Federal Grants Managers: The Professionals Who Remain in Limbo - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Federal Grants Managers: The Professionals Who Remain in Limbo

Description:

Federal Grants Managers: The Professionals Who Remain in Limbo ... Opinions only those of the speaker. Based on Federal service (in two different departments ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:34
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: LMI13
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Federal Grants Managers: The Professionals Who Remain in Limbo


1
Federal Grants Managers The Professionals Who
Remain in Limbo
  • Presentation to the National Grants Management
    Association
  • April 29, 2003
  • Ellen Angus
  • Logistics Management Institute

2
Background
  • Opinions only those of the speaker
  • Based on Federal service (in two different
    departments with differing classification
    approaches
  • Manager of 1102s and 1101s (predominant HHS job
    series for Grants Management Specialists)
  • Work with multiple Federal agencies over last 7
    years
  • Management reviews
  • Customer/employee surveys

3
Examining the Premise
  • What do we mean by professional?
  • What is the impact of not having a professional
    series? (real or perceived)
  • What are the benefits of having a professional
    series? (real or perceived)
  • What issues will a professional series not
    address?
  • What are the possible negative effects?

4
What do we mean by professional?
  • Dictionary definition
  • Classification definition
  • Positive education requirement
  • Study in a prescribed curriculum as the only way
    to prepare for the work
  • Demonstration of a particular body of knowledge
  • Certification or other credential programs

5
What do we mean by professional?
  • Eye of the beholder
  • We view ourselves as professionals with our
    individual constructs
  • Others may not because they define professional
    in other terms
  • Approach to the job
  • Responsiveness and proactivity
  • Willingness and ability to solve problems
  • Other attributes (e.g., ability to communicate,
    dedication)

6
What is the impact of not having a professional
series?
  • Lack of visibility in recruiting efforts
  • No defined career path
  • Grade levels perceived to be below those of
    acquisition counterparts
  • Grade levels below those of technical
    counterparts
  • Promotion on varying bases
  • Differing position expectations
  • Viewed as clerical or support function that
    can be contracted out

7
What is the impact of not having a professional
series?
  • But we have
  • a professional organization that brings together
    people with similar responsibilities across
    sectors
  • individuals that consider themselves grants
    professionals and have made significant
    contributions to advance grants management
  • organizations that recognize grants management as
    a specialty separate from other functions

8
What are the benefits of having a professional
series?
  • Obverse of not having one
  • Ability to recruit into a defined profession
  • Career ladders
  • Greater consistency in classification
  • Common core to definition of grants manager
  • Positive education requirement in certain
    disciplines (business, financial) would enhance
    ability to evaluate and monitor business aspects
    of grants
  • More effective stewardship

9
What issues will a professional series not
address?
  • A starting point, not a panacea
  • Acquisition professionals face many of the same
    issues even with a single, defined series
  • Personal
  • Understanding and approach
  • Range of skills and abilities beyond those
    affected by classification
  • Interpersonal
  • Interactions with program/technical staff
  • Communication and acceptance of function/message

10
What issues will a professional series not
address?
  • Organizational
  • Classification
  • Flexibility in use
  • Authorities
  • Program authorizations flow differently than
    authority to acquire goods and services
  • Organizational models, roles, and
    responsibilities
  • Separation/independence of functions
  • Resource availability
  • Culture
  • Advocacy

11
What are the possible negative effects?
  • Isolation from other functions
  • Need more of a business management (vice grants
    management) approach
  • Need to emphasize program knowledge
  • Reliance on status to justify positions taken
  • More visible target for consolidation/centralizati
    on and/or contracting (OMB Circular A-76)

12
What are the possible negative effects?
  • Emphasis on certain skills/abilities only
  • Make grants management more of a focused
    profession-generally business/financial
  • Make it difficult individuals with a variety of
    educational and experience backgrounds to enter
    the profession
  • A changing environment may require different
    education, experience, skills

13
Conclusion
  • This generation of grants managers needs to lay
    groundwork for next
  • A professional series would be only one part of
    that foundation and may not be possible without
    some greater definition of the field

14
Conclusion
  • Also need
  • A basic construct of knowledge, abilities,
    personal attributes
  • Clear statement of objectives of grant process
    and role of grants management professionals
  • Clarity in roles and responsibilities
  • Ability to integrate grants management construct
    with a variety of organizational models
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com