New Balance of Redistribution and Market Institutions in Modern Russian Economy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

New Balance of Redistribution and Market Institutions in Modern Russian Economy

Description:

Economy, politics and ideology in the society are strongly interrelated ... communitarian ideology. unitary-centralized political order ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:51
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: kird
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: New Balance of Redistribution and Market Institutions in Modern Russian Economy


1
New Balance of Redistribution and Market
Institutions in Modern Russian Economy
  • Svetlana Kirdina
  • Russian Academy of Sciences,
  • Institute of Economics

2
Main parts of presentation
  • Methodology
  • Results
  • Explanations

3
Institutional matrices theory
  • Economy, politics and ideology in the society are
    strongly interrelated
  • Economic, political and ideological institutions
    comprise
  • the institutional matrix of the society
  • Two types of institutional matrices can be
    singled out an X-matrix and an Y-matrix
  • (in details see Kirdina S. in Proceedings of
    Hawaii International Conference on Social
    Sciences, 2003 or www.kirdina.ru)

4
X- and Y-matrices
redistribution economy
X
Y
federative-subsidiary political order
ideology of subsidiarity
unitary-centralized political order
communitarian ideology
market economy
5
Combinations of X- and Y-matrices
  • Russia, China, the USA and
  • most Asian and European
  • Latin America countries countries

6
X- and Y-institutions in economy and their
functions
7
Causes of economic reforms
  • By the middle 1980s on the eve of perestroika (in
    terminology of the Soviet Union) or transition
    economy (in terms of world social sciences)
    Russia had the unbalanced institutional economic
    structure.
  • Only redistribution X-institutions predominated.
    Necessary market Y-institutions were undeveloped
    and performed as latent, shadow or illegal forms.
  • Such disbalance resulted in the non-efficiency of
    the social system and the deep decrease of its
    economic and social parameters.

8
The first phase of institutional reforms-1
  • In the middle of 1980s new political leadership
    began to develop the market Y-institutions on the
    legislative basis
  • the privatization of the majority of the state
    enterprises put into practice to create the
    private property
  • the decentralization in the economic governance
    system was realized to develop the exchange
    transactions instead of redistribution. The state
    planning system (Gosplan) was eliminated. The
    price management was stopped

9
The first phase of institutional reforms-2
  • new laws about the creation and liquidation of
    business in all branches of economy were passed
    to promote the competition
  • the contract labor institution substitutes for
    the employed labor because the state system of
    manpower training and distribution was
    liquidated. The relationships between employees
    and employers became the subject of the contract.
    The state salary management was canceled
  • gaining profit (Y-efficiency) becomes the main
    criteria for new enterprises and their owners
    acting in open and competitive market
    environment.

10
The result of first phase of reforms
  • The attempt to replace the redistribution
    institutions by the market ones was not very
    successful
  • It was neither growth of the total efficiency in
    economy nor expected efficiency increase of the
    new companies
  • In 1998 after the default the state economic
    policy was turned to the search for the optimal
    and balanced combination of related market and
    redistribution economic institutions.

11
The second phase of institutional reforms - 1
  • Since late 1990s early 2000s new political
    leaders paid more attention to the modernization
    of redistribution X-institutions rather than to
    the implementation of market Y-institution as it
    was before
  • the supreme conditional property - the creation
    of the large-scale joint-stock companies and
    holding structures under the management (or with
    control share in capital) of federal or regional
    governments
  • the redistribution - new National Projects and
    State Corporations under the federal governance
    and supported by the federal budget. The
    centralized structure of them on the new level
    puts the redistribution scheme into life

12
The second phase of institutional reforms - 2
  • the cooperation - state bodies involve different
    business structures into the decision-making
    process of the development of the country
    (investment participation including) and
    encourage the establishment of different forms of
    cooperation with business structures
  • the employed labor institution - the
    organization of the industry specialists
    education system on the basis of
    private-and-state partnership with the state in
    leading position and the growth of non-monetary
    social factors of labor reward
  • cost reduction (X-efficiency) - price and tariffs
    regulation both on federal and regional levels.
    The main objective of the corresponding
    commissions is not the revenue of the companies
    but the decrease of general resources use as well
    as national product expenditure.

13
Picture of the institutional dynamics
t
2007
1998 (default)
Y Market institutions
X Redistribution institutions
1985
0
1
14
Actual result of Russian reforms
  • The new balance of redistribution and market
    institutions is being created in Russia in favor
    of the former.
  • It goes along with the recent growth of economic
    and social development indexes in Russia. In 2006
    Russia occupied the 10-th(compare to the 18-th in
    2005) place on the GDP index in the world.

15
Why the redistribution model dominates?
  • The prevailing of redistribution institutions in
    Russian economy is not the result of the
    malicious intent of some political forces or the
    consequence of traditional and undeveloped
    Russian society.
  • Marshall marginal approach explains the
    objective and pragmatic reasons for the
    redistribution model dominating.

16
Equilibrium of supply and demand for branches
with increasing marginal returns
17
Equilibrium of supply and demand for branches
with diminishing marginal returns
18
The conclusion
  • In Russia the share of branches with diminishing
    marginal returns such as transportation,
    energetic complex, housing and social spheres
    is more than a half (57 per
    cent of fixed assets in 2006).
  • According to the marginal costs theory here the
    redistribution institutional structure is more
    preferable than the market one.
  • New balance of redistribution and market
    institutions in modern Russian economy confirms
    it.

19
  • Thank you for your attention.
  • www.kirdina.ru
  • kirdina_at_inecon.ru
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com