Title: Malaria diagnosis: Moving from a mess to an ordered programme to a tool for elimination The AllParty
1Malaria diagnosis Moving from a mess to an
ordered programme to a tool for
eliminationThe All-Party Parliamentary Group
on Malaria and Neglected Tropical Diseases
(APPMG)
2Malaria Diagnosis, WHO 2009
- Prompt parasitological confirmation by microscopy
or alternatively by RDTs is recommended in all
patients suspected of malaria before treatment is
started. - Treatment solely on the basis of clinical
suspicion should only be considered when a
parasitological diagnosis is not accessible.
3Confirmation of diagnosis
- confirmation of parasitaemia in suspected
malaria cases
World Malaria Report 2008
4Magnitude of over-diagnosis /over-treatment
Systematic review 24 studies conducted
between 1989 and 2005 in 15 different African
countries including 15331 patients Proportion
of malaria among fevers highly variable 2 to
81 MEDIAN PR 26
Before 2000 MEDIAN PR 36 From 2000-2005
MEDIAN PR 19
Courtesy of V. DAcremont, C. Lengeler, B.
Genton, Philadelphia, November 2007
5Changing case managementManagement of febrile
illness
Febrile patient
Anti-malarial medicine
RDT / microscopy
20
80
Malaria
Non-malaria
Severe symptoms
Not severe
Anti-malarial medicine
Manage in community ? review ? Antibiotics ? Other
Refer
6Can we ignore non-malarial fever?
High mortality among patients admitted to
hospital and incorrectly treated for malaria, 10
hospitals, NE Tanzania
Reyburn H et al. BMJ 2006
7RDT impact, Zambia
ACT
Source NMCC, Zambia MoH
8Senegal RDT implementation ( of RDT use by month
in 2007 - 2008)
Courtesy Babacar Faye and Senegal MoH
9Senegal Parasite prevalence of malaria-like fever
cases
RDT introduction
Courtesy Babacar Faye and Senegal MoH
10Weekly Malaria Lab. Tests, 2008, Kabale District
Uganda Saving costs by treating only lab
confirmed case!
Uganda, RDT implementation
Courtesy Uganda MoH, Uganda WHO office
11Scale up of RDTs and ACTs in India
Millions of kits/doses
12Challenges to implementing comprehensive
RDT-based diagnosis
- Sensitivity e.g. 20 to 99 in published studies
- Stability
- Recommended storage temperature often
inappropriate for rural health clinic in tropics
(e.g. lt35C) - User safety
- Blood safety (gloves, sharps disposal, HIV risk)
- Programmatic
- Managing negative results (non-malaria fever
patients) - Logistics
- Monitoring
13Building a structured diagnostics programme
Should be integrated where possible with
laboratory services for other diseases
14Selecting RDTs for procurement.WHO Product
Testing Round 1 2008-9
ALL 60 Manufacturers 200 products
ISO134852003 35 Manufacturers 112 products
Evaluated 2008 21 Manufacturers 41 products
15Selecting RDTs for procurement WHO Product
Testing 2008-9 Performance against 200 para/µL
samples
www.wpro.who.int/sites/rdt
16WHO-FIND Laboratory network
Lot Testing
Collection and testing site
Specimen characterization
Global specimen bank
Regional lot-testing site
HTD
CDC
DMR
UCAD
UL
IPB
RITM
IPC
EHNRI
CIDEIM
KEMRI
IHRDC
IMT
IPM
AMI
- Why lot-test?
- Lot-lot variation noted in most products
- Ensure no damage during transport to country
- Need to convince clinicians / users / regulatory
authorities that tests are working
2006 41 lots 2007 81 lots 2008 167 lots
(?15 of public sector procurement)
17Innovative planning, infrastructure and training
SMS-based disease and stock reporting
Productive collaborations
Programme management
Standardized job-aids and training
Logistics manuals
18Courtesy Malaria Consortium
19Minimum standard for funding a programme?
Transport and storage
Training, drugs / supplies for non-malarial fever
Community education
- To have an impact, we need to
- Build programmes, not just fund procurement
- Develop sustainable methods and in-country
capacity
Training and supervision
Monitoring accuracy in field
Lot-testing and laboratory monitoring
Procurement of gloves, sharps disposal containers
etc
Procurement of RDTs
20In the pipeline 2010-2011Country based
lot-testing, clinic-based QC testing
- Recombinant antigen-based testing panels for
RDTs - Moving control of quality control to national
programmes, and health workers, in endemic
countries - Harmonizing standards and RDT detection
thresholds between developers, manufacturers and
users
21Towards elimination Detection of P. falciparum
reservoir
Parasite density
HRP2 concentration
Average field microscopy
Good RDT
Expert microscopy
PCR
fever
months
Sampling visibility
22LAMP Moving molecular diagnosis from London to
Livingstone
Population screening and LAMP
In areas with low-transmission, a large
proportion of patients with malaria are likely to
have less than the 100 p/ml detected by RDTs.
Development underway of Loop-mediated isothermal
DNA amplification (LAMP) that detects 1-6
parasites /?l with minimal sample processing that
requires no sophisticated equipment and can be
read with the naked eye (FIND, HTD London, Eiken).
Primers amplifying Plasmodium mitochondrial DNA
23Potential for high through-put LAMP-based
screening
24Accurate diagnosis at community level Effort
and outcomes
25Acknowledgements
- WHO
- FIND
- HTD, UK
- RITM, Philippines
- IP, Cambodia
- US CDC
- AMI, Australia
- MSF
- DMR, Myanmar
- IP, Madagascar
- IP, Central African Republic
- IHDRC, Tanzania
- KEMRI, Kenya
- EHNRI, Ethiopia
- Uni Lagos, Nigeria
- UCAD, Senegal
- CIDEIM, Colombia
- IMT, Peru
- Zambia NMCC
26Addressing microscopy performance
27Introduction of a slide validation programme
(MSF, Sudan)
Addressing microscopy performance
Courtesy MSF, Holland
28Addressing microscopy performance
Asian accreditation network (WHO-ACTMalaria-AMI)
Africa Similar programmes at KEMRI, under
development through IMaD, Uni Lagos, elsewhere