Title: Pension Reform in the Nordic Countries: What Can Other EU Member States Learn
1Pension Reform in the Nordic CountriesWhat Can
Other EU Member States Learn?
- The Cicero Foundation
- Paris, 15-16 May 2008
- Mika Vidlund
2Structure of the presentation
- The changing demographics in the Nordic countries
- Common features for Nordic pension schemes
- Recent pension reforms
- Concluding remarks
3The change in old-age dependency ratio
(65/15-64) in the EU countries
Source Eurostat 2005
4The change in old-age dependency ratio
(65/15-64) and the situation in 2050
EU-25 average Source Eurostat
5Old-age dependency ratios in Norway and Finland,
1950-2060
Source Statistics Norway Statistics Finland
6Public pension expenditure as a share of GDP
between 2004 and 2050
Source EPC/AWG-calculations (2006)
7Public pension expenditure in the EU-25 countries
in 2004 and in 2050, of GDP
EU-25 average
Source EPC/AWG-calculations 2006
8(No Transcript)
9DK
SE
FI
10- Allianz 2007 Reform Pressure Gauge
FI 13th
SE 11th
DK 9th
NO 8th
11Common features for Nordic Pension Systems
- Universal basic security
- - guarantee pension in FI, SE and NO (in 2010)
- - basic pension model in DK
- Comprehensive earnings-related pension scheme
- - with the exception of DK
- - in DK and IS earnings-related pensions through
occupational schemes - - in FI no pension or wage ceiling
- Low income inequality and poverty in old-age
-
- Prefunding of pensions
- Since the establishment of employment pensions
FI, SE, DK, IS - Norway The origin of the Government Pension Fund
can be traced back to 1990 when the Government
Petroleum Fund was formally established
12Value of pension assets in the EU countries in
2004, per cent of GDP
Source AWG (2006) EFRP 2005 OECD 2005
13The Government Pension Fund and accrued old age
pension liabilities, per cent of mainland GDP
2005 - 2060
Net interest rate 2 per cent with real annual
growth rate in earnings 2 per cent and real rate
of return 4 per cent Source Norwegian Ministry
of Finance
14Different Designs Recent Pension Reforms
- Countries are similar in many respects, but they
differ when it comes to their pension design and
the political making of the pensions - The Swedish reform in the late 1990s was big
bang where everything was changed, the Finns
build on piecemeal reforms that gradually changed
the whole system, while on the surface, the
Danish story is about stability and status quo.
(Three routes to a pension reform (to be
published by Kangas, O. Lundberg, U. Ploug, N.)
15Different Designs Swedish Pension Reform
- The reform emanated from Parliament, and interest
organizations were excluded from the planning. - Path-breaking reform changing the logics of the
system - Time schedule
-
- 1984-1990 Pension Commission
- 1991-1994 Working Group on Pensions
- 1994 New System approved in Parliament
- 1998 Final Legislation approved
- 1999 New system comes into force
- 2003 New system fully implemented
- Transitional rules for those born in 1938-1953
16Different Designs Finnish pension reform
- Tripartite Politicians virtually watch the
process from the sideline - Gradual and piecemeal reforms - working group
negotiating to reform pensions. All major trade
unions and employer federations were represented
in the group, while there was no political
representation thus the Finnish procedure has
been opposite to that pursued in Sweden. - Towards pension reform 2005
- Kickoff Deep economic crisis in the early 1990s
- - Unemployment rate reached almost 17 per cent
in 1994 and GDP fell from 1990 to 1993 almost 11
per cent - Smaller reforms throughout the 1990s
- - E.g. employees pension contribution
introduced in 1993. - Earnings-related pension reform in 1996
- - The calculation base for pensionable wage was
gradually changed to the ten last years of each
employment contract (previously 2 out of last 4
years) - - Pensions paid to persons aged over 65 were
revalued by a new index, in which consumer prices
have a weighting of 80 per cent and wages a
weighting of 20 per cent (previously 50/50) - - The national pension was made proportional to
the earnings-related pension
17Different Designs Finnish pension reform
Pension reform 2005
- Negotiations started at the end of 1990s
- - Pension agreements among the labour market
parties on 12 November 2001 and 5 September 2002 - - In November 2002, the Government submitted the
bill to Parliament. - - Parliament approved a pension reform package
on 18 February 2003 - Main changes
- - Flexible retirement age between the ages 63-68
- - Linking benefits to life-expectancy from 2010
onwards - - Basing benefits on life-time earnings
- - Restricting access to early retirement
- - Increasing the accrual rate within the window
of retirement - - Changing indexation rules
- - Redefining and extending accrual for
non-working periods
18Employment rate of people aged 55 to 64 ( of
population) in the Nordic countries
Source OECD
19- Sweden
- DC-old age pension system 16
(NDC) 2,5 (DC) - Flexible retirement age 61 ?
- Automatic pension adjustment Balance ratio
1.0149 (2006). - Invalidity pension from sickness insurance
- Compulsory occupational pensions ( 90)
- Administration www.fk.se, www.ppm.nu, www.ap1.se
(ap 1st 4th, ap6th and ap7th) - Finland
- No pension or wage ceiling
- ? Occupational pensions are rare
- Pension accrual rates 1.5 (aged 18-52), 1.9
(aged 53-62) and 4.5 (aged 63-68) - Flexible retirement age 63-68 (early retirement
at the age of 62) - Administration dezentralised (see e.g. www.etk.fi)
20Different Designs Norwegian pension reform 2010
21- Norway
- Current old-age pension scheme
- Retirement age 67
- No statutory early retirement
- Special early retirement pension (AFP) from the
age of 62 - Occupational pensions compulsory since 2006
- Administration www.nav.no
- Pension reform 2010
- Reform Commission was set up on 30 March 2001
- Governments 1st White Paper on 10 December 2004
Parliament accepted main principles for a
reform on 26 May 2005 - 2nd White Paper in October 2006 Parliaments
agreement on 23 April 2007 - Government bill for consultation on 28 January
2008 -
22The main changes to the Norwegian pension system
23Different Designs Denmark and Iceland
- Denmark a lack of income-related statutory
pensions - the demand for earnings-relatedness
bifurcated into private occupational and
individual pension programs. As the generous
national pension scheme has become increasingly
income-tested, the occupational schemes are
eventually becoming the most important part of
the overall pension design - Iceland stability - development on pension funds
and on voluntary savings
24- Denmark
- No earnings-related statutory pension
- SP-scheme 1 of wage (suspension of
contributions 2004-2008) - Retirement age 67? 65? 67v...
- Occupational pension coverage over 80
- Administration municipalities (national
pension) ATP ja SP www.atp.dk -
- Iceland
- Earnings-related pension arranged in separate
funds together with occupational pensions
benefits may vary - Retirement age 67
- Administration national pension www.tr.is
Pension funds www.ll.is (Icelandic Pension Funds
Association, IPFA).
1.1.2007
25Pension Reform in the Nordic CountriesWhat Can
Other EU Member States Learn?
- Nordic way to financially stable pension system
technical solutions to meet the changing
demographics - - Automatic adjustments e.g. pensions affected
by life-expectancy - - Flexible retirement
- - Prefunding
- - etc.
- Incentives for later retirement
- - Tight connection between earnings and benefits
- - Pension policy is not enough
-
- Hybrid pension plans between DC and DB
- Inclusive pension coverage
- - Easier to renew than pension systems
representing Continental welfare states - less
pieces in puzzle - Broad consensus and political support
- - Piecemeal reforms in Finland vs. path-breaking
reform in Sweden similar results in the end? - Nordic cooperation
26Finally, main lesson and a real challenge...
27Thank you for your attention
- For more information
- www.etk.fi
- mika.vidlund_at_etk.fi