Quantum Noise of Resonant Cooper Pair Tunneling - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Quantum Noise of Resonant Cooper Pair Tunneling

Description:

Q:What characterizes an 'ideal' quantum detector? (cond-mat/0211001) ... (Glazman, Lesovik, Khmelnitskii & Shekhter, 1988) 4. 2. 2. 4. 0.2. 0.4. 0.6. 0.8. 1. T. e - e0 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:47
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: aash71
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Quantum Noise of Resonant Cooper Pair Tunneling


1
Mesoscopic Detectors and the Quantum Limit
(cond-mat/0211001)
A. A. Clerk, S. M. Girvin, and A. D.
StoneDepartments of Applied Physics and
Physics,Yale University
(and many discussions with M. Devoret R.
Schoelkopf)
QWhat characterizes an ideal quantum detector?
2
Generic Weakly-Coupled Detector
3
The Quantum Limit of Detection
Quantum limit the best you can do is measure as
fast as you dephase
  • Measurement? Need
    distinguishable from
  • What symmetries/properties must an arbitrary
    detector possess to reach the quantum limit?

4
Why care about the quantum limit?
  • Minimum Noise Energy in Amplifiers (Caves
    Clarke Devoret Schoelkopf)
  • Minimum power associated with Vnoise?

5
How to get to the Quantum Limit
A.C., Girvin Stone, cond-mat/0211001Averin,
cond-mat/0301524
  • Now, we have

6
What does it mean?
  • To reach the quantum limit, there should be no
    unused information in the detector

Mesoscopic Scattering Detector (Pilgram
Buttiker AC, Girvin Stone)
mL
mR
7
What does it mean?
  • To reach the quantum limit, there should be no
    unused information in the detector

Mesoscopic Scattering Detector (Pilgram
Buttiker AC, Girvin Stone)
mL
mR
Transmission probability depends on qubit
8
The Proportionality Condition
  • Need

Not usual symmetries!
9
Transmission Amplitude Condition
Ensures that no information is lost when
averaging over energy
1)
versus
2)
10
The Ideal Transmission Amplitude
Necessary energy dependence to be at the quantum
limit Corresponds to a real system-- the
adiabatic quantum point contact! (Glazman,
Lesovik, Khmelnitskii Shekhter, 1988)
T
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
e - e0
-
4
-
2
2
4
11
Information and Fluctuations
Reaching quantum limit no wasted information
  • No information lost in phase changes
  • No information lost when energy averaging

Look at charge fluctuations
12
Measurement Rate for Phase Experiment
t
r
13
Information and Fluctuations (2)
Reaching quantum limit no wasted information
Can connect charge fluctuations to information in
more complex cases
1. Multiple Channels
Extra terms due to channel structure
2. Normal-Superconducting Detector
Gmeas for phase experiment
Gmeas for current experiment
14
Partially Coherent Detectors
  • What is the effect of adding dephasing to the
    mesoscopic scattering detector? Look at a
    resonant-level model
  • Symmetric coupling to leads ? no information in
    relative phase

mL
mR
?
I? 0
  • Assume dephasing due to an additional voltage
    probe (Buttiker)

R
L
15
Partially Coherent Detectors
  • Reducing the coherence of the detector enhances
    charge fluctuations total accessible information
    is increased
  • A resulting departure from the quantum limit

Charge Noise (SQ)
16
Conclusions
  • Reaching the quantum limit requires that there
    be no wasted information in the detector can
    make this condition precise.
  • Looking at information provides a new way to
    look at mesoscopic systems
  • New symmetry conditions
  • New way to view fluctuations
  • Reducing detector coherence enhances charge
    fluctuations, leads to a departure from the
    quantum limit
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com