Measurements, Analysis, and Modeling of BitTorrentlike Systems

1
Measurements, Analysis, and Modeling of
BitTorrent-like Systems

• Lei Guo1, Songqing Chen2, Zhen Xiao3,
• Enhua Tan1, Xiaoning Ding1, and Xiaodong Zhang1
• 1College of William and Mary
• 2George Mason University, 3AT T Labs - Research

2
Basic Model of P2P Systems

• Peers sharing different files self-organize into
  a P2P network
• Exchange files they desire
• Limitations
• Free riding
• Large file downloading

Examples Gnutella, KaZaa, eDonkey/eMule/Overnet
3
BitTorrent Fast Delivery with Incentive

• A large file is divided into chunks
• Peers interested in the same file self-organize
  into a torrent
• Peers exchange file chunks with each other
• Incentive is established by tit for tat
• Very simple and effective, scale fairly well
  during flash crowd

Torrent of Bits
4
BitTorrent Traffic

• Online users
• 6.8 million in August 2004, 9.6 million in August
  2005 (BigChampagne)
• Traffic volume
• 53 of all P2P traffic on the Internet in June
  2004 (CacheLogic)

P2P traffic 60-80 Other traffic
20-30 Source CacheLogic, 2004
5
Limited Understanding of BitTorrent

• Existing studies on BitTorrent systems
  (INFOCOM04, SIGCOMM04)
• Unrealistic assumptions in system model no
  evolution considered
• Single-torrent based more than 85 BT users join
  multiple torrents
• What we are not clear about BitTorrent systems
• Service availability
• Service stability
• Service fairness
• Our objective of this work
• Evolution of single-torrent system, and
  limitations of BT
• Multi-torrent model for inter-torrent relation
  and collaboration

during the entire lifetime
6
Outline

• BitTorrent mechanism and our methodology
• Modeling and characterization of single-torrent
  system
• Modeling and characterization of multi-torrent
  system
• Inter-torrent collaboration
• Conclusion

7
How BitTorrent Works Publishing
announce tracker URL for bootstrap creation
date epoch time of file
creation length file size name file name piece
length chunk size pieces SHA1 hash key
of each chunk
peer list

• The publisher
• Create a meta file
• Publish on a Web site
• Start the tracker site
• Start a BT client as the initial seed

8
How BitTorrent Works Downloading

• The downloader
• Download the meta file
• Start a BT client, connect to the tracker site
• Get peer list from tracker
• Get first chunk from other peers (seeds)

9
How BitTorrent Works Downloading

• The downloader
• Download the meta file
• Start a BT client, connect to the tracker site
• Get peer list from tracker
• Get first chunk from other peers (seeds)
• Exchange file chunk with other peers
• Download complete become a new seed

10
How BitTorrent Works Downloading

• The downloader
• Download the meta file
• Start a BT client, connect to the tracker site
• Get peer list from tracker
• Get first chunk from other peers (seeds)
• Exchange file chunk with other peers
• Download complete become a new seed
• Initial seed leaves

Future performance Depends on the arrival and
departure of new downloaders and seeds
peer list
seed
11
Our Methodology of this Study

• Measurement
• BitTorrent traffic pattern
• Meta file downloading and tracker statistics
• Analysis
• BitTorrent user behavior and performance
  limitations
• Curve fitting, parameter estimation and
  validation of mathematical models
• Modeling
• Torrent evolution and inter-torrent relation
• Fluid model, probability model, and graph model

12
Meta File Downloading

• The first HTTP packets of .torrent file
  downloading
• Cable network 3,000 downloads, 1,000 torrent
  meta files
• Server farm 50 tracker sites host hundreds of
  torrents
• Gigasope fast Internet traffic monitoring tool
  by ATT
• What information it contains?
• Torrent birth time
• Peer arrival time to the torrent
  (packet capture time
  of downloading)
• About 10 days

13
Torrent Statistics on Trackers

• Professional/dedicated tracker sites
• Each may host thousands of torrents at the same
  time
• http//www.alluvion.org/ and http//www.crapness.c
  om/, collected by University of Massachusetts,
  Amherst
• Ex alluvion -- 1,500 torrents, 550 are fully
  traced
• What information it contains?
• Torrents torrent birth time, file size, number
  of peers/seeds
• Peers request time, downloading/uploading bytes,
  downloading/uploading bandwidth
• Sampled every 0.5 hour for 48 days

14
Outline

• BitTorrent mechanism and our methodology
• Modeling and characterization of single-torrent
  system
• The evolution of torrent over time
• Limitations of current BitTorrent systems
• Modeling and characterization of multi-torrent
  system
• Inter-torrent collaboration
• Conclusion

15
Torrent Popularity
6 in average
time after torrent birth (day)
derivative of CCDF
16
Torrent Death
Peer n arrives at time tn
When tn ? ?, what will happen?
inter-arrival time seed service time
torrent dead
17
Torrent Population and Lifespan
Most torrents are small (avg 102)
Most torrents are short live (avg 8 days)
18
Downloading Failure Ratio

• Define
• Avg downloading failure ratio
• about 10
• Different evolution patterns
• Small population ? large Rfail
• Reminder most torrents have small population!
• Altruistic peers make torrents long live

19
Torrent Evolution Fluid Model

• Existing model (SIGCOMM 04)
• Constant arrival rate ? const
• Torrent reaches equilibrium
• The correct model
• Exponentially decreasing arrival rate
• Torrent dead finally
• Verified by our measurements
• Two completely different pictures

20
Torrent Evolution Modeling Results

• Flash crowd
• Downloader exponentially ?
• Seed exponentially ?
• Peek time
• A very short duration
• Constant arrival model flat peak
• Attenuation a long tail
• Downloader exponentially ?
• Seed exponentially ?
• Constant arrival model is far from the reality
  no attenuation
• Torrent death

constant arrival model
of downloaders
constant arrival model
of seeds
21
Performance Stability
Evolution over time
avg download speed (byte/sec)
Only stable when torrent is large Fluctuate
significantly after peak time
Larger torrents have higher and more table
performance
22
Service Unfairness

• Unfairness ? download speed, ? uploading
  contribution
• Seeds serve high speed downloaders first
• Peers not willing to serve after downloading
• Not due to new file downloading selfish

23
Single-torrent Model Summary

• Torrent evolution over time
• Exponentially decreasing arrival rate
• Flash crowd short peak long tailed
  attenuation
• BitTorrent Limitations
• Content availability torrent death
• Performance stability
• Service fairness

24
Outline

• BitTorrent mechanism and our methodology
• Modeling and characterization of single-torrent
  system
• Modeling and characterization of multi-torrent
  system
• Traffic pattern and user behavior
• Graph based model of inter-torrent relation
• Inter-torrent collaboration
• Conclusion

25
Multi-torrent Environment Dynamics
Torrent birth
Request arrival
Peer birth
CDF of torrents
CDF of requests
CDF of peers
------ raw data ------ linear fit
------ raw data ------ asymptotic fit
------ raw data ------ linear fit
Torrent birth time, request arrival time, and
peer birth time (hour)

• Considering peers and torrents on the Internet as
  an open system
• Torrent birth rate, torrent request rate, and
  peer birth rate are constant
• Implication
• The lifecycle of a BT peer downloading, seeding,
  sleeping, , dead

26
Peer Request Pattern Request Rate
102
108

• Peer request rate
• requests by a peer to different torrents per
  unit time

101
104
? r (day)
of torrents
Assume
x torrents
? r
100
100
?r ? 77 years !
0 2000 4000
peers

• Peer request process seems Poisson-like
• Request a new torrent with a probability p
  participation probability
• Dead with probability 1-p

27
Peer Request Pattern Participation Probability
Probability model
peers request at least m torrents
p 0.8551
Another estimation of p
Probability model confirmed
28
Inter-torrent Relation Graph How Torrents Can
Help with Each Other?
some peers in torrent i have downloaded j
1
j
i
2
some peers in torrent j have downloaded i
29
Inter-torrent Relation Graph How Torrents Can
Help with Each Other?
some peers in torrent i have downloaded j
1
j
i
2
some peers in torrent j have downloaded i

• Edge weight Wi,j number of such peers

30
Single-torrent vs. Multi-torrent Model

• Single-torrent model
• ? seed service time, ? download failure rate
• Limited seed service time ?, but inter-arrival
  time ? exponentially
• Small improvement
• Multi-torrent model
• Old peers come back multiple times
• ? peer arrival rate, ? peer inter-arrival time
• Significant improvement

31
Single-torrent vs. Multi-torrent Model
Multi-torrent model
Single-torrent model
0.1
seeds stay 10 times longer ? ? /10
torrent death ?' (T'life) ?
0.01
1?10-6 0
Inter-torrent collaboration is much more
effective than stimulating seeds to serve longer
32
Outline

• BitTorrent mechanism and our methodology
• Modeling and characterization of single-torrent
  system
• Modeling and characterization of multi-torrent
  system
• Inter-torrent collaboration
• Tracker site overlay
• Instant incentive for collaboration
• Conclusion

33
Tracker Site Overlay
B
Neighbor-in
torrents that can serve me
B C
A
Neighbor-out
torrents that I can serve (peer list)
D
D
C

• Self-organized P2P network (a logical structure)
• An instance of inter-torrent relation graph
• A built-in mechanism for content search, cover
  99 torrents
• Trackerless BitTorrent uses DHT to store meta
  file

34
Incentive for Inter-Torrent Collaboration
B
A
C
D
Tom

• Instant incentive similar to tit-for-tat
  principle
• Neighboring cycle detection
• Neighboring cycle construction
• Bandwidth trading get one chunk, serve multiple
  peers

35
Conclusion

• Extensive analysis and modeling to study the
  behaviors of BT-like systems
• Tracker trace and .torrent downloading trace
• Mathematical model
• BitTorrent system has its limitations due to
  exponentially decreasing peer arrival rate
• Service availability, performance stability, and
  fairness
• Graph based multi-torrent model
• System design for inter-torrent collaboration

36
Thank you!
37
Backup for Questions
38
Torrent Lifespan

• Extract ?t and t from trace
• Get ?0 and ? using linear regression
• Lifespan model verified by measurement

39
Torrent Population
Total population

• Model verified by measurement
• Observations
• The population of most torrents are small (102 in
  average)
• Downloading failure ratio
• Small population ? large Rfail

40
Torrent Evolution Fluid Model
Basic equation set
Parameters
Resolution
41
Peer Request Pattern Summary

• Multi-torrent environment an open model
• Torrent birth rate 0.9454 per hour (nearly a
  constant)
• Peer birth rate 19.37 per hour (nearly a
  constant)
• Torrent request rate (for all peers over all
  torrents) 133.39 per hour (nearly a constant)
• Actually increase slowly according to
  BigChampagne
• Peer request pattern
• Lifecycle downloading, seeding, sleeping, ,
  next req with prob. p
• Peer participation probability 0.85
• Request rate (for different torrents by a peer)
  Poission-like

42
Tracker Site Overlay

• Table size
• Node degree distribution
• Similar to unstructured P2P networks
• Many content search and msg routing algorithms
• Flooding
• Random walk
• Trackerless BitTorrent uses DHT to store meta
  file

43
Simulation Experiments
without inter-collaboration with
inter-collaboration
performance stability
service fairness
content availability
downloading speed
downloading failure ratio
contribution ratio
Rfail? 0
more balanced
more stable
Inter-torrent collaboration can improve
BitTorrent performance