Title: Update on the Regional Modeling System Cliff Mass, David Ovens, Richard Steed, Mark Albright, Phil Regulski, Jeff Baars, David Carey
1Update on the Regional Modeling SystemCliff
Mass, David Ovens, Richard Steed, Mark Albright,
Phil Regulski, Jeff Baars, David Carey
Northwest Weather Workshop March 3, 2007
2Supported by the Northwest Modeling
Consortiumthe regional modeling effort centered
at the UW is
- Running the MM5 at 36, 12, and 4 km resolution
- Running the new WRF model at 36, 12 km resolution
- Running TWO high resolution regional ensemble
systems to provide probabilistic forecasts and
data assimilation - Gathering all local weather observations from
dozens of networks. Plus quality control. - Running a wide range of weather applications
dealing with air quality, hydrology,
transportation weather and fire weather.
3(No Transcript)
436 km
512 km
64 km
7A Few of the Major Efforts and Improvements this
Year
8Evaluation of WRF
- WRF the Weather Research and Forecasting Model,
is the replacement for the MM5 and should be the
national mesoscale model used by both the
operational and research community. - On paper a far better modelbut it will take time
for all the bugs to removed and to regain all of
the same capabilities. - We are now running it at 36 and 12 km grid
spacing, and will be replacing the current test
version with the newest version with major
physics improvements and nudging on the outer
domain.
9Evaluation
- We will evaluate the new real-time WRF this
spring and for major historical cases. - If equal or superior, the modeling consortium
will probably ok the shift from MM5 to WRF. - Evaluations of old version show differences but
not superiority.
10Example of MM5 vs WRF Verifications
11March 1 Convergence Zone Event
12The Model Suggested Lowland Snow
13(No Transcript)
14The UW Quality Control System
- A major task continues to be the gathering of all
real-time observations of the region into one
place - Right now we acquire over 60 networks in real
time for displaying on our web site,
verification, and many other uses - But how does one remove bad data in the massive
amount of information we gather?
15The Answer The UW Quality Control and Warning
System
- We have developed an advanced QC system suitable
for an area of complex terrain (Jeff Baars) - We have developed an automated QC display system
that one can check on the web and which can
automatically tell the manager of a network when
their data is suspect (David Carey)
16Direction QC
17(No Transcript)
18(No Transcript)
19(No Transcript)
20Map Selection Interface
- We have a new map interface for getting
soundings, time height cross sections and
meteograms at ANY location. - Done by Phil Regulski
21(No Transcript)
22(No Transcript)
23Local Data Assimilation
- A major new effort has begun to assimilate all
local observations to create a physically
consistent three dimensional picture of the
regional atmosphere. - Needed for many reasonsincluding better
short-term forecasts and air quality studies. - The approach makes use of a 90-member ensemble
system--Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF)--probably
the best approach possible for using the forecast
model to use local observations
24Local Data Assimilation
- It will actually produce 90 different analyses
that be combined to produce the best guess at
what is there and tell us the uncertainty in the
analyses. - These analyses can be integrated forward in time
to give us probabilistic predictions of the
future - We now have it running at 36 and 12 km
resolutionmore this year!
25(No Transcript)
26(No Transcript)
27(No Transcript)
28Weather Radar on the Washington Coast Our Time
May Have Come!
29Now
With Two New Radars
30The Year
- More interest among WA Congressmen and Senators
- More power in NW delegation due to changes in
Congress - Local communities along the coast are interested
and lobbying - Local meteorologists should write and email and
use their influence.
31(No Transcript)
32(No Transcript)
33The END