The cognitive neuroscience of language comprehension - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

The cognitive neuroscience of language comprehension

Description:

Dolphins. Dogs. Apes. Orangutans. Gorillas. Chimpanzees. Bonobos ... Pink (semantic- correct) Red(semantic- syntactic) (Indefrey & Cutler, 2004) ERP studies ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:684
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: michaeldon
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The cognitive neuroscience of language comprehension


1
The cognitive neuroscience of language
comprehension
2
Uniqueness of language
  • Separates humans from other animals
  • Other unique human abilities have been found in
    other animals.
  • Tool use
  • Cooperation
  • Use of symbols
  • Theory of mind

3
Animal language studies
  • Parrots
  • Dolphins
  • Dogs
  • Apes
  • Orangutans
  • Gorillas
  • Chimpanzees
  • Bonobos

4
Chimpanzees
  • Several researchers have attempted to raise
    chimpanzees as a member of the family (e.g.,
    Kellog, Hayes).
  • Chimpanzee could learn to recognize more than 100
    words.
  • Chimpanzees are not able to produce sounds used
    in human language.

5
Bonobo language learning
  • Kanzi and Sue Savage-Rumbaugh

6
Language learning in Bonobos
  • Learned a few hundred lexigrams.
  • Also learned to comprehend some spoken English as
    well as a 2.5 year old child.

7
Lexical vs. grammatical ability in children
  • Lexical growth and grammatical ability strongly
    correlate (Bates and Goodman, 1997).

8
Subcomponents of language
  • Sound
  • Phonemes
  • Lexical access (semantics, word class of
    individual word,.
  • Results Using eye tracking very few regressive
    eye movements.

9
Classic model of language processing in the brain
  • Wernicke-Lichthiem-Geschwind model

10
Types of aphasia
  • Brocas aphasiadifficulty producing words
  • Wernickess aphasia difficulty comprehending
    words.
  • Conduction aphasia difficulty repeating words or
    correcting mistakes.
  • Global aphasia (transcortical aphasia)
    difficulty comprehending and producing words.

11
Brocas aphasia
  • The patient is talking about why he came to the
    hospital
  • Yes ... ah ... Monday .... ah .... Dad and Peter
    Hogan, and Dad .... ah .... hospital .... and ah
    .... Wednesday .... Wednesday nine o'clock and ah
    Thursday ... ten o'clock ah doctors ... two ....
    two .... an doctors and .... ah .... teeth ....
    yah .... And a doctor an girl .... and gums, an
    I.
  • From 'The Shattered Mind' by Howard Gardner.

12
Wernickes aphasia
  • "What brings you to the hospital? ... "Boy, I'm
    sweating, I'm awful nervous, you know, once in a
    while I get caught up, I can't mention the
    tarrripoi, a month ago, quite a little, I've done
    a lot well, I impose a lot, while, on the other
    hand, you know what I mean, I have to run around,
    look it over, trebbin and all that sort of
    stuff." ... "Thank you, Mr. Grogan. I want to ask
    you a few -" "Oh, sure, go ahead, any old think
    you want. If I could I would. Oh, I'm taking the
    word the wrong way to say, all of the barbers
    here whenever they stop you it's going around and
    around, if you know what I mean, that is tying
    and tying for repucer, recuperation, well, we
    were trying the best that we could while another
    time it was with the beds over there the same
    thing ..."
  • From 'The Shattered Mind' by Howard Gardner.

13
Modifications to W-G model
  • Beyond the word level
  • Brocas aphasics often have problems in
    comprehension of syntactically complex sentences.
  • Reexamination of neuropsychological evidence

14
Brocas aphasics and syntactic complexity
  • The brown horse is chased by the white dog.
    (Caramazza Zurif, 1976)
  • The brown horse chased the white dog.
  • (Schwartz, Saffran, Marin, 1980).

15
Brocas aphasia
  • Two possibilities to explain syntactic deficits
  • Loss of syntactic knowledge?
  • Inability to access syntactic knowledge?

16
Difficulty accessing syntactic knowledge
  • Brocas aggramatic aphasics can judge
    grammaticality of sentences.
  • The brown dog chase the white horse.
  • The brown dog chases the white horse.

17
Neuropsychological evidence
  • Original model made before modern neuroimaging
    technology
  • CAT scanning of Brocas patient Tans brain
    shows that lesion includes BA 44,45,47, anterior
    insula, basal ganglia, and white matter tracts.

18
Neuropsychological studies
  • Behavior based studies
  • Lesions not including Brocas area can produce
    Brocas aphasia.
  • Lesion based studies
  • Patients with lesions in Brocas area without
    Brocas aphasia.
  • Voxel-based lesion symptom mapping (Bates et al.,
    2003)

19
Dronkers et al. (2004) VLSM study
  • Tested 64 LH lesion patients in sentence
    comprehension battery (CYCLE-R) and compared
    results with RH lesion, and older control
    subjects.

20
Behavioral stimuli
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
Summary of VLSM mapping results
  • 5 general areas involved in sentence processing
  • Medial temporal gyrus
  • Anterior BA22
  • Superior temporal sulcus/BA39
  • BA46
  • BA47
  • Neither Wernickes nor Brocas area implicated.

24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
Summary of Dronkers et al. (2004)
  • Medial temporal gyrus important for word level
    comprehension.
  • Anterior BA22 important for simple syntax, and
    basic morphosyntax.
  • Frontal areas important for working memory used
    during sentence comprehension.
  • Angular gyrus needed for verbal short term memory
    and auditory rehearsal.

27
Neuroimaging studies
  • Individual word level
  • Sentence level semantics
  • Sentence level syntax

28
Semantics
  • Number of propositions in a sentence (Caplan et
    al., 1998) (bilateral superior and medial
    temporal lobes)
  • Jabberwocky versus sentences with content
  • English Betsy can eat the apple at this park.
  • Jabberywocky Bapfa can eeg the agger at this
    pilt.
  • (source Neville lab, University of Oregon)
  • Detection of semantic errors compared to
    detection of other errors

29
Examples of sentence conditions used in
Friederici et al. (2003).
  • Correct condition
  • Das Hemd wurde gebügelt
  • The shirt was ironed
  • Syntactic violation condition
  • Die Bluse wurde am gebügelt
  • The blouse was on ironed
  • Semantic violation condition
  • Das Gewitter wurde gebügelt
  • The thunderstorm was ironed
  • Correct filler condition
  • Der Rock wurde am Freitag gebügelt
  • The skirt was on Friday ironed

30
(No Transcript)
31
Syntax
  • Kaan and Swaab (2002) review neural basis of
    syntax.
  • Complex versus simple sentences.
  • Simple The child spilled the juice that stained
    the rug.
  • Complex The juice that the child spilled stained
    the rug.
  • Sentences compared to word lists.
  • Jabberwocky versus pseudoword lists.
  • Detection of syntactic errors.

32
Complex versus simple sentences
Jabberwocky versus pseudoword lists
(Indefrey Cutler, 2004)
Error detection
Sentences versus word lists
Black (syntax-correct) Blue(syntax-semantics) Gree
n(syntax-other) Pink (semantic-
correct) Red(semantic- syntactic)
33
ERP studies
  • Semantics
  • N400
  • Syntax
  • LAN
  • P600/SPS

34
N400
  • Kutas and Federmeir (2000)

35
N400 (2)
36
(No Transcript)
37
Summary
  • The Wernicke-Geschwind model is being replaced by
    new models.
  • New models focus on both neural basis and timing
    of language comprehension, and have moved beyond
    simplistic divisions of comprehension/production.
  • rent priorities on cues for sentence
    comprehension.
  • In Italian inflectional morphology word order
    ...
  • In English word order inflectional morphology...
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com