Title: Does eGovernment Reduce Corruption Findings from Eight Indian Projects
1Does eGovernment Reduce Corruption?Findings
from Eight Indian Projects
- Subhash Bhatnagar
- subhash_at_iimahd.ernet.in
2Corruption in India A story of Despair Hope
In the series of in-depth reports and analyses
we published in the first phase of our India
Poised initiative, the collapse of governance
consistently came through as the most serious
deterrent to a better quality of life. Times of
India
India fares abysmally on the global corruption
meter 20 believe government does not fight
corruption at all 39 think its fight against
corruption is ineffective and 15 say that far
from fighting corruption, government actually
encourages it. Transparency International
Corruption has shown a declining trend While 28
per cent of citizens participated in the survey
admitted that they have dealt through middlemen,
a sharp decline from 48 per cent in 2000, 30 per
cent admitted of giving bribe, which was 51 per
cent in 2000. Survey by Centre for Media
Studies, which covered eight major public utility
services
3Consequences of Administrative Corruption
- Largest cost is borne by the poor
- Raises cost of doing business for SMEs by 20
- Irritant to investors, impedes FDI flows
- Loss of revenue to Government
- Disincentive to honest employees, citizens
- Citizens feel that corruption is largest hurdle
in Indias progress. Increasing tolerance for
corruption. - Petty corruption opportunities - larger
corruption in appointments, transfers used to
collect funds for politicians
4Types of Corruption in Government-to-Citizen
Contact
- Administrative corruption
- Service is denied or delayed unless bribe is paid
- Collusion (both parties gain at the expense of
Government) - Favored allocation when mismatch between supply
and demand - Lower valuation by Tax collection agencies
- Waiving of penalties and fines
- Tempering government records to provide unfair
advantage - Extortion
- Law enforcers, tax collectors make blatantly
unreasonable demands to extort a bribe
5Measuring eGovernment Impact on Corruption
- Studies attempted to measure impact on corruption
(GKSP-4 projects in 2001MIT/IITB ethnographic
study in 2004 World Bank/IIMA/DIT in 2006) - Results from different studies, same project over
time have been inconclusive on impact on
corruption - Impact reported is from an assessment of 8 mature
projects in India through a systematic client
survey in the World Bank/DIT/IIMA study.
6Projects Which Were Assessed
- Issue of land titles in Karnataka (Bhoomi) 180
Kiosks, Launched February 2001 2-01 - Property registration in Karnataka (Kaveri) 230
offices 3-03 - Computerized Treasury (Khajane) 240 locations
11-02 - Property Registration in Andhra Pradesh AP 400
offices. 11-98 - eSeva center in Andhra Pradesh 250 locations in
190 towns, Used monthly by 3.5 million citizens
8-01 - e-Procurement in Andhra Pradesh 1-03
- Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (AMC) 16 Civic
Service Centers 9-02 - Inter State Check Posts in Gujarat 10 locations
3-2000
7Measurement Framework Used
Stakeholders
Key Dimension of Impact
8Methodology of Assessment
- Market Research agency used to administer survey
instrument to users who had experienced delivery
of computerized and manual services - Sample size - 240 respondents per project (30
randomly selected respondents from each of 8
service delivery points). - 8 locations chosen from 200-300 delivery points
on the basis of activity levels and development
index of catchment. - Impact measured as difference between respondent
ratings of computerized and manual systems.
9Governance Issues Are Important
10Proportion Paying Bribes (As a )
11Amount of Bribes Paid
12Overall Improvements Are Correlated with
Corruption
13Egovernment-How does it Help?
- Introduces transparency in data,
decisions/actions, rules, procedures, performance
of Govt. agencies - Automates processes to remove discretion
- Simplification of rules and reengineering
processes - Makes decisions traceable- tracks actions
- Introduces competition amongst delivery channels
and departments - Standardized documentation of comments/
objections leads to effective supervision-
through comparative indicators - Builds accountability- greater access to info
through web publishing-role of civil society - Provides documentation for citizens to follow up
- Centralizes data for better audit and analysis.
Integration of data across applications-provides
improved intelligence. Enables unbiased sampling
for audit purposes
14Administrative Corruption Some Issues that Need
to be Fixed
- Large variation across projects, centers of
projects. - Projects that automated processes have no impact.
Projects that focused on corruption and
reengineered processes did well. - Not enough political support to the corruption
agenda - Long history of collusion between corrupt civil
servants and resourced citizens creates
resistance. - Lack of supervision in remote areas - problems of
decentralization - Large power distance between civil servants and
citizens-afraid to assert and complain - Poor mechanisms of complaint handling.
Documentation is weak for investigation - Weak investigation, slow judicial system - small
chance of punishment