Title: Physics Program at the Caltech LIGO 40m Prototype
1Physics Program at the Caltech LIGO 40m Prototype
- Intro to gravity waves
- The LIGO experiment
- Purpose of the 40m
- Progress
- Building renovation
- Vacuum system controls
- Pre-stabilized laser
- Environmental monitoring
- Data acquisition
- System modeling
- Coming soon
2Warped space-time Einsteins General Relativity
(1916)
We envision gravity as a curvature of space as a
massive body moves, the curvature changes with it.
Einsteins theory tells us that this information
will be carried by gravitational radiation at the
speed of light.
3Strong-field GR
- Most tests of GR focus on small deviations from
Newtonian dynamics
(post-Newtonian weak-field approximation) - Space-time curvature is a tiny effect everywhere
except - The universe in the early moments of the big bang
- Near/in the horizon of black holes
- This is where GR gets non-linear and interesting!
- We arent very close to any black holes
(fortunately!), and cant see them with light
But we can search for (weak-field) gravitational
waves as a signal of their presence and dynamics
4Why are we so confident? Hulse-Taylor binary
pulsar
5Nature of Gravitational Radiation
- General Relativity predicts
- transverse space-time distortions, freely
propagating at speed of light - expressed as a strain (?h ?L/L)
- Conservation laws
- conservation of energy ? no monopole
radiation - conservation of momentum ? no dipole radiation
- quadrupole wave (spin 2) ? two polarizations
- plus (?) and cross (?)
6Magnitude of GW strain
- Accelerating charge ? electromagnetic radiation
- Accelerating mass ? gravitational radiation
- Amplitude of the gravitational wave (dimensional
analysis) -
- second derivative
- of mass quadrupole moment
- (non-spherical part of
- kinetic energy)
- G is a small number!
- Need huge mass, relativistic
- velocities, nearby.
- For a binary neutron star pair,
- 10m light-years away, solar masses
- moving at 15 of speed of light
7The LIGO Project
- LIGO Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave
Observatory - US project to build observatories for
gravitational waves (GWs) - to enable an initial detection, then an astronomy
of GWs - collaboration by MIT, Caltech other institutions
participating - (LIGO Scientific Collaboration, LSC)
- Funded by the US National Science Foundation
(NSF) - Observatory characteristics
- Two sites separated by 3000 km
- each site carries 4km vacuum system,
infrastructure - each site capable of multiple interferometers
(IFOs) - Evolution of interferometers in LIGO
- establishment of a network with other
interferometers - A facility for a variety of GW searches
- lifetime of 20 years
- goal best technology, to achieve fundamental
noise limits for terrestrial IFOs
8International network
Simultaneously detect signal (within msec)
GEO
Virgo
LIGO
TAMA
- detection confidence
-
- locate the sources
- verify light speed propagation
- decompose the polarization of gravitational
waves
AIGO
9How does the LIGO interferometer work?
- The concept is to compare the time it takes light
to travel in two orthogonal directions transverse
to the gravitational waves. - The gravitational wave causes the time difference
to vary by stretching one arm and compressing the
other. - The interference pattern is measured (or the
fringe is split) to one part in 1010, in order to
obtain the required sensitivity.
10Initial LIGO sensitivity
LIGO I
LIGO II
11Seismic isolation stacks
12We need Advanced LIGO!
- X10 in sensitivity x1000 volume searched
- LIGO 0.3-3 inspirals/year
- Adv. LIGO 300-3000 inspirals/year
- Factor of ten improvement needed at all
frequencies
1340m Laboratory Upgrade - Objectives
- Key elements of Advanced LIGO to be prototyped
elsewhere - LASTI, MIT full-scale prototyping of Adv.LIGO
SEI, SUS (low-f) - TNI, Caltech measure thermal noise in Adv.LIGO
test masses (mid-f) - ETF, Stanford advanced IFO configs (Sagnac),
lasers, etc
- Primary objective full engineering prototype of
optics control scheme for a dual recycling
suspended mass IFO (high-f) - Minimize transition time to Advanced LIGO at main
sites - Control scheme set by LSC/AIC, quick test at
Glasgow 10m
1440m Laboratory Upgrade More Objectives
- Expose shot noise curve, dip at tuned frequency
- Multiple pendulum suspensions
- may need to use Adv. LIGO suspensions to fully
test control system - Not full scale. Insufficient head room in
chambers. - Wont replace full-scale LASTI tests.
- Thermal noise measurements
- Mirror Brownian noise will dominate above 100
Hz. - Facility for testing small LIGO innovations
- Hands-on training of new IFO physicists!
- Public tours (students, DNC media,
the Duke of York, etc)
15Arm cavity parameters and LIGO sensitivity
As rITM is increased, Garm is increased, fpol-arm
is decreased.
fpol-arm
We wish to control Garm and fpol-arm
independently to optimize shot noise curve
16The signal recycling mirror
We add a signal recycling mirror (SM) at the
asymmetric output port. This forms a compound
mirror with the input test masses (ITMs) with
reflectivity
with f kls 2pls(fcarrfsig)/c
17Tuning the signal response
By choosing the phase advance of the signal
(fcarrfsig) in the signal recycling cavity, can
get longer (SR) or shorter (RSE) storage of the
signal in the arms
f kls 2pls(fcarrfsig)/c
rCC
rITM
RSE
tuned (narrow band)
RSE
SR
SR
18Using DR to optimize sensitivity
Now we can independently tune hDC and fpolarm to
optimize sensitivity (eg, hug the thermal noise
curve)
1940m Lab Staff
- Alan Weinstein, project leader
- Dennis Ugolini, postdoc
- Steve Vass, master tech and lab manager
- Ben Abbott, electrical engineer
- Advanced LIGO engineers Jay Heefner, Garilynn
Billingsley, Janeen Romie, Mike Smith, Fred
Asiri, Dennis Coyne, Peter King, Rich Abbott,
Rick Karwoski, etc. - Guillaume Michel, visiting grad student
(winter/spring 2001) - Collaborating institutions (CSUDH, TAMA)
- Summer 2000-2001 eleven SURF undergraduates
20Building renovation
- Wall removed for added lab space
- New optical tables installed at vertex, south
arm, ends
- Laser safety enclosure installed
- New control room added
21Vacuum envelope additions
- 12m suspended mode cleaner
22Hardware and electronics
- New electronics racks, crates, cable trays
- Installation of vacuum ion pumps, control system
23STACIS Active seismic isolation
- One set of 3 for each of 4 test chambers
- 6-dof stiff PZT stack
- Active bandwidth of 0.3-100 Hz,
- 20-30dB of isolation
- passive isolation above 15 Hz.
24Vacuum System Overview
- Expanded envelope -- MC, OOC chambers added
- Regenerated, reinstalled ion pumps
- Contaminant level unchanged opted for no
bake-out
H2O
N2
O2
H2
Ar
CO2
25EPICS-based Control System
- Reads out valve status, pump status, and
pressures - Provides operator and monitor screens
- Has code for slow safety interlocking
- Communicates directly with data acquisition
system
26Residual Gas Noise Requirement
The plot at left includes the residual gas noise
for a vacuum of 10-6 torr, dominated by water and
nitrogen. At higher pressures the noise becomes
significant at the tuned frequency.
The 40m vacuum system can run as low as 310-7
torr, and has a pressure of 1.310-6 torr in
low-vibration mode (ion pumps only).
27Pre-stabilized laser (PSL)
We use the same 10-watt NdYAG solid-state
infrared laser as the main LIGO sites. The goal
of the PSL system is to provide frequency and
intensity stabilization, with minimal power loss.
28Frequency stabilization servo (FSS)
By adjusting the lasers master oscillator to
keep a fixed cavity in resonance, the FSS reduces
frequency noise to
29Pre-mode cleaner (PMC)
The PMC uses the concept of Guoy phase to remove
all non-TEM00 modes from the main beam, without
reflecting it back to the PSL
30PEM Weather Station
31PEM Particle Counter
32PEM Seismic Monitoring
4.2 earthquake in Westwood, CA (roughly 20 miles
SW of Caltech) at 5pm on September 9th, 2001
33Cable Flexibility Testing
There has been concern that the in-vacuum cables
used at the sites are too stiff, and would short
out the 40m seismic stacks.
Larry Jones has been acquiring cable prototypes,
which are tested with the apparatus shown here.
The cables are clamped to the MC end chamber
seismic stack, which is then vertically shaken.
Wilcoxon accelerometers are used to measure the
transfer function.
34Flexibility Testing Results
mechanical short
35Data acquisition system (DAQ)
Anti-aliasing filters
ADCU 64 analog-to-digital channels sampled at
up to 16 kHz
EDCU collects data from EPICS databases
512 GB RAID array Full data for 48 hours
Second trends for 1 month Longer trends
forever
Sun Ultra 10 Frame Broadcaster Fast
ethernet connection Serves data for
diagnostics Connection to CACR
Sun Ultra 60 Frame Builder Collects data
from DCUs Creates frame files Sends
files to RAID array
36Interferometer modeling efforts
- Specification of all optical parameters
- Cavity lengths, RF sideband frequencies and
resonance conditions - mirror trans., dimensions, ROC, optical quality,
tolerances - Length and alignment control with Twiddle,
ModalModel - Suspensions for 5" test masses modeled using
Simulink - Model of IFO DC response with imperfect optics in
progress using FFT program (CSUDH group) - Model of lock acquisition dynamics using E2E in
progress
37Optics Parameters (flat ITMs)
ETM
5.2422 57375
38250
3.0266 ?
ITM
Vacuum
MMT
MC
PSL
MMT
RF
ITM
ETM
RM
2646
173.7
BS
1000
149.3
1450.8
149.5
927.1
38250
2600
200
1145.4
12165
3.0266 ?
3.0408 -2.8103e5
3.0436 -2.5749e5
0.9854 1165.2
1.6288 4.5225e5
5.2422 57375
3.0674 -1.3929e5
1.6288 -4.5225e5
1500
0.371 ?
1.6435 58765
3.0448 -1.7481e5
3.0632 -1.776e5
1.6616 -40241
1.6285 ?
3.0219 17250
38Whats to come?Mode cleaner optics
- The suspensions are being baked at LLO, should
be back next week - The 3 diameter optics are scheduled to arrive
in mid-February - Must be carefully hanged and balanced before
installation in the 40m
39Whats to come?Length sensing and control (LSC)
- Each optic has five OSEMs (magnet and coil
assemblies), four on the back, one on the side
- The magnet occludes light from the LED, giving
position - Current through the coil creates a magnetic
field, allowing mirror control
40Milestones through 2004
- 2Q 2002
- Install cables and seismic stacks in mode
cleaner, output optics chamber - Hang and install mode cleaner optics
- Install suspension controllers, LSC, some ASC
- Glasgow 10m experiment informs 40m program
- 4Q 2002
- Hang and install core optics
- Complete ASC, ISC
- Control system finalized
- 3Q 2003 Core subsystems commissioned, begin
experiments - Lock acquisition with all 5 length dof's, 2x6
angular dof's - Measure transfer functions, noise
- Inform CDS of required modifications
- 3Q 2004 Next round of experiments.
- DC readout. Multiple pendulum suspensions?