Effects of WashRinse Intervals On Corrosion Early Results Of A Ground Based Study - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Effects of WashRinse Intervals On Corrosion Early Results Of A Ground Based Study

Description:

Present Policy Is To Wash At Specified Intervals Based On ... Recent But Cursory Studies Suggest That This Policy Should Be Examined Further. Study Objectives ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:58
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: william666
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Effects of WashRinse Intervals On Corrosion Early Results Of A Ground Based Study


1
Effects of Wash-Rinse Intervals On Corrosion
Early Results Of A Ground Based Study
  • W.H. Abbott Battelle-Columbus
  • Richard Kinzie AFCPO Warner Robins

2
Introduction
  • Why Do We Presently Wash Aircraft ?
  • Corrosion Control ?
  • Cosmetics ?
  • Present Policy Is To Wash At Specified Intervals
    Based On Environmental Severity (ESI)
  • Recent But Cursory Studies Suggest That This
    Policy Should Be Examined Further

3
Study Objectives
  • Develop Quantitative Data On Effects Of
    Wash-Rinse Intervals On Corrosion Rates
  • Study In Real Environments
  • Study At Different Severity/ESI Levels
  • Use Realistic Wash and Rinse Procedures
  • Obtain Real-Time Corrosion Rate Data Using
    Corrosion Sensor technology

4
Experimental Approach
  • Utilize Metallic Corrosion Sensors As Test
    Vehicle
  • Same Sensors As Being Flight Tested
  • Mounted Vertically In Multiple, Outdoor
    Environments Differing Widely In Severity
  • Wash And Rinse Independent Sensors At Fixed
    Intervals
  • Wash With 5 BB Regel In Local Tap Water
  • Rinse By Spray With Local Tap Water
  • Air Dry Naturally
  • Measure Monthly As Electrical OutputCumulative
    Corrosion

5
Experimental (Contd)
  • Exposure Locations ESI (percentile)
  • Daytona Beach (75 meters) 95(very severe)
  • Daytona Beach (1/4 mile inland) 75 (severe)
  • Central Ohio (WPAFB ESI) 50 (moderate)
  • Warner Robins 30 (mild)
  • Wash Intervals Studied No Wash, 1,2,4,7,14,28
    days
  • Photo Typical Samples On Fence
  • 3 sets Duplicate Samples (0,1,2 days)
  • ESI Test Rack (not washed)

6
Worldwide ESI Distribution vs. Wash-Rinse Site
ESI
7
Example Of Corrosion Kinetics Daytona 75 m.
  • Data Show Consistent Progression Of Degradation
  • Validation of Techniques
  • Benefits Not Immediately Apparent

8
Corrosion vs. Wash Interval Daytona 75 m.
  • Data Show Benefit/ Minimum Corrosion
  • Increasing Benefit With Time But Lost If Extended
    gt 20 days
  • Max Benefit _at_ 1-2 Days

9
Corrosion vs. Wash Interval Daytona ¼ mi. Inland
  • Benefit But Note Scale Change
  • Smaller Benefit But Measurable
  • Max Benefit _at_ 1-2 Days But Gone Within Extend gt 7
    Days

10
Corrosion vs. Wash Interval Central Ohio
  • Slight and Questionable Benefit

11
Corrosion vs. Wash Interval Warner Robins
  • No Apparent Benefit
  • Results Actually Suggest Increased Corrosion
  • Reasons Not Defined
  • Water Quality Issue ?

12
Conclusions
  • Early Results Raise Questions About Wash-Rinse
    Benefits For Corrosion Control In Many
    Environments
  • Reduced Corrosion Rates/Benefits Demonstrated
    Only For Severe Environments (gt70th percentile
    possibly gt90th )
  • Only For Very Frequent Wash or Rinse (1-2 days)
  • Effects Of Rinse Only Not Known (under study)
  • Benefits May Be Lost If Wash Time Extended Beyond
    Few Days
  • Results Must Be Confirmed On Operational Aircraft
    Before Any Changes To Existing Policy Recommended
  • Results May Provide Basis For Relaxation Of
    Wash-Rinse Requirements If Verified
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com