Suppression of Deep Convection by the Saharan Air Layer (SAL) over the Tropical North Atlantic - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Suppression of Deep Convection by the Saharan Air Layer (SAL) over the Tropical North Atlantic

Description:

Suppression of Deep Convection by the Saharan Air Layer (SAL) over the Tropical North Atlantic ... Andrew E. Dessler1, Peter Colarco2. 1ESSIC, University of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:111
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: sunw7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Suppression of Deep Convection by the Saharan Air Layer (SAL) over the Tropical North Atlantic


1
Suppression of Deep Convection by the Saharan Air
Layer (SAL) over the Tropical North Atlantic Sun
Wong1, Andrew E. Dessler1, Peter Colarco2 1ESSIC,
University of Maryland, College Park 2Goddard
Space Flight Center, Maryland, Greenbelt March
24, 2005 (MODIS Meeting)
2
Easterlies
5 km
Saharan Air Layer Warm Dry Dusty
0.9 km
Cool, moist
Africa
Atlantic
3
Why does the SAL concern us?
  • Evidence has shown linkage between the SAL and
    the tropical cyclone (TC) activity
  • The SAL is associated with the transport and
    distribution of dust over Atlantic. Dust can
    cool the surface and warm the atmosphere (Global
    mean forcing at surface from dust 0.96 Wm-2)

4
Purposes
  • Using NASAs satellite data (including MODIS) to
    study the thermodynamic structure of the SAL
  • Evaluate simulation of the SAL by NASAs model
    (fvGCM) using the satellite data
  • Understanding the detailed physics using the
    model

5
Data Resources
  • MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer
    (MODIS) aerosol optical thickness (AOT,0.55 µm,
    MOD04 level-2 product from Terra)
  • Brightness T (11 µm, MOD06 level-2 product)
  • NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis T, RH (2.52.5)
  • Time Daily instantaneous samples at around noon
    for Aug-Sep 2002
  • Region 40-20W, 10-20N

6
Monthly Mean AOT
7
For each grid and each day in the region
1
  • Grid-averaged AOT

10 km
AOT
  • BT histogram
  • Total BT pixels no. gt 100

1
BT
1 km
Range 190-300 K Bin width 10 K
8
Regional Statistics for Aug-Sep 2002
0-0.3
0.9-3
9
Composites of T Anomaly Profiles
0.9-3
0.3-0.5
0.3-0.5
0.5-0.7
0.7-0.9
0.7-0.9
0.5-0.7
10
CAPE and Convection Barrier
LNB
A Energy released in convection B Convection
barrier CAPE A B
Altitude
A
Lifted LFC
SAL T
B
Air parcel T
LFC
Non-SAL T
LCL
Virtual Temperature
11
Summary for East Atlantic
AOT Range Ave. AOT Conv. Barrier (m2/s2) P(BTlt230 K) P(BTlt250 K)
0-0.3 0.3-0.5 0.5-0.7 0.7-0.9 0.9-3 0.21 0.41 0.60 0.79 1.21 6.65 16.10 27.84 37.63 54.27 1.05 0.19 0.20 0.00 0.00 2.70 1.10 1.04 0.15 0.05
12
AOT EOF-1
13
T at 850 hPa EOF-1
14
Conclusion
  • The SAL is associated with a suppression of deep
    convection. Frequency of clouds with BT less
    than 250 K is largely reduced
  • The SAL suppresses deep convection by lifting the
    LCL (less moisture), LFC (warmer temperature),
    and strengthening the convection barrier

15
FVGCM NCEP/NCAR Peter Colarco
16
Monthly Mean AOT and Air-Mass Convergence
17
GOES SAL Tracking Imagery, BT11-BT12 (Dunion and
Velden, 2004)
18
GPS Moisture Sounding Composites (Dunion and
Velden, 2004)
19
MODIS Satellite True Color Image (August 11, 2002)
20
For each grid and each day in the region
1
  • Grid-averaged AOT

10 km
AOT
1
21
Regional Statistics for Aug-Sep 2002
East Atlantic (Region 1)
AOT P(BTlt230 K) in
0-0.3 0.3-0.5 0.5-0.7 0.7-0.9 0.9-3.0 1.05 0.19 0.20 0.00 0.00
22
Summary for Central Atlantic
AOT Range Ave. AOT Conv. Barrier (m2/s2) P(BTlt230 K) P(BTlt250 K)
0-0.3 0.3-0.5 0.5-0.7 0.7-0.9 0.21 0.40 0.59 0.78 6.04 11.48 15.42 12.34 0.81 0.51 0.13 0.18 2.37 2.27 0.90 1.42
23
Composites of q Anomaly Profiles
24
Composites of T Anomaly Profiles
0.9-3
0.3-0.5
0.5-0.7

0.7-0.9
25
CAPE and Convection Barrier
LNB
A Energy released in convection B Convection
barrier CAPE A B
Altitude
A
B
Air parcel T
LFC
Environmental T
LCL
Virtual Temperature
26
Discussion and Future Direction
  • How about the wind shear at the southern border
    of the SAL?
  • Are dust and warm anomalies really advected
    coherently?
  • The quality of NCEP/NCAR reanalysis? (Especially
    moisture!!!)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com