Land Surface Temperature derived from the advanced IR sounders on METOP and NPOESS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 39
About This Presentation
Title:

Land Surface Temperature derived from the advanced IR sounders on METOP and NPOESS

Description:

Aerial Photograph Source: USGS Terraserver. AIRS 15-km. sub-pixel ... Aerial Photograph Source: USGS Terraserver. Field of View Scale: 1 km to 50 m. ARM. SGP ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:99
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: geoO
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Land Surface Temperature derived from the advanced IR sounders on METOP and NPOESS


1
Land Surface Temperature derived from the
advanced IR sounders on METOP and NPOESS
  • Robert Knuteson,
  • Henry E. Revercomb, David C. Tobin
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • Space Science and Engineering Center

ITWG 1st Land Surface Workshop, Paris, 21 June
2006
2
Topics Advanced IR Sounder
  • Temperature and IR Emissivity Separation -
    Example from Sahara
  • Temperature IR Emissivity Validation-
    Continental U.S. ARM site (Oklahoma)
  • Suggestion for NWP. (follow the approach outlined
    in Pequignot, LMD talk)

3
Surface Temperature Emissivity
Brightness Temperature (K)
4
(No Transcript)
5
Infrared Radiative Transfer Equation (lambertian
surface)
SurfaceEmission
Surface Reflection
Skin Temperature Surface Emissivity
6
Approximate Solutions
(spectral relative)
(atmospheric corrected spectral relative)
(formal solution - known atmosphere -
unknown skin temperature)
7
IR Land Surface Signatures QUARTZ Mineral
JPL Spectral Library Laboratory Measurements
1.0
1-R
12 ?m
Alluvial Sand Sandy Loam Soil
9 ?m
4 ?m
0.5
8
AIRS Observation 16 Nov 2002 11 UTC Red Sea
B.T.(K)
B.T.(K)
  • Microwindows are used to look between
    absorption lines.

9
NIGHT -- 9 ?m relative to 12 ?m
1.0
Thessaly Plain, Greece
Relative Emissivity
Libyan Desert Satellite Validation Target
Site (27.12N,26.10E)
0.7
16 November 2002 0000-0006 UTC (15-km FOV)
10
NIGHT -- 4 ?m relative to 12 ?m
1.0
Thessaly Plain, Greece
Relative Emissivity
Libyan Desert Satellite Validation Target
Site (27.12N,26.10E)
0.7
16 November 2002 0000-0006 UTC (15-km FOV)
11
DAY -- 9 ?m relative to 12 ?m
1.0
Relative Emissivity
Red Sea, Ocean
Libyan Desert Satellite Validation Target
Site (27.12N,26.10E)
0.7
16 November 2002 1100-1106 UTC (15-km FOV)
12
AIRS Spectral Relative Emissivity Egypt One
16 November 2002 1103 UTC
Egypt One
OBS. B.T. (K)
B-1(Robs)
Red Sea
Robs B(T12?m)
Raw Relative Emissivity
9 ?m
  • Relative emissivity is derived only from AIRS
    radiances.

13
AIRS Spectral Relative Emissivity Egypt One
Need Ozone Fit
Raw Relative Emissivity
9 ?m
  • Quartz reflectivity features are apparent in the
    desert case.

14
AIRS Relative Emissivity and Temperaturewith
Atmospheric Correction
  • 16 November 2002
  • Focus Day

15
ECMWF Analysis 16 Nov. 2002 12 UTC
  • Square symbol marks Egypt One site in Libyan
    Desert

16
ECMWF Analysis 16 Nov. 2002 12 UTC
Temperature
Water Vapor
  • ECMWF profile over Egypt One site in Libyan
    Desert

17
LBL Calculation Using ECMWF Model Profile
Up Down Radiance
Total Trans- mission
  • LBLRTM calculations reduced to AIRS spectral
    resolution.

18
AIRS Atmosphere Corrected Relative Emissivity
Need Ozone Fit
Atmos. Corrected Relative Emissivity
9 ?m
  • Atmospheric Correction uses ECMWF model T WV
    profiles.

19
AIRS Absolute EmissivityandSurface
Temperature(including Surface Reflection)
  • 16 November 2002
  • Focus Day

Technique follows that described in Knuteson, et
al., Adv. Space Res., 33 (2004) 1114-1119.
20
IASI Simulated IR Reflected Radiance
Contribution to TOA Radiance. (Note
Reflection is independent of Ts!)
Reflected contribution can be large !
Radiance (mW/(m2 sr cm-1))
Bare Soil
60 Veg.
Vegetation
21
Constraint Emissivity solution should be
smoothly varying across atmospheric absorption
lines!
E?
Std. Dev. E(Ts)
Minimum
  • Minimum Std. Deviation is at the true skin
    temperature !!

22
AIRS Absolute Emissivity
Preliminary!
Need Ozone Fit
AIRS Observ. JPL Spectral Library Alluvial Sand
UW Online- Offline Technique
9 ?m
  • Reflection calculation uses ECMWF model T WV
    profiles.

23
Spatial Scales
Land Surface Temperature Remote Sensing Issues
Bare Soil
  • Example from the U.S. Wheat Belt
  • ARM Southern Great Plains Site

Winter Wheat
Pasture (Grassland)
24
Field of View Scale 15 km to 1 km
AIRS 15-km sub-pixel
SHIS (2 km)
MODIS IR (1 km)
Approximate Location
Aerial Photograph Source USGS Terraserver
25
Field of View Scale 1 km to 50 m
MODIS IR (1 km)
MODIS vis (250 m)
ARM SGP CF
MAS (50 m)
100 yd by 100 yd
Aerial Photograph Source USGS Terraserver
26
U.S. Southern Great Plains (DOE ARM site)
1.00
Vegetation
Emissivity
Bare Soil
12 ?m
8.5 ?m
0.80
850
1250
Wavenumber
  • MODIS Airborne Simulator (MAS) Spectral Bands
    compared to measured Bare Soil Green Vegetation

27
1.5 km x 1.5 km
MAS 50 meter data
12 ?m
8.5 ?m
8.5 ?m minus 12 ?m
Rel. Emiss.
  • Scales comparable to MODIS and VIIRS are highly
    variable.

28
10 km x 7.5 km
MAS 50 meter data
12 ?m
8.5 ?m
8.5 ?m minus 12 ?m
Rel. Emiss.
  • Scales of AIRS, IASI, and CrIS provide inherent
    averaging.

29
UW-Derived IR Emissivity from NASA AIRS
  • AIRS emissivity a linear combination of pure
    scene types.

LSE from AIRS Radiance Using UW Research Algorith
m
1.00
UW Research Product
0.85
750
1250
Wavenumber (cm-1)
Wavenumber (cm-1)
30
Ts (Absolute) from AIRS Vs. Truth (Downlooking
IRT)
Point Validation
outlier
  • Surface Variability is Large.

31
Ts (Absolute) from AIRS Vs. Ts (12 ?m) from AIRS
Point Validation
  • 12 ?m estimate as good as Absolute!

32
Surface temperature and Vegetation Fraction
Distributions Sept. 2002 March 2005 (Clear
only)
Ts Day
Ts Night
Note similarDay NightVegetationFraction
fromvery differentTs distributions
Veg. Frac. Night
Veg. Frac. Day
33
Surface Emissivity and Land Use as Observed by
EOS AIRS
Emissivity (9 ?m)
Nov. 2003
Nov. 2004
Nov. 2002
Emissivity (4 ?m)
Vegetated
Exposed Soil !
  • AIRS measures the infrared emissivity change due
    to land use (agricultural cycle of wheat
    farming planting and harvesting)

34
Recommendation for NWP
  • Suggestion for IASI (AIRS, or CrIS) is to
    estimate the skin Temperature from narrow
    micro-window at 12 microns (about 832 cm-1),
    using a guess for the surface emissivity. (See E.
    Pequignot-LMD talk).
  • With this Ts, the emissivity can be retrieved at
    all surface sensitive channels after atmospheric
    correction.
  • Use of the spectral variance constraint can
    further improve the results if RTE errors are
    small enough.
  • However, fits to laboratory data (see E. Borbas
    UW talk) will still be needed to provide
    emissivity spectra that cover all the sounding
    channels.

35
Backup Slides
36
AIRS Temperature Validation MODIS Comparison
Comments Day/Night algorithm 5 km spatial
resolution MOD11C product
320
300
270
JULY 2003 MODIS (MOD11C) DAY-TIME
37
AIRS Temperature Validation MODIS Comparison
Comments MODIS Good Data Flag Used. Reduced from
0.05 degree to 1 degree resolution Within Std
Dev. lt 1 K
320
300
270
JULY 2003 MODIS Averaged to 1 degree Grid
38
AIRS Temperature Validation MODIS Comparison
MODIS (v. 4)
AIRS (v. 4)
Comments AIRS minus MODIS Mean 1.4 K Std
Dev 2.1 K
July 2003
AIRS - MODIS
-5 0 5
-6 0 6
39
AIRS Temperature Validation MODIS Comparison
320
Comments North AmericanDay-TimeMean
TsurfaceBias within ?1 K except during Winter
K
250
AIRS minus MODIS
2
-2
1
12
MONTH of 2003
40
Acknowledgements
  • NASA EOS Validation Support
  • AIRS Team (JPL team leader, M. Chahine)
  • NPOESS program (S. Mango, IPO)
  • CNES and EUMETSAT
  • ECMWF and the UK Met Office
  • U.S. Department of Energy ARM program
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com