Title: Assessing the Students in Problem based, Project organized, Group situated Learning'
1Assessing the Students in Problem based
Project organized Group situated Learning.
University Teacher Training Course Aalborg
University/ Esbjerg 14.03.07Lone Krogh
(lkr_at_puc.aau.dk)
2Themes for the first introduction
- Structure and activities at the course
- Thoughts and pedagogy behind organization and
teachingforms - Action
3They say People learn
- 10 of what they read
- 20 of what they hear
- 30 of what they see
- 50 of what they see and hear
- 70 of what they talk over with others
- 80 of what they use and do in real life
- 95 of what they teach someone else
- William Glasser quoted by Association for
Supervision and Curriculum Department Guide 1988.
4More focus on teaching at Danish universities
- Globalisation
- Denmark is a knowledge society
- Focus on competences
- Employability mobility and lifelong learning
- Effectiveness in teaching and learning
- cost-benefit
- Students diversity - (age-culture-gender) and
demands
5This focus is supported by
- National and international evaluations
- eg. the Danish Evaluation Institute (EVA) and the
OECD 2004 - The Bologna Process (harmonising)
- Statements from
- the Danish Ministry of Science Education and
Innovation - 2006 - The Globalisation Council - 2006
6Some consequenses for the system and the staff
- New reforms and educational programmes (Bachelor
Candidate Master and continuing education)
changing laws - Distance education and learning programmes
- Subjects and knowledge are to be discussed
continuiously - The teachers role must be discussed changing
between præsentations and organizing methods for
the students learning processes - Kooperation with colleagues other institutions
(maybe) practisioners about teaching - Involvment of students in teaching and learning
processses (making them more responsible and
supporting their motivation)
7Challenges
- The academic teachers have to be proficient in
doing research and in teaching and in many
other thingsAND - The university has to create an organizaton that
supports the teachers in working professionally
8University teacher comptence profile
- Scientific qualifications
- Other professional qualifications
- Pedagogic and teaching qualifications
- Qualifications related to communication and
presentation (3rd leg) - (Qualifications in relation to management and
administration) - (Personal qualifications)
- (Handal 2002)
9Formal basis for teacher training courses in
Denmark wire defined
- The institution must ensure that during the
contracted employment term (the assistant
professor) is given responsibility for teaching
activities and must provide teacher education
supervision and advising to such an extent that a
written evaluation of the qualifications can be
provided upon completion of employment term. - (Circular on employment structure (Cirkulære om
stillingsstruktur) for higher education
institutions under the Danish Ministry of
Research and Technology September 2000) (1993
and 1997).
10Learningobjectives for the course.The
assistant professor should (on the basic of
knowledge and experiences)
- gain insight into and understanding of learning
theories - develop the ability to plan carry out and
develop suitable teaching and learning
activities while applying relevant theories - learn to identify students resources and to
initiate learning processes among a variety of
students both individually and in groups - become familiar with a variety of pedagogic tools
and methods including ICT supported teaching and
learning in order to apply the appropriate tools
in relation to different target groups - strengthen the insight into problem based project
supervision and the role of the supervisor in
order to realize the potential of PBL in
initiating and supporting the students group
processes
11Objectives (continued)
- gain knowledge and understanding of evaluation as
a developmental and guiding tool in order to
evaluate teaching programmes to assess the
progress of the students and consequently to be
able to develop and improve teaching practises - get experience in working systematically and
analytically with the teaching portfolio and with
self-evaluation - be inspired to continuously working with
development and improvement of teaching
activities with a view to different audiences
conditions and environments.
12So..
- The overall aims for you as participants are to
- develop into theoretically reflecting practicians
in teaching and supervision (vejledning) - practicians who will gain experiences in using
differentiating methods of teaching in supporting
the students in their learning processes and - develop increasing awareness of the various roles
and demands you are facing as researchers and as
teachers - awareness of your ressources and potentials to
solve the differentiating tasks in a professional
way
13Pegagogic principles for the course
- Focus on teaching and vejledningspractice
- Learning happen in action and in interaction
together with supervisors and/or colleagues in
the study-groups - Theories about teaching and learning are
integrated when necessary - Supervision and guidance by (experienced
supervisors and/or colleagues (peers)) - Self-evaluation analyses and reflections on
practice by - Use of teachingportfolio as a tool for
reflection and documentation on personal
experiences with the practice of teaching and
vejledning.
14The intended learning proces for you during the
course
- Starting point awareness of teaching and
vejlednings practices and then - Acquisition of new knowledge reflection
development and change of practice
15Themes in focus during the course (by readings
portfoliowork workshops supervision)
- The field of university pedagogy
- The professional university teacher role
- Students resources learning and competence
development - Teaching and evaluation methods (incl. IT)
- Problem based project work and vejledning
- Supervision and reflection
16Structure/activities
- The course comprises a work load of 175 work
hours 7 ECTS - Duration 12 months (March 2007 February 2008)
- Two modules
- Workshops from PUC
- Work with individual teaching-portfolio
through-out the course - Study groups (readings discussions and
reflections feedback on the working with
teaching-portfolio) - Each assistant professor is assigned two
supervisors (One appointed by PUC and one a
senior faculty member from participants
department appointed by the head of department). - Evaluation-statement from the supervisors
- Course certificate
17Modules (content)
18Intentions of course - the didactics
- The structure and pedagogy will in an exemplary
way offer the opportunity for the participants
to work with development and enhancement at
various levels and backgrounds and - reach the goal at different levels
- The quality of instruction cannot be raised by
odd tricks or by technical means alone. What is
needed is theoretical insight into learning and
teaching. - (Engeström 1994 p. 1)
19Learningmethods applied
- Seminars and workshops with use of præsentations
and discussions - Readings in studygroups
- Teachingportfolio
- Observation supervision and support
- Evaluation statement from supervisors (asistant
professors)
20Study-groups
- Readings are discussions in the study-groups
- Suggestions for work process
- Distribute the articles among the members of the
group - The individual present the studied material to
the group-members - The presentations are followed up by discussions
and reflections related to the practices of
teaching and vejledning
21The teaching-portfolio is a cornerstone at the
course
- A tool for facilitating reflection on
development in and documentation of the
teacherqualification process - Contains a collection of reflected documents
(evidence) - You start with the formulation of teaching
philosophy statements descriptions and
reflections on basic elements in teaching and
learning processes - a template to support the reflections is provided
- You formulate a pedagogic plan of action
- The basis for discussions supervision
(self-)evaluation throughout the course - The basis for the Supervisors evaluation
statement at the end of the course
22Supervision and guidance (p. 3 in the
Introduction)
- The PUC-supervisor is for ass. professors
contact-person throughout the course - The department-supervisor represents the
participants professional enviroment - Colleague (peer)supervision a more symmetrical
egalitarian co-operative relationship - The study group members study theories and
provide on-going mutual support and supervision
to each other
23Workshops
- 14 March 2007 - All day in Esbjerg General
introduction to professional didactics and
university pedagogy. Theories of learning
processes and the teaching portfolio work. Assoc.
professor Lone Krogh
- 7 - 8 May 2007 - 1 ½ day in Esbjerg. Learning
Teaching methods and reflections - Assoc.
professor Tina Bering Keiding - 23 August 2007 - all day in Aalborg. Teaching
feedback reflections. Professor Phil Race
Leeds Metropolitan University and Lone
Krogh - October 2007 - 2 days - in Esbjerg (date not
fixed) Vejledningsseminar. Professors Lise
Kofoed and Torben Rosenørn - November 2007 1 day - in Aalborg (date not
fixed). Evaluation and exams in higher
educationProfessor Per Lauvås Østfold
University College Norway
24Contact and information
- Lone Krogh head of the course lkr_at_puc.aau.dk
tlf. 9635 8007 - Ulla Burskov secretary ub_at_puc.aau.dk tlf.
9635 9095
25Information
- All documents concerning the course are made
available at - www.puc.aau.dk/esbjerg2007
- The documents may be guidelines programmes for
workshops articles præsentations from
workshops etc. Participants will be notified by
e-mail whenever new documents are available. - We keep in touch by e-mail so please remember to
advise the secretary if you change your e-mail
address
26Youll have a hard time believing you cannot
improve
- An associate professor from the natural
sciences 2006 - When I started the PUC course I had the feeling
that the teachers couldnt teach me anything
useful since I already been a (good if you ask
me -) teacher within the university for 7-8
years. Furthermore I was myself a student not
too long ago - so how difficult could it
be....One might even say I was a bit arrogant
towards this course. - And I was right. They couldnt teach me
anything!!
27Because!
- (as I learned on the course)
- teachers cannot teach a student anything. They
can only create a situation where the student has
the possibility to learn IF he/she is capable and
motivated. - In other words the only one that can teach me
anything is me!
28Therefore
- I would probably have ended up learning nothing
new if it hadnt been for the study-group. - At first we were all a bit defensive in the
group. But as time passed and we read some
literature we all started to realize that our own
teaching style could easily be improved. This led
to vivid discussions on our past experiences why
we did as we did and what we had learned. In
other words we started REFLECTING. For me this
was excellent. I became aware of why I was
teaching as I was what was good about it and
what could/should be improved. I think those of
us in the group who put a piece of our self
into the discussions all learned a great deal and
are better teachers today.
29My conclusions and recommendations
- The course is good if youre motivated
- The study-group is excellent for discussions and
reflections if and only if you are motivated and
willing to open up and recognize pros and cons of
your own teaching style - For the first time you have all the knowledge
support (from literature peers supervisors) and
time needed to prepare a lecture like you always
dreamt about.... - Try to capture one of your lectures on video and
see all of it (2x45min). Youll then have a hard
time believing you cannot improve . -