinet EB Results
a,bDifferences within columns, lacking a common
superscript, differ (P 15
EB Results
a,b,cDifferences within columns, lacking a common
superscript, differ (P 16
SAL Prevalence
x,yDifferences within columns, lacking a common
superscript, differ (P 17
Summary
  • Reduction in EB counts when LA was applied at
    spray wash cabinet
  • Reduction in EB counts when LA was applied at any
    stage of the process compared to control
  • Significant reduction in SAL prevalence on Day 4
    vs Day 1 at the liquid step
  • LA did present some color issues in the FTB
  • Findings support the potential for LA application
    to lean beef trimmings for the control of EB and
    SAL
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com