Exploring Measurement Issues: Sex, Gender and Diversity Analyses of Tobacco Use Instruments - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Exploring Measurement Issues: Sex, Gender and Diversity Analyses of Tobacco Use Instruments

Description:

Lindsay Richardson, Lorraine Greaves, Natasha Jategaonkar, Ann Pederson, Ethel ... Lindsay Richardson; Lorraine Greaves; Natasha Jategaonkar; Kirsten Bell; Ann ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:176
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: iceber
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Exploring Measurement Issues: Sex, Gender and Diversity Analyses of Tobacco Use Instruments


1
Exploring Measurement Issues Sex, Gender and
Diversity Analyses of Tobacco Use Instruments
  • Lindsay Richardson, Lorraine Greaves, Natasha
    Jategaonkar, Ann Pederson, Ethel Tungohan,
    Kirsten Bell

2
History of the Fagerstrom Instruments
  • The Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire (FTQ) was
    developed and validated by Karl Fagerstrom in
    1978
  • Eight question survey
  • Has spawned several modified versions including
    the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence

3
Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence
  • The FTND was developed and validated by reducing
    the FTQ to six questions (Heatherton, 1991)
  • Although the FTND appears to be a valid tool for
    various sub-populations, many studies have failed
    to sex-disaggregate their results
  • Sex and gender influence tobacco use and
    dependency (McLellan, Kaufman, 2006 Greaves,
    Jategaonkar, Sanchez, 2006).

4
FTND Questionnaire
  • How soon after you wake up do you smoke your
    first cigarette?
  • Do you find it difficult to refrain from smoking
    in places where it is forbidden?
  • Which cigarette would you hate most to give up?
  • How many cigarettes per day do you smoke?
  • Do you smoke more frequently during the first
    hours after awakening than during the rest of the
    day?
  • Do you smoke even if you are so ill that you are
    in bed most of the day?

5
Purpose
  • The purpose of this paper is to conduct a sex and
    gender analysis (SGBA) of the Fagerstrom Test for
    Nicotine Dependence (FTND) to explore potential
    biases within the instruments, provide
    recommendations regarding the interpretation of
    data collected using them, and improve future
    versions.

6
Sex and Gender Analysis
  • Is an approach to research and evaluation which
    systematically inquires about biological
    (sex-based) and sociocultural (gender-based)
    differences between women and men, boys and
    girls, without presuming the nature of any
    differences that may exist. (Spitzer, 2006)
  • Using such an approach helps to reduce bias
    throughout the research process and can further
    our understanding of how sex and gender influence
    tobacco dependence (Health Canada, 2003)

7
Methods
  • Literature Search examined sex and gender
    differences in nicotine dependence
  • Literature selection was based on articles that
    would specifically support and highlight the
    impact of sex and gender on nicotine dependence.
  • Analysis was based on 65 articles

8
Sex Differences
  • Due to underlying sex differences in lung anatomy
    and physiology, women experience different
    development of lung disease than men (Mennecier,
    Lebitasy, Moreau, Hedelin, Purohit, Galichet, et
    al., 2003).
  • Consuming the same number of cigarettes produces
    higher relative risk for cardiovascular disease
    development among women than men (Mustonen et
    al., 2005).
  • Females metabolize nicotine and cotinine faster
    than males (Benowitz et al., 2006).

9
Sex Differences and FTND
  • Sex-differences raise questions about whether the
    measure How many cigarettes a day do you smoke?
    (FTND Q4), is an effective markers of dependence
    in women in comparison to men.
  • Although females tend to smoke fewer cigarettes
    than males per day they may nevertheless be
    heavily nicotine dependent despite achieving
    low dependency scores on the FTND.

10
Genetic Differences in Nicotine Metabolism
  • Growing evidence of genetic differences in the
    metabolism of nicotine across diverse populations
    (Mustonen et al., 2005 Daza, Cofta-Woerpel,
    Mazas, Fouladi, Cinciprini, Gritz, et al., 2006
    Henningfield, 1990 Berlin et al., 2003).
  • African Americans metabolize nicotine more slowly
    than Whites, blood nicotine levels among African
    Americans may therefore be relatively equivalent
    to Whites, despite smoking fewer cigarettes per
    day on average (Mustonen et al., 2005 Daza et
    al., 2006).
  • African Americans are more likely to smoke
    menthol cigarettes, which produce a cooling
    effect that can alter inhalation patterns and
    lead to greater smoke/nicotine dependence
    (Mustonen et al., 2005 Daza et al., 2006).

11
Genetic Differences in Nicotine Metabolism
Continued
  • African American smokers tend to smoke more of
    each cigarette and longer cigarettes, despite
    smoking fewer total millimeters of cigarettes per
    day (Clark, Gautam, Hlaing, and Gerson, 1996).
  • Questions regarding the number of cigarettes
    smoked per day (e.g., FTQ Q4, FTND Q4) may not
    accurately reflect dependence because of subtle
    genetic and/or social factors such as a
    preference for different types of cigarettes
    (Mustonen et al., 2005 Daza et al., 2006 Clark
    et al., 1996).

12
Gender Differences Work Roles Smoking Patterns
  • Gendered roles and responsibilities have an
    impact on when they smoke, how often they smoke
    and where they smoke.
  • Gendered work roles and responsibilities may also
    influence which cigarette of the day is most
    satisfying (FTND Q3), how soon after wakening the
    first cigarette is smoked, or when more
    cigarettes are smoked (FTND Q5).

13
Gender Differences Reasons for Smoking
  • Traditional gender roles create expectations
    about gender-appropriate behavior which can
    influence smoking uptake, maintenance and
    cessation (Waldron, 2006 Etter, Prokhorov, and
    Perneger, 2002).
  • Gender differences in smoking patterns carry on
    into adulthood.
  • Gendered differences in tobacco use have
    implications for questions outlined by the FTND
    (Example FTND Q4)

14
Diversity and FTND
  • Occupation and socio-economic status (SES) also
    likely influence smoking patterns.
  • White-collar workers are more likely to work in
    settings that have smoking restrictions than
    blue-collar workers (Emmons et al., 2000).
  • This could influence the number of cigarettes
    smoked per day (FTND Q4) and when the majority of
    cigarettes are smoked (FTND Q5).

15
Diversity and FTND Continued
  • Class bias present in FTND Q2 Do you find it
    difficult to refrain from smoking in places where
    it is forbidden, such as the library, theatre, or
    doctors' office?
  • Access to the cultural capital is often
    class-based (Black, 2003 Prior, 2005 Bourdieu,
    2002).
  • The bias of this FTND question undermines its
    validity

16
Measurement Issues and Other Tobacco Use
Instruments
  • Improving health surveillance in Canada is a
    vital aspect of upgrading the countrys overall
    health infrastructure (Umphrey, Kendall,
    MacNeill, 2001).
  • Health surveillance systems present
    population-based data for a wide range of health
    outcomes by providing demographic portraits of
    health, a means to detect temporal changes in
    health factors, and information on associations
    between variables (Umphrey et al., 2001).
  • Findings from national surveys are widely used to
    guide the development of health policies and
    programs.

17
Measurement Issues and Other Tobacco Use
Instruments Continued
  • Findings from this analysis raise questions about
    the utility of other tobacco use instruments such
    as the Canadian Tobacco Monitoring Survey (CTUMS)
  • How might sex, gender and diversity, influence
    responses to questions outlined by surveillance
    instruments?
  • How might issues of sex, gender and diversity be
    taken into account in the interpretation of data
    collected from surveillance instruments?
  • How might elements of gender and diversity impact
    participation in surveys?
  • How can questions on surveillance instruments be
    revised to provide a more accurate survey of
    tobacco use in Canada amongst all populations?

18
Discussion
  • A fundamental problem with the FTND is that it
    fails to consider the variety of factors which
    influence nicotine dependence.
  • In light of the expanding evidence acknowledging
    the variety of factors which influence nicotine
    dependence, sophisticated multi-dimensional
    instruments are being created.

19
Discussion Continued
  • Failing to consider how sex and gender influence
    respondents answers to tobacco use
    questionnaires has serious implications for the
    diagnosis and treatment of nicotine dependence.  
  • It is essential that other tobacco use
    instruments consider the impact of sex, gender
    and diversity to ensure that their findings are
    relevant to all populations.

20
Recommendations
  • Further research is needed to examine the
    intersections of nicotine dependence since
    accurately assessing dependence is integral to
    effective treatment
  • It is vital that self report measures of nicotine
    dependence and other tobacco use instruments be
    made sensitive to the distinct biological and
    social experiences of women and men
  • Important that health care professional and
    individuals who administer these tests and
    interpret their results are aware of the
    limitations of existing instruments.

21
Journal of Smoking Cessation
  • Please look for an upcoming article based on this
    presentation
  • Lindsay Richardson Lorraine Greaves Natasha
    Jategaonkar Kirsten Bell Ann Pederson Ethel
    Tungohan. (in press). Rethinking an Assessment of
    Nicotine Dependence A Sex, Gender and Diversity
    Evaluation of the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine
    Dependence. Journal of Smoking Cessation.

22
Questions?
  • British Columbia Centre of Excellence for Womens
    Health (www.bccewh.bc.ca)
  • Lindsay Richardson
  • Tobacco Research Coordinator
  • lrichardson_at_cw.bc.ca

23
Acknowledgements
  • Funded by the Canadian Institute for Health
    Research ICEBERGS project
  • The British Columbia Centre of Excellence of
    Women's Health and its activities and products
    have been made possible through a financial
    contribution from Health Canada
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com