Title: Establishing aLunar Resource Base Beginning the renewed exploration of space
1Establishing aLunar Resource Base Beginning the
renewed exploration of space
- To
- 6th Annual Space Resources Round Table
- November 2004
- Hubert P. Davis Dr. Ted Talay
- (830) 935-2743
- hudavis_at_gvtc.com
2Space Exploration is a Renewed Goal of this Nation
- How?
- When?
- What must we invest?
- What are the benefits?
3The Transportation Elements
Aquila Heavy-lift 56 mt to orbit Derived from
STS
and EELV elements Ready in 2010
Reusable Space Stage RSS Derived From EELV Up
per
Stage Many applications
Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV) - Versions for
Crew Transfer
to L1 and Lunar Surface
Lunar Vehicle Reusable - Landing Cargo Crew
4Mission Scenario
- Gateport Facility established at L-1 using Aquila
RSS launches
- 80-ton Lunar Resource Base established at South
Pole of Moon
- Initial propellant deliveries from Earth soon
replaced entirely by lunar-produced propellants
assumes that lunar ice is confirmed and is
recoverable.
5L-1 Libration Point Marshalling Yard
- A place in space to gather resources from Earth
for assembly, propellant loading and dispatch to
the lunar surface for the purposes of building
and operating a resource base thus is built
first - A place to assemble and test the Lunar Vehicle,
propelled by 2 RSS stages with landing gear and
other systems delivered to L-1 separately
- A way station for the crews going to the lunar
base to change steeds for descent, to rest and
to return to Earth but need not be permanently
occupied. - A place for storage of lunar-produced propellants
using expended RSS propellant tanks
- Will make heavy use of robotic devices, derived
from those now in use on ISS supervised from
Earth.
6Results of Simulation
- L-1 Marshalling Yard delivered by five Aquila
launches
- 80 ton Lunar Resource Base is delivered to L-1 by
another five Aquila launches, re-packaged at L-1
- Two other launches required for Crew Exploration
Vehicle crew
- LRB placed near South Pole with 3 flights of the
Lunar Vehicle, assisted by one 6-person crew
visit to the Moon the design driver mission, as
its return propellant must be sent down to the
Moon! - These four lunar landings require delivery to L-1
of 515 tons of propellants requiring 32 Aquila
flights
- Since these propellants are inexpensive payloads
and hence low risk, perhaps we can contract their
delivery to L-1 to a commercial launch provider
7 Results of Simulation
- Once the LRB is functional producing
propellants, no further propellant deliveries are
required including those needed for other space
exploration missions. - Departure from L-1 greatly eases the burden of
such future missions
- Departure from L-1 provides a safe place to begin
use of nuclear propulsion for fast trips to Mars
and
- For example, we can fly dual missions to Mars,
with over 40 mass margins, for the same mass in
LEO it will take to depart from LEO with one Mars
spacecraft - Or, a single stretched stage can send 110 tons
onto a trans-Mars trajectory or up to 2.6 tons
to over 12 km/sec beyond Low Earth Orbit with
no propellants from Earth!
8Costs and Schedule8-year build program, fly in
year 5
- RDTE 15.5B
- Systems Acquisition 12.5B
- Aquila Launch Costs 44 FLTS 15.1B
- System Integration Oversight 38.2B
(people)
- Establishment of L1 GP LRB 81.2B
- Over an interval of 8 years
10B/year
- Continue at about that same rate for L1 GP LRB
operations, including support of an array of
other exploration missions, departing from L-1
using lunar-produced propellants. - Builds, over ten years of operation, to a LRB of
320 tons with a staff of 66 persons rotated
semi-annually
9Benefitsboth immediate far term
- Gain us our beach head on the real estate of the
Moon for future benefits to our nation and to the
free world - a national security imperative.
- Open all of space to future exploration by the
United States and others at an affordable cost
due to the use of lunar-produced propellants and
easier departures from L-1. - Provide large-scale commercial opportunities to
build, grow and operate these facilities
- Inspire our young people to gain a good education
in the most productive fields for our future
economy and provide the United States with up to
100,000 new jobs.
10Conclusions
- This scenario is not optimized, but is a
viable option
- The schedule and costs are greatly reduced by the
use of present equipment
- Estimated cost of 10B/year (20 of Highway Bill
now pending in Congress) may be difficult but is
not impossible - international cooperation and
commercial opportunities can help to make it
happen - Refinement is needed to improve the scenario, but
the elements are here.