Credit Rating Agencies and their Regulation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Credit Rating Agencies and their Regulation

Description:

1860 Henry Varnum Poor's History of Railroads and Canals in the United States, ... DBRS, Egan-Jones Rating Company, Fitch, Japan Credit Rating Agency, Moody's ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1165
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: University383
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Credit Rating Agencies and their Regulation


1
Credit Rating Agencies and their Regulation
  • Viktoria Baklanova, CFA
  • PhD candidate
  • School of Law
  • LLM Corporate Finance Law
  • Residential Weekend 16-18th October 2009

2
  • Agenda
  • History
  • Mission
  • Rating scale
  • Rating types and rating process
  • CRA regulation in the U.S.
  • CRA regulation outside of the U.S.
  • Future of CRAs

3
  • History
  • 1860 Henry Varnum Poor's History of Railroads
    and Canals in the United States, a precursor of
    modern stock reporting and analysis
  • 1900 John Moody Company published Moody's
    Manual of Industrial and Miscellaneous
    Securities
  • 1906 Luther Lee Blake formed Standard
    Statistics Bureau
  • 1909 John Moodys started using letter symbols
    to express his conclusions
  • 1913 John Knowles Fitch registered Fitch
    Publishing Company, which published Fitch Bond
    Book ? Fitch Stock and Bond Manual
  • 1914 Moody's Investors Service incorporated
  • 1941 Poor's Publishing and Standard Statistics
    merged to form Standard Poor's Corporation
  • 2008 10 companies are officially recognized as
    Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating
    Organizations (NRSRO) Realpoint LLC, LACE
    Financial Corp, A.M. Best Company, DBRS,
    Egan-Jones Rating Company, Fitch, Japan Credit
    Rating Agency, Moodys Investors Service, Rating
    and Investment Information, Standard Poors
    Ratings Services.

4
Mission
  • Creation of stable, transparent and integrated
    financial markets
  • Characteristics of Credit
  • Ratings
  • Independent
  • Forward-looking
  • Stable
  • Easy to understand
  • Broad coverage.

5
Rating Scale Investment grade
6
Rating scale Speculative grade
7
Rating types
  • International/National AAA, AAA(CHIN)
  • Long-term/Short-term
  • Fitch F1/F1, F2, F3, B, C, D
  • Moodys Prime-1, Prime-2, Prime-3, Non-Prime
    (NP)
  • SP A-1/A-1, A-2, A-3, B (B-1, B-2, B-3), C,
    R, SD, D
  • Credit rating by sector corporate, municipal,
    sovereign, structured finance
  • Non-credit ratings
  • Fitch Recovery Rating (RR), Asset Manager
    Rating (AM)
  • Moodys Market Risk Rating (MR), Servicer
    Quality Rating (SQ)
  • SP Fund Volatility Rating (S), Stability Rating
    (SR)

8
Credit rating process
9
CRA regulation in the U.S.
  • 1909 1975 unregulated.
  • 1975 The U.S. SEC started using credit ratings
    to determine capital charges for broker-dealers
    (Rule 15c3-1 under the Exchange Act). The term
    "NRSRO" was used to designate credit rating
    agencies whose ratings would be eligible.
  • 1994 1997 SEC solicited comments the
    appropriate role of credit ratings in rules under
    the federal securities laws, and the need to
    establish formal procedures for recognizing and
    monitoring the activities of NRSROs. Comments
    received by the Commission led to a rule proposal
    in 1997. However, the Commission has not acted
    upon that rule proposal.
  • 2002 the SEC submitted to Congress its Report on
    the role of credit rating agencies in the
    operation of the securities markets in response
    to the the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

10
CRA regulation in the U.S. (cont.)
  • 2006 Credit Rating Agency Reform Act of 2006
  • Formalize NRSRO designation
  • Establish NRSRO oversight
  • Promote competition
  • June 2007 Oversight of Credit Rating Agencies
    Registered as Nationally Recognized Statistical
    Rating Organizations
  • Aug 2007 C R E D I T C R I S I S
  • June 2008 Proposed Rules for Nationally
    Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations
  • Enhance integrity of rating process
  • Structured finance rating symbology
  • Feb 2009 Final Rule Amendments to Rules for
    Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating
    Organizations
  • Increase transparency of methodologies,
    disclosure of rating performance
  • Manage conflicts of interest

11
CRA regulation outside of the U.S.
  • 2003 the International Organization of
    Securities Commissions Technical Committee
    published a Statement of Principles Regarding the
    Activities of Credit Rating Agencies
  • Improve investor protection
  • Improve fairness, efficiency and transparency of
    securities markets
  • Reduce systemic risk
  • 2004 IOSCOs The Technical Committee issued a
    12-page document Code of Conduct Fundamentals
    for Credit Rating Agencies
  • 2004 the European Parliament identified issues
    of concerns
  • The quality of the ratings
  • The agencies' independence and objectivity
  • Transparent credit rating methods
  • A high degree of concentration in credit rating
    activities and its possible anticompetitive
    effects
  • 2006 IOSCO reported back to the EU Parliament no
    further regulation is needed.

11
12
CRA regulation outside of the U.S. (cont.)
  • May 2008 6-page document Changes to Code of
    Conduct for Credit Rating Agencies
  • Quality and integrity of the rating process
  • CRA independence and avoidance of conflicts of
    interest
  • CRA Responsibilities to the Investing Public and
    Issuers
  • Disclosure of the Code of Conduct and
    Communications with Market Participants
  • April 2009 the European Parliament approved a
    43-page document an initial proposal of
    Regulation of the European Parliament and of the
    Council on Credit Rating Agencies
  • to ensure that credit rating agencies avoid
    conflicts of interest in the rating process or at
    least manage them adequately
  • to improve the quality of the methodologies and
    the quality of ratings
  • to increase transparency by setting disclosure
    obligations
  • to ensure an efficient registration and
    surveillance framework, avoiding forum shopping
    and regulatory arbitrage between EU
    jurisdictions.

12
13
Future of CRAs
  • Should credit rating agencies be held liable for
    the rating performance?
  • Yes____________
  • No____________

Information assymetry
13
14
Contact information
  • v.baklanova_at_my.westminster.ac.uk
  • Papers
  • Regulatory Use of Credit Ratings How It Impacts
    the Behavior of Market Constituents
  • http//papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id
    1378627
  • http//westminster.academia.edu/ViktoriaBaklanova/
    Papers

14
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com