Title: Regulators Session I Convergence from the Regulators Perspective
1Regulators Session I Convergence from the
Regulators Perspective
Annegret Groebel, BNetzAManaging Director
Istanbul, 11 June 2009
2Convergence is (becoming) a reality
3Growth of Demand and Volume of Traffic
4Until 2002 separate networksand separate
regulatory rules
Voice telephony Fixed Mobile
Telephone/ Handset
Data Fixed PC
Broadcasting Cable Satellite Terrestrial Tele
vision
Service
Network
Terminal
5Which regulatory rules and competences in a
convergent world?
Data Fixed PC
Broadcasting Cable Satellite Terrestrial Tele
vision
Voice telephony Fixed Mobile
Telephone/Handset
Service
NGN
Network
Terminal
Convergence is one of the driving forces to
create the ECNS framework covering all types of
electronic networks and services
6Electronic communications networks and services
- Scope
Content Services - outside scope of new
framework(e.g. broadcast content, e-commerce
services)
Communications services (e.g. telephone, fax,
e-mail)
Communications networks (fixed, mobile,
satellite, cable TV, powerline systems, networks
used for radio and television broadcasting) and
associated facilities (e.g. CAS, APIs, EPGs)
7Regulatory principles and objectives
- Competition as a means to create economic welfare
and in particular consumer benefit (lower prices,
better quality and more choice) - Regulation as a means to promote sustainable
competition via opening markets in network
industries and creating a level playing field - Network industries are characterised by market
entry barriers resulting from substantial
economies of scale and scope - 2002 ECNS Framework based on regulation of the
relevant market susceptible to ex-ante regulation
(asymmetric regulation of SMP operators) - Review of the Framework proposals of Commission
publ. 13/11/07 - Realize Lisbon strategy goals increase broadband
penetration with NGA (fibre) investment to become
a knowledge-based economy increase productivity
through better linked production sites and
promote the information society (European Summit
- March 2000) - Ensure with a stable and predictable regulatory
environment that current financial crisis does
not endanger a competitive NGN/NGA roll-out as
the industry is at the beginning of an investment
cycle - Regulatory framework must be able to deal with
convergence as one of the key characteristics
driving market dynamics technological neutrality
8The Convergence Model
9Digital Convergence
Fuente KCC site
10Convergence of networks and integrated devices
- Convergence of networks to multi-service networks
using packet switching with the IP protocol
(NGNs) - This allows a separation of the transport and the
service layer allowing more players to compete - Consequently there is room for a lot of different
business models and it would be a big mistake to
expect one-size-fits-all structures - Intelligence likely to move towards the edge,
more precisely it will be in integrated devices - Consumers have more choice and can use their
devices to receive different types of services,
e.g. watch TV on their PCs, mobile Internet,
mobile TV and innovative services - Triple play offers are a chance for telcos to
compensate for revenue loss in voice services
11Next Generation Network (NGN)
- A next generation network is a packet switched
network providing multiservices,
telecommunications services included, which uses
transport technologies for several bandwidths and
classes of services and in which service-related
functions are independent of the underlying
transport technologies. It gives users
unrestricted access to different service
providers. It supports general mobility and
nomadicity, giving users consistent and
ubiquitous service provision (always-on
services) - Delivering all services across a single network
gives rise to greater economies of scale and
scope - Customers have a more active role to choose
customized combinations of services and will
decide on the provision of services along the
value chain - Providers will offer more bundles (including
content), and more flat rate offers can be
observed as well
12Next Generation Networks
13Convergence of services and markets
- Convergence of voice, data, internet and media
services is no longer a vision but already
reality - The degree of convergence is very different from
nation to nation and between different consumer
groups - The pace of adaptation will vary, and for some
time markets will be split in many segments
early adopters, technology freaks and
frontrunners, smart followers and people who are
unwilling to change and are only looking for
cheap voice calls will coexist - With services converging, markets will slowly be
converging as well, e.g. a separate fixed
services and mobile services market will become a
single market for communications services,
consumer considering fixed and mobile calls
substitutable, more and more they will replace
traditional voice services with VoIP services
14How can the further development of telecom
networks be financed?
- Users demand ever faster networks and more
capacity but is there a willingness to pay
premium prices for premium connectivity? - High capacity connectivity requires expensive
investments i.e. in FTTH rollouts or new mobile
networks - Refinancing such investments may be difficult in
urban areas, but it may be impossible in rural
environments (because of the lower
population/user density) - It is doubtful, that the infrastructure cost of
NGN/NGA can be refinanced by access fees only
15New revenue sharing models required?
- Demand for video over internet in all its
varieties is growing fast - Specific services need specific QoS levels (VoIP,
Streaming, Gaming, Downloads, P2P) - As video is bandwidth intensive, users will
demand more of it without wanting to pay more and
while sticking to flat rate tariffs - The revenue for paid video is likely to go to the
content suppliers while the delivery costs will
stick with the network providers - Dumb networks (utilities) and intelligent
services might not get a fair share in the new
environment - New relationship for revenue sharing between the
traditional telco model and the Internet/web
model? - Network neutrality debate
16Challenges
- NGNs are speeding up the process of convergence
- Investing in new technologies beginning of the
investment cycle in high speed bb networks,
financing needs to be ensured, NRA can
incentivise investment in enhanced infrastr. - NGNs will require adjusting the interconnection
regime from the current narrowband to IP-IC and
ensuring migration - Convergence of fixed and mobile services with
potentially changing market boundaries - Convergence of communications and broadcasting
services with bundled offers (partly regulated,
partly not) - Protect consumers to allow them to benefit from
convergence - New services, new players and a higher market
dynamic - To keep markets open and guarantee a level
playing field by applying the principle of
technological neutrality - Chances and risks for competition
17Chances
- Thus convergence drives changes from both the
supply side (technological change, new business
models) and the demand side (consumers choosing
more bundles such as triple play offers as well
as more flat rate offers) - This will impact on the market definition as well
as on the market structure, convergence is a key
driver of market dynamics - There are chances (more market players offering
more choice for consumers) and risks (leveraging
of market power) for competition - Regulators need to keep markets open (prevent
walled gardens) and ensure interoperability - Consumers must have transparency to make informed
choices and get value for money when subscribing
to an offer - Realize the potential of convergence
18State
Citizen/Consumer
Business
eGovernment, eEnergy, eHealth, Security
new services and business-models
Digital-Lifestyle, Communities
Open Platform for Networks
Secure Broadband- Infrastructure
Internet Of Services
Service-/Consumer- Friendly-IT
Service-oriented Applications
Multimedia Content
Internet of Things
19Consumer protection
- Facilitate switching for customers, e.g. by
making number portability available, in the
future likely between mobile and fixed
geographical numbers - VoIP services allowing nomadism for geographical
numbers (cf. ERG CP on VoIP, ERG (07) 56rev2) - Unduly long contractual periods can be stopped
(to prevent the lock-in effect) - Ensure choice adding-up rule if customer buys
services separately, the total sum of all prices
should not be higher than the price of the bundle - Ensure terminals are reachable as now (no
propriety standards) - Ensure a balanced and competitive neutral stance
towards different business model integrated
operators as well as specialists
20IP-IC/NGN REGULATORY PRINCIPLES
- ERG published its IP-IC/NGN Core Common Statement
(ERG (08) 26) in October 2008 - Content of the Common Statement
- separation between transport and service
important for the development of innovative
services - maximum efficient number of PoI offered in NGNs
for lowest interconnection rate - power to set minimum quality of service
requirements should be entrusted directly upon
NRAs - standardisation, interoperability, reference
offer - NGNs core will lead to a lower overall cost level
- Look at adequacy of charging mechanism
- Bill Keep has promising properties for a future
interconnection regime, but needs further study
work plan elaborated, taken over in WP
2009
21Risks Danger of market dominance under new
market structures?
- Single-supplier bundle products (Phone, Internet,
TV and others) can be consumer-friendly and in
line with the market - Sectoral providers must be able to emulate
bundled-products access-rights may not be
undermined - Consumers must be protected adequately and keep
the right to choose, whether they purchase
bundled- or single-products from one or more
suppliers, flat rates or usage-based tariffs - Innovation in niche-markets are not to be
hindered through the creation of walled gardens - Advantages of the extended individual
communication (Web 2.0) need to be supported
through network- and market-structures - Regulation has to guarantee open market
structures for innovation and cooperation as well
as a level playing field, i.e. prevent the
leveraging of market power foreclosure
22Environment how to handle convergence?
Phenomenon of convergence
Bundling
Replicability
Margin squeeze
Data
TV
Voice
Access to content
Bottlenecks?
Access to networks
(Wholesale)
23Convergence Reports
- The ERG adopted in Berlin on 27 February 09 2
reports on convergence - Report on Fixed-Mobile-Convergence (ERG (09) 06)
- Report on the discussion of the application of
margin squeeze tests to bundles (ERG (09) 07) - Both dealing with questions related to the change
of market situations and competitive dynamics due
to convergence
24Fixed-Mobile-Convergence
- This report presents a preliminary guidance on
the different implications of fixed to mobile
convergent products. - The report describes currently available
convergent products and provides an overview on
the current regulatory situation in the European
countries. - The paper goes one step ahead into the study of
the commercial and regulatory consequences of
convergence, that represents a critical
phenomenon because of the key implications it has
in the telecom sector. - The following aspects are addressed
- FMC products description
- Overview of the competition framework
- Competition issues identified regarding MVNOs and
mobile VoIP
25Application of margin squeeze tests to bundles
- Bundling is challenging current regulatory
practices - in particular where ex ante margin
squeeze (MS) obligations exist on some retail
market. - Convergence will make the analysis of MS on
bundles more relevant. - MS at wholesale-retail level, not between
wholesale services. - Ex ante MS tests. Ex post practice is expressly
excluded of the scope of the report. - MS applied to bundles. Practice on individual
services as a starting point for analysis. - Anticompetitive horizontal effects of bundling is
only considered with reference to MS tests.
26Content of the ERG Margin Squeeze Report
- Provides information on current practices of
European NRAs, describing their methodologies to
assess MS in an ex ante framework. - Describes the current regulatory framework in
relation to MS. - Identifies when MS is more likely and when an ex
ante MS assessment is needed. - Discusses the pros and cons of MS assessment
methodologies in relation to bundling - Discussion will continue and be developed further
27Conclusions
- As NGNs are not disruptive, there should also be
continuity in the European regulatory environment
- Given the tendency towards more convergence that
well see with NGNs being rolled-out, it is
important to maintain the principle of
technological neutrality as a basic principle of
the regulatory framework - In order to ensure that telcos have the
opportunity to create sufficient revenue streams
when upgrading their networks and investing in
new technologies, new marketing and payment
models must be thought of which might imply
rethinking the interface between content and
transport regulation - Convergence might imply new market definitions
taking into account joint marketing of content
and access - In order to realize the advantages of
convergence, leverage of market power and
foreclosure of markets must be prevented by
keeping markets open and creating a competitive
environment among others through regulation
28Back-up
29Regulatory objectives and priorities
- Regulatory objectives
- Promote effective competition for the benefit of
European consumers - Promote efficient investment through
predictability - Promote the internal market through a consistent
application of the regulatory framework - Regulatory priorities - maintain level of
competition (avoid re-monopolization) and
incentivise efficient investment in NGA and NGN
core- maintain balance of service and
infrastructure competition - maintain the
institutional balance in Europe - Ensure that financial crisis does not endanger a
competitive NGN/NGA roll-out
30Growth in fixed and mobile convergence (telephone
channels in million)
31Next Generation Networks (NGN)
- A packet-based network able to provide
telecommunication services and able to make use
of multiple broadband, QoS-enabled transport
technologies and in which service-related
functions are independent from underlying
transport-related technologies. It enables
unfettered access for users to networks and to
competing service providers and/or services of
their choice. It supports generalized mobility
which will allow consistent and ubiquitous
provision of services to users. (ITU Y.2004
(04), 31) - Customers can be be connected via different
access technologies
32Infrastructure Competition
Cable
New technologies
UMTS
Mobile BB
Alternative wired infrastructure
BB wirelessWiMax
Intermodal competition
NGN/NGA
NGN/NGA
Intramodal competition
PSTN incumbent
New entrants
DSL technology
33Broadband penetration rate and its growth in
Europe
Source 14th Implementation Report, publ. March
2009
34Broadband InfrastructuresSense and Sensibility
- In the Media and even more so in advertising, the
potential of future mobile broadband solutions is
often exaggerated - The user-perceived performance of an
infrastructure may differ from expectations - One reason for this is the misconception that the
theoretical performance of networks over the air
interface is attainable under real world
conditions - Several technological and historical restrictions
are to blame for that situation
35Broadband InfrastructuresNo level playing field
36Zukunftsthema Konvergenz
Video on Demand, Podcasts
Inhalte-Konvergenz Digitale Inhalte für
Telekommunikation und Rundfunk
Kooperationen
Settop-Boxen für IPTV, DSL/Kabel
Anschluss-Konvergenz Ein Anschluss kann sowohl
für Telekommunikation als auch für
Rundfunkinhalte genutzt werden