Stretching Scarce Resources: State Strategies to Design Effective, Affordable Benefit Packages - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Stretching Scarce Resources: State Strategies to Design Effective, Affordable Benefit Packages

Description:

Stretching Scarce Resources: State Strategies to Design Effective, Affordable Benefit Packages – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: johnm148
Learn more at: https://archive.ahrq.gov
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Stretching Scarce Resources: State Strategies to Design Effective, Affordable Benefit Packages


1
Stretching Scarce Resources State Strategies to
Design Effective, Affordable Benefit Packages
  • Anne Markus, J.D., Ph.D.
  • Senior Research Scientist
  • The George Washington University Medical Center

2
Definitions
  • Premium Set amount of dollars per defined
    payment period (usually monthly) paid to obtain
    health insurance coverage.
  • Cost-sharing Patient exposure to out-of-pocket
    costs associated with health service delivery.
    Includes
  • Deductible
  • Coinsurance
  • Copayment

3
Purposes of Cost-sharing
  • General reasons
  • Enticing families to be more cost conscious in
    seeking care
  • Fostering a sense of ownership/personal
    responsibility
  • Directing consumers toward more cost-effective
    care
  • Deterring unnecessary utilization
  • Raising revenues to reduce sponsor costs of
    health care coverage

4
Purposes of Cost-sharing (cont.)
  • Additional reasons for states
  • Making public health insurance programs aimed at
    the poor look more like private insurance
  • Limiting substitution and crowd-out of private
    insurance

5
Recent Trends
  • Private sector
  • No significant changes to contribution
    strategies, but changes to benefit structure
  • Medicaid/SCHIP
  • HIFA initiative
  • Medicare
  • Pharmacy Plus initiative

6
Cost-sharing Rules in Public Programs
  • Medicaid
  • Premiums prohibited
  • with some exceptions
  • Nominal cost-sharing allowed
  • with some exceptions
  • No overall cap specified
  • SCHIP
  • Premiums allowed
  • Cost-sharing allowed
  • Overall cap of 5 of family income
  • State employee benefit plans
  • Premiums allowed
  • Cost-sharing allowed
  • May or may not impose overall cap

7
Medicaid and SCHIP Waivers
  • Medicaid cost-sharing waivers
  • (1) inappropriate use of ER
  • (2) 2 year demonstration program
  • Section 1115 waivers
  • (1) waiver of Medicaid and/or SCHIP
    cost-sharing requirements as part of a 5-year
    demonstration program
  • (2) streamlined waiver process and increased
    flexibility to design cost-sharing rules under
    HIFA

8
Effect of Premiums
  • Premiums influence participation in insurance
    programs
  • As premiums increase, participation rates
    decrease

9
Effects of Cost-sharing
  • Use of services
  • Cost-sharing influences the use of services
  • As cost-sharing increases, use of services
    decreases
  • outpatient care
  • inpatient care
  • prescriptions
  • preventive services
  • emergency room
  • Health outcomes
  • Cost-sharing may have an effect on health
    outcomes
  • In general, cost-sharing has been found to have a
    minimal or no effect on health outcomes except
    for the poorest populations

10
Effect Across Population Groups
  • Research shows that cost-sharing has a deterrent
    effect across the board
  • children and adults
  • people who are healthy and people who have
    chronic conditions
  • rich and poor
  • Existing body of knowledge also suggests that
    cost-sharing may have a more pronounced negative
    effect on low income people
  • studies on premiums in state programs
  • non-Medicaid studies on cost-sharing
  • Medicaid studies on cost-sharing

11
SCHIP Experiences
  • All States with separate SCHIP programs have some
    form of cost-sharing
  • Research in this area thus far focuses on the
    effect of premiums on initial participation but
    also on continued participation in program
  • Anecdotal evidence also suggests that collecting
    and processing premiums and other cost-sharing
    contributions is administratively burdensome
    and/or not worth the cost

12
Implications
  • Income-related, sliding scale for premium and
    cost-sharing schedule
  • Low premiums
  • Limited cost-sharing
  • Broaden the definition of preventive services
    exempt from cost-sharing
  • Individuals with special needs

13
HIFA Cost-sharing Rules
  • Mandatory eligibility groups (e.g., all children
    up to 100 FPL) same rules as Medicaid
  • Optional eligibility groups (e.g., children
    beyond the mandatory eligibility levels) no
    cost-sharing rules specified other than an annual
    cap of 5 of family income for deductibles,
    copayments and coinsurance
  • Expansion eligibles (e.g., nondisabled single
    working age adults, childless couples) no
    cost-sharing rules specified

14
Examples of State Flexibility Under HIFA
  • Arizona (approved HIFA waiver)
  • Childless adults lt100 FPL same cost-sharing as
    Medicaid, i.e., 1-5 except prenatal care, EPSDT
    services, family planning
  • Parents of SCHIP and Medicaid children 100-200
    FPL same cost-sharing as SCHIP, i.e., family
    premiums up to 25 per month, 5 non-emergency
    use of emergency room, overall limit of 5 of
    annual family income
  • California (approved HIFA waiver)
  • Parents of SCHIP and Medicaid children lt200 FPL
    similar to cost-sharing under SCHIP, e.g.,
    monthly premiums of 10 or 20, copays
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com