Civil Procedure Trial - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Civil Procedure Trial

Description:

FRCP Rule 38 right to trial by jury is 'preserved' under the 7th ... Kircher v. Atchison can this be reconciled with Denman? Civil Procedure II - Trial ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:234
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: merc163
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Civil Procedure Trial


1
Civil Procedure - Trial
  • Professor Marc H. Greenberg

2
Civil Procedure II - Trial
  • FRCP Rule 38 right to trial by jury is
    preserved under the 7th Amendment, not granted.
  • Demand for jury trial must be made, for cases
    triable by a jury or the right is waived
  • FRCP Rule 39(b) cases not deemed triable by
    jury are tried by the court but the Court has
    the discretion to order a trial by jury as well
  • Read Justice Burgers list of problems associated
    with jury trials do you agree with his
    assessment? Should we do away with a jury?

3
Civil Procedure II - Trial
  • Trial by jury was, historically, limited to
    matters of law. Matters of equity, requiring the
    discretion of a court were triable only by the
    Court.
  • Beacon Theatres v. Westover
  • What is mandamus to the Court?
  • When claims in a case sound in both equity and
    law, is a jury allowed? Should the Court try the
    equity issues, and then a jury try the legal
    ones? The Court here notes that the revised
    Federal Rules allow a single trial of all of the
    issues, equitable as well as legal. The dissent
    worries that this gives too much power to one of
    the litigants to force the case into a jury trial
    by adding a legal counter-claim? True?

4
Civil Procedure II - Trial
  • Dairy Queen v. Wood the Court rejects a
    determination that a case may not be tried by a
    jury based on the words used to describe the
    action, noting that the nature of the claim is
    what is determinative note also the Courts
    discussion of the complexity argument, and the
    suggestion that Special Masters can help
    alleviate that problem
  • Katchen v. Landy The 7th Amendment doesnt bar
    Congress, in creating administrative agency
    dispute resolution systems, from barring a trial
    by jury here based on the equitable nature of
    bankruptcy

5
Civil Procedure II - Trial
  • Ross v. Bernhard where the right of a
    stockholder to sue raises an issue in equity,
    does this preclude a trial by jury of the
    underlying derivative rights suit? No, says the
    Court, the right to trial by jury isnt forfeited
    where the underlying claim is one of law the
    equitable claim can also be tried to a jury
  • Are the measures described as means to address
    the complexity exception adequate?
  • In Re Japanese Electronic if the jury cannot
    understand the evidence and the relevant legal
    rules, isnt an erroneous decision likely?

6
Civil Procedure II - Trial
  • Curtis v. Loether Does the 7th Amendment apply
    to a newly-established Court-based form of
    relief, such as the Civil Rights Act of 1968?
  • Does the fact that proceedings under the Act are
    not administrative proceedings affect the result?
    Should it?
  • Atlas Roofing v. OSHRC note the rationale used
    by the Court to justify the lack of a jury right
    here the public rights doctrine
  • Granfinaciera v. Nordberg applying the public
    rights doctrine to bankruptcy proceedings, but
    finding that a fraudulent conveyance claim is a
    private action, for which a jury can be used.

7
Civil Procedure II - Trial
  • Chauffeurs v. Terry note that there are two
    claims here one against the employer for
    backpay, and one against the union for breach of
    the duty of fair representation is that
    important?
  • Note the problem of trying to find 18th century
    analogies is Justice Brennan right is it time
    to stop rattling through dusty attics of ancient
    writs?
  • Is the dissent right having determined that
    this is a suit in equity, should that be the end
    of discussion?
  • Peremptory Challenges Edmonson v. Leesville
  • The point of peremptory challenges is that they
    need not be based on cause. Can they be based on
    a bias? Does Justice OConnors dissent make a
    valid point? Or should these challenges be
    eliminated?

8
Civil Procedure II - Trial
  • Order of Trial
  • Burden of Proof
  • Burden of Production
  • Burden of Persuasion whats the difference?
  • Opening Statements
  • Presenting Evidence
  • Admissibility
  • Technique of Presentation
  • The Role of the Trial Judge
  • Closing Argument whats proper?

9
Civil Procedure II - Trial
  • FRCP Rule 50 Motions for Judgement as a Matter
    of Law
  • The 1991 Amendment
  • Galloway v. U.S. Neely v. Martin Rule 50
    doesnt violate the 7th Amendment
  • Grounds for Granting a Rule 50 Motion
  • Denman v. Spain is this decision based on the
    facts of the case, or on an emotional response?
    How should cases like this be handled?
  • Kircher v. Atchison can this be reconciled with
    Denman?

10
Civil Procedure II - Trial
  • Rogers v. Missouri Pacific if any valid reason
    exists to support the jurys decision, the Court
    should not overrule that decision.
  • Hartwig v. Kanner conversely, a directed
    verdict is appropriate where no evidence to
    support a contrary verdict is presented, and
    appellant cannot show a different result would
    have followed had Hartwig done a better job on
    the stand.

11
Civil Procedure II - Trial
  • Challenging Errors New Trial FRCP Rules 59
    61
  • Note the Minnesota rules grounds
  • Note the difference between harmless error and
    error that would significantly affect the outcome
    at trial
  • Consider the strategic issues behind the decision
    to seek a new trial
  • Incoherent Jury Verdicts Magnani v. Trogi, Robb
    v. Hickey

12
Civil Procedure II - Trial
  • Kramer v. Kister notable because it lets us
    understand that juries have it good today no
    longer are they deprived of food, drink, fire or
    light, nor can they be carried round the
    circuit, from town to town, in a cart!
  • Sequestering juries pro and con.
  • Jury misconduct affidavits may now be used to
    prove their misconduct
  • Hukle v. Kimble is there really anything wrong
    with a quotient verdict?
  • Should any one involved in the case be able to
    communicate with jurors, in any way?

13
Civil Procedure II - Trial
  • New trial because the verdict is against the
    weight of the evidence
  • Aetna v. Yeatts, Marsh v. Illinois, Dyer v.
    MacDougall, Bowditch v. Boston, Dyer v. Hastings,
    In re Greens Estate.

14
Civil Procedure II - Trial
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com