Risk Assessment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 61
About This Presentation
Title:

Risk Assessment

Description:

US Airways Magazine, October 1991. Risk Assessment/Risk Management. Risk Identification ... Peter Preuss, US EPA. Risk Assessment. Difficult process (expertise ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:752
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 62
Provided by: benjami51
Category:
Tags: airways | assessment | risk | us

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Risk Assessment


1
Risk Assessment Risk Management
  • EMD 545b Lecture 2

2
Risk Assessment
US Airways Magazine, October 1991
3
Risk Management
US Airways Magazine, October 1991
4
Risk Assessment/Risk Management
  • Risk Identification
  • Adverse events?
  • Risk Estimation
  • Probability of adverse event?
  • Risk Management
  • Control measures?

5
Risk (Definitions)
  • Possibility of loss, injury, disease, or death.
    Webster's Medical Desk Dictionary (1986)
  • The probability that exposure to a hazard will
    lead to a negative consequence. David Ropeik,
    George Gray (2002)
  • To risk living is to risk dying. Anonymous

6
Risk Assessment
  • The emergent science based on toxicology,
    epidemiology and statistics that utilizes
    qualitative and quantitative hazard analysis to
    provide the public with a reasonable estimate of
    probability of harm.
  • Not a scalpel, but a crude tool that allows you
    to make estimates. Peter Preuss, US EPA

7
Risk Assessment
  • Difficult process
    (expertise of many fields needed)
  • Involves uncertainty
  • Range provided (not a specific number)
  • Estimates for society (individual risk may vary)
  • Reasonable worst-case estimate (better to
    overestimate than underestimate risk)
  • Costs and benefits of proposed actions helpful

8
4 Steps in Risk Assessment (Jeff Wheelwright,
1996)
  • 1) Identify health hazard
  • 2) Quantify hazard
  • 3) Exposure assessment (from source to at risk
    person)
  • 4) Determine probability of disease (based on
    exposure estimate and potency of agent)

9
Biohazard Epidemiology
  • Incidence of Hepatitis among Danish clinical
    chemistry workers 7X higher than general
    population (Skinholj, 1974)
  • Risk of acquiring TB 5X greater among medical lab
    workers in England than general population
    (Harrington Shannon, 1976)

10
Hierarchy of Controls
  • Anticipation
  • Recognition
  • Evaluation
  • Control
  • substitution
  • administrative
  • engineering
  • work practices
  • personal protective clothing
  • facility features

11
Biohazard Risk Assessment
  • Qualitative exercise
    (inexact)
  • General guidelines
    to assess/control risk
  • agent in use, volumes, concentration
  • proposed practices/procedures
  • proposed location
  • training, experience, health status of worker

12
Biohazard Risk Assessment
  • Use to determine appropriate combination of
    containment
  • lab practices
  • safety equipment
  • facility design
  • Primary Containment
  • protects handlers and those in immediate vicinity
  • Secondary Containment
  • protects environment and those outside the lab

13
Biohazard Risk Assessment Pathway
  • Principal Investigator (initiates risk review)
  • Biosafety Officer (assists PI)
  • Institutional Biosafety Committee (must review
    and approve PIs submission)
  • Assistance through
  • published listings, guidelines (U.S. and abroad)
  • other experts at host institution, local public
    health
  • other institutions working with same agents
  • Government entities (CDC, NIH, USDA, FDA, etc.)

14
Risk Assessment Pathway
  • Principal Investigator initiates process
  • Qualitative process
  • Agent
  • Virulence, pathogenicity, communicability,
    environmental stability, dose, route of exposure,
    availability of therapy
  • Use Risk Group Lists
  • Consider proposed procedures
  • Operations, quantity (volume/concentration),
    generation of aerosols, sharps, animals

15
(No Transcript)
16
Routes of Exposure to Infectious Agents
  • Inhalation of aerosols
  • Through intact or non-intact skin (needlestick,
    injury (broken glass), animal bites or scratches,
    vector (mosquito, tick, parasite), eczema,
    dermatitis
  • Mucous membranes of eyes, nose or mouth
  • Ingestion (mouth pipetting)
  • Contact (indirect transfer from hands or
    contaminated surfaces)

17
Infectious Agents are Classified by Level of
Hazard
  • 4 Agent Risk Group Classifications
  • RG1 RG2 RG3 RG4

Moderate individual risk
Low individual risk
High individual risk
High risk to community
No risk to community
Low risk to community
18
Risk Groups (RG)
  • RG1
  • Not infectious to healthy adults
  • e.g. E. coli K12 strains, B. subtilis, S.
    cerevisiae
  • RG2
  • Infectious agents of varying severity, treatment
    usually available, predominantly bloodborne,
    ingestion, and mucous membrane routes of exposure
  • e.g. Salmonella, Shigella, Vibrio, Plasmodium,
    Hepatitis B Virus, Cryptococcus neoformans
  • Both RG1/RG2 can be used in a basic lab
  • containment equipment to contain aerosols

19
Risk Groups (RG)
  • RG3
  • potential to cause serious or lethal disease,
    airborne route of exposure (and others),
    treatment generally not available, lower
    infectious dose.
  • Containment Lab 2 doors off general corridor,
    dedicated air handler, controlled airflow, all
    work contained
  • e.g. TB, Vesicular Stomatitis Virus, Yellow Fever
    Virus, Coxiella burneti, Francisella tularensis

20
Risk Groups (RG)
  • RG4
  • Dangerous, exotic agents with high risk to
    individual and community. Aerosol transmission
    along with all other routes. Very low infectious
    dose, high mortality rates.
  • Building within building approach for research
    purposes.
  • e.g. Ebola virus, Marburg virus, Junin, Lassa,
    Machupo, Sabia, Equine Morbillivirus (Hendra-like
    viruses), Tick-Borne Encephalitis Viruses

21
Risk Assessment Pathway
  • Principal Investigator responsible for completing
    initial risk assessment
  • Start with risk group for parent organism
  • Consider the proposed procedures
  • Identify Risk Management Procedures
  • Facility design elements
  • Safety or containment equipment
  • Work practices

22
Laboratory Safety
Containment Levels
  • 4 Laboratory Biosafety Levels
  • BSL1 BSL2 BSL3 BSL4

Basic laboratory, confine aerosols in biosafety
cabinet if needed
Containment lab, 2 door separation from general
traffic, negative air flow, alarms
Maximum containment lab, building w/in building,
all features isolated, pos. pressure suits, glove
box type isolation
23
Hybrid Biosafety Level
  • BSL2/BSL3 (BL2)
  • Creutzfeld Jacob
  • HIV
  • High risk clinical specimens
  • BSL3-Enhanced (HEPA filtered exhaust Lab)
  • Yellow Fever, Rift Valley Fever Virus, VEE
  • Rickettsia rickettsii

24
Unknown Specimens
  • Facility Evaluation (highest level of protection
    available)
  • B.A.R.E
  • Block All Routes
    of Exposure

25
Containment achieved with
  • Good microbiological practices
  • Safety Equipment
  • Facility Design

26
Risk Assessment Pathway
  • Institutional Biosafety Committee verifies and
    approves PI Risk Assessment
  • Review of written risk assessment
  • Verification of personnel training and experience
  • Biosafety courses
  • Hands-on experience/proficiency
  • Safety record
  • Inspection of facility and work practices
  • Formal approval of protocol

27
Find Assigned Risk Group for
  • Brucella canis
  • Chlamydia trachomatis
  • diagnostic work
  • high concentrations
  • Francisella tularensis
  • diagnostic/clinical work
  • cell culture experiments
  • Coccidioides immitis
  • clinical specimens
  • cultures
  • Prions
  • human prions
  • animal prions
  • Rabies virus
  • HIV/SIV
  • research scale
  • Vesicular Stomatitis virus
  • lab adapted strains
  • Isolates from livestock
  • rDNA, Insertion of oncogene into human cells
  • Vesicular Stomatitis virus-NJ with HIV gp 120
  • Botulinum toxin

28
Risk Assessment Risk Management
  • Prior Planning Prevents Poor Performance

29
Risk Assessment Risk Management
  • Pathogen (Agent)
  • Procedures (Protocol)
  • Personnel
  • Protective Equipment
  • Place (Proposed lab facility)

30
P-1 Pathogen
  • Should this agent be used in this experiment? On
    this campus?
  • Note concentration or amplification in lab may
    present greater hazard than in nature.

31
PATHOGEN
  • Agent Classification (Prior LAIs)
  • Source of agent
  • Routes of Exposure
  • Infectious Dose (LD50s for toxins)
  • Pathogenicity
  • Virulence
  • Antibiotic resistance

32
Infectious Dose
  • Agent
  • Ebola virus
  • TB
  • Tularemia
  • Anthrax
  • Cholera
  • Salmonella typhi
  • E. coli
  • Shigella
  • Dose
  • 1
  • 1 - 10
  • 10
  • gt1300?????
  • 108
  • 105
  • 108
  • 109

33
PATHOGEN
  • Quantity/Concentration
  • Incidence in the Community
  • Immunization/Treatment
  • Communicability
  • Presence of Vectors
  • Environmental Concerns (stability)
  • Data from animal experiments
  • Clinical specimens

34
Immunizations
  • Vaccinia
  • Tetanus
  • Meningococcal Immunization
  • Typhoid
  • Botulinum
  • Hepatitis B virus, Hepatitis A virus
  • Yellow Fever, EEE
  • Rabies

35
rDNA Molecules
  • Classification of parent agent
  • Toxins
  • Antibiotic resistance genes
  • Altered host range or tropism
  • Replication competency
  • Integration into host genome
  • Toxicity, allergenicity, other

36
P-2 Personnel
  • Are the proposed researchers capable of safely
    conducting these experiments?

37
PERSONNEL
  • Host Immunity
  • neoplastic disease/infectionimmunosuppressive
    therapyage, race, sex, pregnancysurgery
    (splenectomy, gastrectomy)diabetes, lupus
  • Reproductive age
  • Contraindications for therapy

38
PERSONNEL
  • Medical Surveillance
  • prophylactic immunizations
  • serum storage
  • post-exposure prophylaxis/treatment
  • screening

39
PERSONNEL
  • aware of hazards
  • prior documented work experience
  • microbiological proficiency (observed)
  • comfort/choice

40
PERSONNEL
  • Safety Attitude
  • Those who have fewer accidents adhere to safety
    regulations respect infectious agents defensive
    work habits able to recognize potential hazards
  • Women
  • Older employees (age 45-64)

41
PERSONNEL
  • Safety Attitude
  • Those who have more accidents low opinion of
    safety take excessive risks work too fast less
    aware of risks
  • Men
  • Younger employees (age 17-24)

42
P-3 Protective Equipment
  • Has the Principal Investigator selected the
    appropriate combination of personal protective
    clothing and safety equipment for the safe
    conduct of research?

43
Protective Equipment
  • Personal Protective Equipment (clothing)
  • Containment Equipment
  • Biological safety cabinets
  • Safety centrifuges
  • Sealed sonicators, blenders, homogenizers
  • Sealed tubes, transport carriers
  • Safe sharps, needleboxes, medical waste bags,
    tongs, forceps, etc.

44
PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
  • Protect skin clothing mucous
    membranes respiratory system
  • Use gloves (double, kevlar) lab coats,
    solid-front gowns sleeve covers full face
    protection respiratory protection

45
PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
  • Disposable
  • Decontamination
  • Dedicated to area
  • Donning/Doffing
  • Compromised (wet/contaminated/torn)
  • Respiratory Protection Program

46
P-4 Place (Facility Design)
  • Does this research group have (or have access to)
    a laboratory with the requisite containment
    features this work?

47
PLACE FACILITY DESIGN
  • Restricted access/Door sign
  • Easily cleanable
  • Hand washing sinks (near exit door)
  • Eye wash
  • Autoclave
  • Vacuum system protection
  • Biosafety Cabinet

48
PLACE FACILITY DESIGN
  • Anteroom
  • Negative pressure gradient
  • Airflow monitor
  • Air changes per hour (10-15)
  • Sealed penetrations, coved flooring
  • Facility alarms/interlocks
  • Communication outside the lab

49
P-5 Procedures
  • Has the Principal Investigator outlined all of
    the proposed steps in the protocol?
  • Has the lab outlined sufficient protective work
    practices to minimize the risk to those working
    and those outside the lab?

50
PROCEDURES
  • Develop standard written practices (SOPs) for
    handling pathogens
  • Job Safety Analysis (JSA)
  • identify each task
  • describe all steps
  • hazard assessment at each step
  • incorporate safety
  • Focus on containing aerosol generating procedures
    and equipment

51
Aerosols
  • Procedures that impart energy into a microbial
    suspension are a potential source of aerosol
    (Chatigny, 1974)
  • Many common lab procedures and accidents have
    capability of releasing aerosols
  • homogenization, sonication, blending, mixing,
    grinding, shaking, vortexing, spills, opening
    vials, pipetting, animals excreting agent,
    opening vials under pressure, etc.

52
Viable Particles Recovered from Air (Chatigny,
1974)
  • Procedure
  • sonic oscillator
  • mixing w/ pipette
  • overflow from mixer
  • opening lyophilized vial
  • top removed after blending
  • dropping flask of culture
  • dropping lyophilized culture
  • Particles/ft3 of air
  • 6
  • 7
  • 9
  • 135
  • 1500
  • 1551
  • 4839

53
Procedures - Sharps Hazards
  • Syringe/Needle
  • adjusting volume
  • withdrawal from stopper
  • separation from syringe
  • leaking syringe
  • leakage from injection site
  • inappropriate disposal
  • poor work practices

54
Procedures - Sharps Precautions
  • Syringe/Needle
  • use needle-locking syringes
  • cover with disinfectant soaked gauze
  • animal restraints
  • cleanse inoculation site
  • safe needle practices
  • immediate collection/disposal

55
Procedures - Sharps Precautions
  • Needle/syringe
  • removal of needle from syringe (hemostat)
  • no recapping, bending, breaking, etc.
  • immediate disposal of intact needle/syringe
  • location of needlebox (vicinity, height)
  • replacement of needleboxes
  • eliminate/minimize use/safe sharp devices
  • avoid glass Pasteur pipettes

56
Procedures presenting risk
  • Microbiological loop
  • streaking plates
  • spreading material on slides
  • cooling loop in media
  • heating loop in an open flame

57
Precautions in bacteriology
  • Microbiological loop
  • smooth plates
  • disposable plastic loops
  • well formed loops with short staff
  • glass spreaders
  • electric (walled) micro-incinerators
  • work within a biosafety cabinet

58
Procedures with general risk
  • Pipetting
  • mouth pipetting
  • glass Pasteur pipettes
  • blow-out pipettes
  • mixing suspensions
  • spill of droplets onto hard surfaces
  • Eating, drinking, smoking, applying cosmetics

59
PROCEDURES
  • Pipetting
  • no mouth pipetting
  • disposable plastic pipettes
  • mark to mark pipettes
  • collect within biosafety cabinet
  • work over disinfectant-wet pad
  • Restrict consumption of food or beverage to well
    defined break areas

60
PROCEDURES
  • Centrifugation
  • broken/leaking tubes
  • microfuge tubes (snap caps)
  • (flawed/overfilled)
  • Protective Measures
  • check O-rings on rotors (use O-ring tubes)
  • safety cups/sealed rotors
  • load/unload in a biosafety cabinet

61
Risk Assessment Example
  • Hantavirus Protocol
  • Application of 5 Ps
  • Hierarchy of controls
  • Pathogen
  • Personnel
  • Place
  • Procedures
  • Protective Equipment
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com