Regional Economic Integration - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Regional Economic Integration

Description:

The European Community (EC) was established (The forerunner of the EU) 12 ... The forerunner of the EU was the European Coal and Steel Community, which had ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1429
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: Ale8239
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Regional Economic Integration


1
Lecture 11
  • Regional Economic Integration

2
Outline
  • Introduction
  • Level of Economic Integration
  • The Case for Regional Integration
  • Impediments to Integration
  • European Union (EU)
  • Regional Economic Integration in the America
  • Regional Economic Integration in Asia
  • Managerial Implications

3
A. Introduction
  • Regional Economic Integration
  • Agreements among countries in a geographical
    region to reduce, and ultimately remove, tariff
    and non-tariff barriers to the free flow of
    goods, services, and factors of production among
    each other
  • Examples
  • EU (European Union)
  • NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement)
  • APEC (Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation)
  • Regional economic integration good or bad?

4
B. Level of Economic Integration
  • 5 types of economic integration
  • Free Trade Area
  • Customs Union
  • Common Market
  • Economic Union
  • Political Union

5
B. Level of Economic Integration
  • Free Trade Area
  • All barriers to the trade of goods and services
    among members are removed
  • Each member country can determine its own trade
    policies with regard to non-member countries
  • Examples
  • EFTA (European Free Trade Association)
  • Includes Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and
    Switzerland
  • NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement)
  • Includes US, Canada and Mexico

6
B. Level of Economic Integration
  • Customs Union
  • Eliminates trade barriers between members
  • Adopts a common external trade policy
  • Example Andean Community
  • Includes Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru and
    Venezuela
  • Establishes free trade among member countries and
    imposes a common external tariff (5-20) on
    products imported from outside

7
B. Level of Economic Integration
  • Common Market
  • Has no barriers to trade between members
  • Has common external trade policy
  • Allows factors of production to move freely among
    members
  • Example MERCOSUR
  • Includes Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay
  • Aims to eventually establish itself as a common
    market
  • Refer to article Mercosur

8
B. Level of Economic Integration
  • Economic Union
  • Allows free flow of products and factors of
    production between members
  • Has common external trade policy
  • Has common currency
  • Harmonization of members tax rates
  • Has common fiscal and monetary policy
  • Example European Union
  • Consists of 25 European countries
  • However, not all members adopted the euro
    (currency of the EU) and difference in tax rates
    across countries still remains

9
B. Level of Economic Integration
  • Political Union
  • The move towards economic union raises the issue
    of
  • Political Union coordinates the economic, social
    and foreign policy of the member states
  • EU is on the road towards at least partial
    political union
  • Example European Parliament is elected by
    citizens of the EU countries

how to make a coordinating bureaucracy
accountable to the citizens of member nations
10
C. The Case for Regional Integration
  • Economic case for integration
  • Stimulates economic growth in countries
  • Increases FDI and world production
  • Countries specialize in production of those goods
    and services which they could produce most
    efficiently
  • Achieves additional gains from free trade beyond
    the international agreements such as WTO

11
C. The Case for Regional Integration
  • Political case for integration
  • Economic interdependence creates incentives for
    political cooperation ? reduces potential for
    violent confrontation
  • Example
  • After World War II, the European nation-states
    were no longer large enough to hold their own in
    world markets and world politics
  • An united Europe was needed to deal with the
    United States and the politically alien Soviet
    Union
  • The European Community (EC) was established (The
    forerunner of the EU)

12
D. Impediments to Integration
  • Integration is hard to achieve and sustain for 2
    reasons
  • Nation may benefit but groups within countries
  • may be hurt
  • Example Under NAFTA, Canadian and US firms
  • moved production to Mexico
  • Potential loss of sovereignty and control over
  • domestic issues
  • Example Great Britain remained using its
    British
  • currency instead of the euro

13
D. Impediments to Integration
  • Whether regional integration is in the economic
    interests of the participants depends upon the
    extent of trade creation as opposed to trade
    diversion

Trade creation occurs when low cost producers
within the free trade area replace high cost
domestic producers
Trade diversion occurs when higher cost suppliers
within the free trade area replace lower cost
external suppliers outside the free trade area
Refer to article Trade Diversion in Action The
EU-Mexican Free-Trade Agreement
14
E. Regional Economic Integration in Europe
  • There are two trading blocks in Europe
  • The European Union (EU)
  • The European Free Trade Association
  • The forerunner of the EU was the European Coal
    and Steel Community, which had the goal of
    removing barriers to trade in coal, iron, steel,
    and scrap metal formed in 1951

15
E. Regional Economic Integration in Europe
  • After 1st of January 2002, Euro notes and coins
    were issued and the national currencies were
    taken out of circulation
  • Benefits of adoption of the single currency
  • Savings (e.g. hedging costs) obtained from
    handling a single currency
  • Easy to compare prices across Europe
  • Forces improvement in efficiency and reduction of
    production costs
  • Gives a strong boost to the development of highly
    liquid pan-European capital market
  • The development of a pan-European euro
    denominated capital market increases the range of
    investment options open both to individuals and
    institutions

16
E. Regional Economic Integration in Europe
  • Costs
  • Countries could lose control over monetary policy
  • European Central Bank sets interest rates and
    determines monetary policy across the euro zone
  • EU is not an optimal currency area because
    country economies are very different
  • A common monetary policy ? interest rates are too
    high for depressed regions and too low for
    booming regions
  • Fiscal transfers from prosperous regions to
    depressed regions may occur

17
E. Regional Economic Integration in Europe
  • A single currency should follow, not precede,
    political union
  • The Euro will unleash enormous pressures for tax
    harmonization and fiscal transfers. Both policies
    cannot be pursued without the appropriate
    political structure
  • Strong Euro (2005) makes it harder for Euro zone
    exporters to sell their goods
  • Examples
  • Increasing Competition in the European Automobile
    Market (Global Business Today P.303-304)
  • Refer to video shown in class 21000DVD

18
F. Regional Economic Integration in the Americas
  • Regional economic integration is on the rise in
    the Americas

NAFTA
Andean Community
MERCOSUR
19
F. Regional Economic Integration in the Americas
  • North American Free Trade Agreement
  • NAFTA was enforced since January, 1994
  • There are 3 members US, Canada and Mexico
  • The agreement is over a 10-year period and the
    aim is to reduce tariffs for 99 of goods traded

Application of national environmental standards
Removal of many barriers on cross border flow of
services
  • Removal of restrictions on
  • FDI except in certain sectors
  • Example Mexican railway and
  • energy (Global Business Today
  • P.290)

Protection of intellectual property rights
Establishment of commission to police violations
20
F. Regional Economic Integration in the Americas
  • Benefits
  • Enlarged and productive
  • regional base
  • Cost saving for US Canadian
  • firms that move production to
  • Mexico
  • Mexico gets investment and
  • employment
  • Increased Mexican income
  • to buy US/Canada goods
  • Demand for goods increases
  • jobs
  • Consumers get lower prices
  • Costs
  • ? Loss of jobs to Mexico
  • Mexican firms have to
  • compete against efficient
  • US/Canada firms, while
  • Mexican firms become
  • more efficient in long-run
  • ? Environmental degradation
  • Loss of national
  • sovereignty

21
F. Regional Economic Integration in the Americas
  • North American Free Trade Agreement
  • Examples
  • NAFTA and the U.S Textile Industry (Global
    Business Today P.278-279)
  • Refer to article Estimating Trade and Employment
    Effects of Trade Agreements
  • Andean Pact is the agreement between
  • Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Venezuela
  • MERCOSUR is the major Latin American trade
    agreement between
  • Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay

22
G. Regional Economic Integration in Asia
  • ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations)
  • Created in 1967
  • Aims to achieve free trade among member countries
  • Aims to achieve cooperation in member countries
    industrial policies
  • Consists of
  • Brunei, Indonesia, Laos, Cambodia, Malaysia, the
    Philippines, Myanmar, Singapore, Thailand and
    Vietnam (10 members)
  • Refer to article A Tango Speeds Asean
    Integration

23
G. Regional Economic Integration in Asia
  • APEC (Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation)
  • Founded in 1990
  • Promotes open trade and practical economic
    cooperation
  • Promotes a sense of community
  • Consists of 21 members
  • Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, People's
    Republic of China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan,
    Republic of Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand,
    Papua New Guinea, Peru, Philippines, Russia,
    Singapore, Chinese Taipei, Thailand, United
    States, Vietnam

24
H. Managerial Implications
  • Opportunities
  • Creation of a single market offers significant
    opportunities because
  • markets that were formerly protected from foreign
    competition are opened
  • MNEs can benefit from the free movement of goods
    across borders, the harmonization of product
    standards, and the simplification of tax regimes
  • by centralizing production in locations where the
    mix of factor costs and skills is optimal
  • ? the MNEs can realize cost economies
  • by specialization and shipping of goods between
    locations
  • ? a more efficient web of operations can be
    created

25
H. Managerial Implications
  • Threats
  • The business environment within each single
    market will become more competitive
  • A further threat to non-EU and/or non-North
    American firms arises from
  • the likely long-term improvements in the
    competitive position of many European and North
    American companies
  • A final threat to firms outside of trading areas
    is the threat of being shut out of the single
    market by the creation of a trade fortress
  • Reference
  • Global Business Today P.299-301
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com